eejay the dj 31,964 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 7 hours ago, Bears r us said: I never knew that Farrier was such a republican, horrible people that get elected in our wee country now. Sadly been happening for decades mate .It’s like a cartel of corruption The question would be .Who runs this City/Country .Officially and the underground world .I think that shower control both . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
6superbarry6 14,159 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 10 hours ago, eejay the dj said: He hasn’t been getting any big games I find that strange His cheating is too blatant, they need a more subtle cheat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 792 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 whyte and lennon job swap on the cards? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1963 900 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 19 hours ago, semaj said: i heard its Micheal Stewart To be fair to him he was ahead of the times regarding the field of biomechanics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 They're talking about not replacing her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersInCanada 7,775 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 The cynic in me suspects that she may not have been compliant enough for liewell so she had to go. The pragmatic side of me asks why a lawyer is regarded to be the best choice for someone whose role is to apply footballing rules. A radical thought for the authorities but why not advertise the post as a part time (can work from home role) and then select the candidate with the most footballing knowledge. Goes without saying that approach would not sit well with liewell but he is the problem and not the solution. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 46 minutes ago, Rfc52 said: They're talking about not replacing her. Maxwell said they're looking for a replacement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Maxwell said they're looking for a replacement. Today theyre discussing not replacing her or now I've just read hiring a law firm (coincidence would see that be harper mcloed id imagine) rather than a direct replacement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, GersInCanada said: The cynic in me suspects that she may not have been compliant enough for liewell so she had to go. The pragmatic side of me asks why a lawyer is regarded to be the best choice for someone whose role is to apply footballing rules. A radical thought for the authorities but why not advertise the post as a part time (can work from home role) and then select the candidate with the most footballing knowledge. Goes without saying that approach would not sit well with liewell but he is the problem and not the solution. The role includes making decisions which may be subject to legal challenge, so I actually get why a legal background is important. Unfortunately much of our legal profession come from a cult background, hence the chance of one of them always being in the role. That and the fact the scum control the narrative of the game up here and wouldn't allow anyone not that way inclined into a position of such authority. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Just now, Rfc52 said: Today theyre discussing not replacing her or now I've just read hiring a law firm (coincidence would see that be harper mcloed id imagine) rather than a direct replacement Is that not a suggestion from someone with no influence in the decision making? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS4_wul 4,110 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 14 hours ago, magic8ball said: Can anybody really explain the offside law these days 😂😂. Not since Stephen Hawking died. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Traive 22,741 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 41 minutes ago, Rfc52 said: Today theyre discussing not replacing her or now I've just read hiring a law firm (coincidence would see that be harper mcloed id imagine) rather than a direct replacement How many bears read “possibly using a law firm instead” and automatically assumed Harper MacLeod? Corrupt as fuck Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,282 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 27 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: How many bears read “possibly using a law firm instead” and automatically assumed Harper MacLeod? Corrupt as fuck Liberally the first thing I thought. They did such a great job on the so called investigation 🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersInCanada 7,775 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The role includes making decisions which may be subject to legal challenge, so I actually get why a legal background is important. Unfortunately much of our legal profession come from a cult background, hence the chance of one of them always being in the role. That and the fact the scum control the narrative of the game up here and wouldn't allow anyone not that way inclined into a position of such authority. You make valid points but they employ that very fat guy as a lawyer. I don't see why such a small organisation requires 2. The role needs to be reappraised. Someone who knows football and can decide based on experience that yes that was a red card or no it was not with the authority to make recommendations regarding the demotion of officials. Of course it won't happen but in my opinion that's what needs to be done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 20,591 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 16 hours ago, tannerall said: Can you explain the offside law. ? (100% confident you can, by the way, just jesting) An attacking player is deened to be offside if any part of their body apart from the hands and arms are closer to the opponent's goal line than the ball and the second last opponent. It only becomes an issue if the offside player is in that position when the ball is played by a team mate and they become involved in play, interfere with an opponent or gain an advantage by being in that position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: An attacking player is deened to be offside if any part of their body apart from the hands and arms are closer to the opponent's goal line than the ball and the second last opponent. It only becomes an issue if the offside player is in that position when the ball is played by a team mate and they become involved in play, interfere with an opponent or gain an advantage by being in that position. That deserves post of the day .Most of us understand the rule ,But could explain it verbally nevermind write it . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin 13,613 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 11 hours ago, AlbertzLoyalRSC said: You might be in for a shout for the job then... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Just to set your minds at rest, the bhoys have the job in hand.👍🏻 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 10 hours ago, eejay the dj said: Sadly been happening for decades mate .It’s like a cartel of corruption The question would be .Who runs this City/Country .Officially and the underground world .I think that shower control both . Been a little busy today mate and never seen your reply until now. I have no idea what is happening in our wee country to be honest, but it is a clusterfuck with SNP/Republications wanting to take us out of the UK. I sometimes have to take a break from it all at times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 8 hours ago, GersInCanada said: The cynic in me suspects that she may not have been compliant enough for liewell so she had to go. The pragmatic side of me asks why a lawyer is regarded to be the best choice for someone whose role is to apply footballing rules. A radical thought for the authorities but why not advertise the post as a part time (can work from home role) and then select the candidate with the most footballing knowledge. Goes without saying that approach would not sit well with liewell but he is the problem and not the solution. Come of to fuck mate, don't be coming on here with your common sense approach. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueshoff 11,799 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 8 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The role includes making decisions which may be subject to legal challenge, so I actually get why a legal background is important. Unfortunately much of our legal profession come from a cult background, hence the chance of one of them always being in the role. That and the fact the scum control the narrative of the game up here and wouldn't allow anyone not that way inclined into a position of such authority. Hmmm. But if you hired someone more competent and likely to get decisions correct a legal background wouldn't be crucial. Unless you knew some of the decisions would be a bit iffy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueshoff 11,799 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 6 hours ago, magic8ball said: That deserves post of the day .Most of us understand the rule ,But could explain it verbally nevermind write it . But @Blue Nosed Babe can Google and cut and paste too! 😊 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 20,591 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 27 minutes ago, Blueshoff said: But @Blue Nosed Babe can Google and cut and paste too! 😊 Fuck you. I watch a lot of the analysis stuff with the lines etc to work it out. I also research cquse that is what lawyers do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Nosed Babe 20,591 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 32 minutes ago, Blueshoff said: Hmmm. But if you hired someone more competent and likely to get decisions correct a legal background wouldn't be crucial. Unless you knew some of the decisions would be a bit iffy. If it is interpretation of rules or game laws and preparing charges and cases then you really need a legal background. I know an ex ref who is a lawyer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueshoff 11,799 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Fuck you. I watch a lot of the analysis stuff with the lines etc to work it out. I also research cquse that is what lawyers do. 🎣😂😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.