eejay the dj 30,286 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 7 hours ago, Bears r us said: I never knew that Farrier was such a republican, horrible people that get elected in our wee country now. Sadly been happening for decades mate .It’s like a cartel of corruption The question would be .Who runs this City/Country .Officially and the underground world .I think that shower control both . Helicopter Sundae, Bears r us and SeparateEntityMyArse like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
6superbarry6 8,373 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 10 hours ago, eejay the dj said: He hasn’t been getting any big games I find that strange His cheating is too blatant, they need a more subtle cheat. Bears r us and eejay the dj like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bears 686 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 whyte and lennon job swap on the cards? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post mark1963 144 Posted November 17, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted November 17, 2020 19 hours ago, semaj said: i heard its Micheal Stewart To be fair to him he was ahead of the times regarding the field of biomechanics. magic8ball, Bears r us, Dickie1963 and 3 others like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RfcSevco 72,234 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 They're talking about not replacing her. Howsitgoing likes this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GersInCanada 4,657 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 The cynic in me suspects that she may not have been compliant enough for liewell so she had to go. The pragmatic side of me asks why a lawyer is regarded to be the best choice for someone whose role is to apply footballing rules. A radical thought for the authorities but why not advertise the post as a part time (can work from home role) and then select the candidate with the most footballing knowledge. Goes without saying that approach would not sit well with liewell but he is the problem and not the solution. SteveEarle, One Jock Wallace and Bears r us like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SeparateEntityMyArse 44,819 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 46 minutes ago, Rfc52 said: They're talking about not replacing her. Maxwell said they're looking for a replacement. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RfcSevco 72,234 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Maxwell said they're looking for a replacement. Today theyre discussing not replacing her or now I've just read hiring a law firm (coincidence would see that be harper mcloed id imagine) rather than a direct replacement Bears r us and the sliver fox like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SeparateEntityMyArse 44,819 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, GersInCanada said: The cynic in me suspects that she may not have been compliant enough for liewell so she had to go. The pragmatic side of me asks why a lawyer is regarded to be the best choice for someone whose role is to apply footballing rules. A radical thought for the authorities but why not advertise the post as a part time (can work from home role) and then select the candidate with the most footballing knowledge. Goes without saying that approach would not sit well with liewell but he is the problem and not the solution. The role includes making decisions which may be subject to legal challenge, so I actually get why a legal background is important. Unfortunately much of our legal profession come from a cult background, hence the chance of one of them always being in the role. That and the fact the scum control the narrative of the game up here and wouldn't allow anyone not that way inclined into a position of such authority. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SeparateEntityMyArse 44,819 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Just now, Rfc52 said: Today theyre discussing not replacing her or now I've just read hiring a law firm (coincidence would see that be harper mcloed id imagine) rather than a direct replacement Is that not a suggestion from someone with no influence in the decision making? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RS4_wul 2,047 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 14 hours ago, magic8ball said: Can anybody really explain the offside law these days 😂😂. Not since Stephen Hawking died. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Colin Traive 10,027 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 41 minutes ago, Rfc52 said: Today theyre discussing not replacing her or now I've just read hiring a law firm (coincidence would see that be harper mcloed id imagine) rather than a direct replacement How many bears read “possibly using a law firm instead” and automatically assumed Harper MacLeod? Corrupt as fuck Bears r us, Dickie1963 and RfcSevco like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BlueKnight87 9,312 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 27 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: How many bears read “possibly using a law firm instead” and automatically assumed Harper MacLeod? Corrupt as fuck Liberally the first thing I thought. They did such a great job on the so called investigation 🤣 Bears r us likes this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
GersInCanada 4,657 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The role includes making decisions which may be subject to legal challenge, so I actually get why a legal background is important. Unfortunately much of our legal profession come from a cult background, hence the chance of one of them always being in the role. That and the fact the scum control the narrative of the game up here and wouldn't allow anyone not that way inclined into a position of such authority. You make valid points but they employ that very fat guy as a lawyer. I don't see why such a small organisation requires 2. The role needs to be reappraised. Someone who knows football and can decide based on experience that yes that was a red card or no it was not with the authority to make recommendations regarding the demotion of officials. Of course it won't happen but in my opinion that's what needs to be done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Nosed Babe 12,046 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 16 hours ago, tannerall said: Can you explain the offside law. ? (100% confident you can, by the way, just jesting) An attacking player is deened to be offside if any part of their body apart from the hands and arms are closer to the opponent's goal line than the ball and the second last opponent. It only becomes an issue if the offside player is in that position when the ball is played by a team mate and they become involved in play, interfere with an opponent or gain an advantage by being in that position. Land Rover and magic8ball like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
magic8ball 17,267 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: An attacking player is deened to be offside if any part of their body apart from the hands and arms are closer to the opponent's goal line than the ball and the second last opponent. It only becomes an issue if the offside player is in that position when the ball is played by a team mate and they become involved in play, interfere with an opponent or gain an advantage by being in that position. That deserves post of the day .Most of us understand the rule ,But could explain it verbally nevermind write it . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mrmojorisin 8,563 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 11 hours ago, AlbertzLoyalRSC said: You might be in for a shout for the job then... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BLUEDIGNITY 18,392 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Just to set your minds at rest, the bhoys have the job in hand.👍🏻 Bears r us likes this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bears r us 21,898 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 10 hours ago, eejay the dj said: Sadly been happening for decades mate .It’s like a cartel of corruption The question would be .Who runs this City/Country .Officially and the underground world .I think that shower control both . Been a little busy today mate and never seen your reply until now. I have no idea what is happening in our wee country to be honest, but it is a clusterfuck with SNP/Republications wanting to take us out of the UK. I sometimes have to take a break from it all at times. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bears r us 21,898 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 8 hours ago, GersInCanada said: The cynic in me suspects that she may not have been compliant enough for liewell so she had to go. The pragmatic side of me asks why a lawyer is regarded to be the best choice for someone whose role is to apply footballing rules. A radical thought for the authorities but why not advertise the post as a part time (can work from home role) and then select the candidate with the most footballing knowledge. Goes without saying that approach would not sit well with liewell but he is the problem and not the solution. Come of to fuck mate, don't be coming on here with your common sense approach. They Gnu likes this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blueshoff 4,808 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 8 hours ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: The role includes making decisions which may be subject to legal challenge, so I actually get why a legal background is important. Unfortunately much of our legal profession come from a cult background, hence the chance of one of them always being in the role. That and the fact the scum control the narrative of the game up here and wouldn't allow anyone not that way inclined into a position of such authority. Hmmm. But if you hired someone more competent and likely to get decisions correct a legal background wouldn't be crucial. Unless you knew some of the decisions would be a bit iffy. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blueshoff 4,808 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 6 hours ago, magic8ball said: That deserves post of the day .Most of us understand the rule ,But could explain it verbally nevermind write it . But @Blue Nosed Babe can Google and cut and paste too! 😊 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Nosed Babe 12,046 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 27 minutes ago, Blueshoff said: But @Blue Nosed Babe can Google and cut and paste too! 😊 Fuck you. I watch a lot of the analysis stuff with the lines etc to work it out. I also research cquse that is what lawyers do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Nosed Babe 12,046 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 32 minutes ago, Blueshoff said: Hmmm. But if you hired someone more competent and likely to get decisions correct a legal background wouldn't be crucial. Unless you knew some of the decisions would be a bit iffy. If it is interpretation of rules or game laws and preparing charges and cases then you really need a legal background. I know an ex ref who is a lawyer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blueshoff 4,808 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Blue Nosed Babe said: Fuck you. I watch a lot of the analysis stuff with the lines etc to work it out. I also research cquse that is what lawyers do. 🎣😂😂 eejay the dj and MisterC like this Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.