The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 12 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: I don't know if most fans are. Point is Morelos was guilty of an infringement the ref saw it and gave him a yellow. Teams that have done the same infringement this season at most got a yellow so why should the ref have given him more? The CO's office need to explain why they undermined the ref's decision The CO felt the official missed an instance of violent conduct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgow argyle 1,093 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 24 minutes ago, Heshootshescores said: Nah, I've had enough mate. We win on 2nd Jan and 55 is in the bag, and we can't trust this guy to stay on the park. I've been as guilty as any of making excuses for him in the past, but the stakes are too high now. If we don't drop points before and beat septic on 2nd January we will be in a very strong position but I will wait to see what sort of lead we have at the end of January before saying it's in the bag.. tricky fixtures after septic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 Separate charge? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: The CO felt the official missed an instance of violent conduct. They should be made to explain the decision as it's unclear why he was given a yellow then got a ban Do you have connections to get to the bottom of this story? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 Just now, Sweetheart said: They should be made to explain the decision as it's unclear why he was given a yellow then got a ban He got the ban because the club accepted he'd committed violent conduct which had been missed be the referee and accepted a two match ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Separate charge? Ramans got that one wrong. Not a separate charge. It's the flick of the arm at the end of it. Referee never seen it, booked him for the challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: He got the ban because the club accepted he'd committed violent conduct which had been missed be the referee and accepted a two match ban. A separate infringement or a second punishment for the infringement in question? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 6 minutes ago, The Dude said: Ramans got that one wrong. Not a separate charge. It's the flick of the arm at the end of it. Referee never seen it, booked him for the challenge. Booked him for jumping? The only contact he made was with his arm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFCRobertson 11,778 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 Morelos getting the ban doesn't bother me, he was lucky to be on the pitch but the thing that does bother me is how blatent the scottish FA is with what cases is picks up for action. There's so many other high profile injuries that's happend that has gone unpunished. The challenge on connoly being a yellow stinks of making up an excuse to get him banned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 12 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: A separate infringement or a second punishment for the infringement in question? An increased punishment not a second one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 10 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Booked him for jumping? The only contact he made was with his arm Leading with his arm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: Leading with his arm. So why did the ref book him in the first place if the CO is saying the ref didn't see him leading with is arm? It's very unclear dude Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: So why did the ref book him in the first place if the CO is saying the ref didn't see him leading with is arm? It's very unclear dude Thats literally the opposite of what I've said. He was booked for leading with his arm in the challenge. Ref missed the wee flick at the end that most seem to agree merited a red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Traive 22,748 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 19 minutes ago, The Dude said: He got the ban because the club accepted he'd committed violent conduct which had been missed be the referee and accepted a two match ban. So what DID the referee see to merit a yellow card? Seems like his version is flip-flopping all over the place to suit the default anti-Rangers stance. Did the referee see what Morelos actually did or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Thats literally the opposite of what I've said. He was booked for leading with his arm in the challenge. Ref missed the wee flick at the end that most seem to agree merited a red. It's still not clear on why the ref booked him and the need for CO intervention. The only contact made was with his arm. so what did the ref see to warrant the yellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkytfp1 18,594 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 3 hours ago, ScottBF2 said: Was it Edwards on Morelos? The one he studs Morelos in the knee. Actual damage done to a player which thankfully wasn’t as serious as it first looked but which resulted in the player having to be taken off. Morelos deserved a red, aye, but if a panel of ex referees look at those two incidents and decide the one involving Morelos where no contact was made was the worse of the two then the games fucked. I'm no just playing devils advocate here, but the Dundee utd boys tackle was not meant at all imo. I can see the argument that it's endangering an opponent however and excessive force. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
doc holliday 1,653 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 For the 'forearm smash' ( mhank Caldwell) that never happened. But it is Alfie/Rangers and you know knew he would be screwed. I watched the physical stuff he was getting from Connolly off the ball and could sense his frustration.The fly low profile hammer throwers get away with it. Morelos needs to wise up...but how long have we been repeating that mantra. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 9 minutes ago, Colin Traive said: So what DID the referee see to merit a yellow card? Seems like his version is flip-flopping all over the place to suit the default anti-Rangers stance. Did the referee see what Morelos actually did or not? He saw him jump into Connolly leading with his arm, he never saw the wee bit at the end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamMunny 3,234 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 5 minutes ago, The Dude said: He saw him jump into Connolly leading with his arm, he never saw the wee bit at the end. Ref must have looked away at the last second which I don't believe Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 Just now, Rangers_no1 said: Fuck knows how, he was looking straight at it. Nothing surprises me with how shite refs are in this country. Not seen any more than a acouple of games this season where refs haven't made at least two or three massive mistakes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number5 2,121 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 He got away with one that had it been spotted could have had a massive effect on the result. Totally stupidity on his part. They've looked at it again and suspended him. Fait enough. It actually suits us, misses 2 games which I would have dropped him for anyway. Give him a chance to reflect and push on and try and earn his place back if Roofe or especially Itten take their chance. It's a negative story we don't need to worry about. Hopefully the wee spends the next couple of weeks working on getting back to his best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 11 minutes ago, The Dude said: He saw him jump into Connolly leading with his arm, he never saw the wee bit at the end. Morelos jumps, starts to turn, then and only then is contact made with his arm. There's something not adding up here and it stinks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,149 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 We can all complain on here until the subject of parity is done to death but unless the club speak out then the authorities will continue to walk all over us and all to the benefit of the beasts in the east end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billscott 2,463 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 53 minutes ago, The Dude said: He got the ban because the club accepted he'd committed violent conduct which had been missed be the referee and accepted a two match ban. thats 100% right it suits us anyway as if we appealed and lost he would get a 3 match ban i am sure he would not have started tonight and sat at home to motherwell is another good game for him to miss Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billscott 2,463 Posted December 16, 2020 Share Posted December 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bad Robot said: We can all complain on here until the subject of parity is done to death but unless the club speak out then the authorities will continue to walk all over us and all to the benefit of the beasts in the east end. why does the club need to speak every sane and honest would admit it was a red card all day long we would have been screaming on here if it happened in reverse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.