magic8ball 27,904 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 21 minutes ago, Gandalf the Blue said: If the thumb was booked for his wee shoving match, then he can be retrospectively banned for the stamp cant he? Not that im holding my breath. Even for a yellow for the stamp ,he can still get citied If the ref sees something after yh game that he didn’t see during the game that would otherwise have merited a red card such as violent conduct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Robmc1 said: This basically highlights the CO fiasco, inadequacy and lack of transparency. Here we have an SPFL manager highlighting an incident Stevie Wonder could have observed as a red card yet it’s a mystery if it will be on her desk or even the process for having it reviewed. I still find it hard to comprehend, understand and basically believe that in this day and age with the finance and profile involved in the game that this whole process appears to be masked in smoke and mirrors. You can bet though if it was Morelos I have no doubt he’d be cited for the same incident this season... The papes had the CO appointed to their benefit from the start. It is about as unbiased as the Nazi party with the Union. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HG5 12,259 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 31 minutes ago, Blumhoilann said: But wasn't he booked for the push as Gogic was,if so the stamp went unpunished ;-( Good point, mate! I only saw the stamp bit in isolation, so hadn’t joined the dots up on that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blumhoilann 6,715 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 I'm hoping Brian Rice takes this up wi the CO 😉 No doubt they'll find a rule that bans him from reporting because he was in the stand 😞 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,349 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Robmc1 said: This basically highlights the CO fiasco, inadequacy and lack of transparency. Here we have an SPFL manager highlighting an incident Stevie Wonder could have observed as a red card yet it’s a mystery if it will be on her desk or even the process for having it reviewed. I still find it hard to comprehend, understand and basically believe that in this day and age with the finance and profile involved in the game that this whole process appears to be masked in smoke and mirrors. You can bet though if it was Morelos I have no doubt he’d be cited for the same incident this season... If the CO does not do him for this then I have no idea what would get one of their players cited. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 4 minutes ago, Bears r us said: If the CO does not do him for this then I have no idea what would get one of their players cited. Saying they are not a pape would probably do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 5 minutes ago, Malvern said: The papes had the CO appointed to their benefit from the start. It is about as unbiased as the Nazi party with the Union. The whole system is in their favour ,It’s even widely known that they employ a PR firm to not only cover up negative stories ,not just the child abuse shit ,the PR company also actively seeks negative stories about the rest of the clubs , Now if that’s not a case for bringing the game into disrepute and a potential maximum penalty of expulsion from the league then nothing is ,Will never happen because they have control over the rule makers and committees Even when the new vice precedent was brought in ,Mulraney the Alloa owner it was seen as letting the small clubs have a say ,I used to live in Alloa and Mulraney is well known a a taig fan and an extremely bitter one at that ,who’s he there to help ,it’s not Alloa or the wee clubs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,349 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Just now, Malvern said: Saying they are not a pape would probably do it. Probably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robmc1 4,741 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 38 minutes ago, Bears r us said: If the CO does not do him for this then I have no idea what would get one of their players cited. Being out with long term injury seems to qualify them for citation... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottyscott1963 19,145 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 44 minutes ago, Malvern said: The papes had the CO appointed to their benefit from the start. It is about as unbiased as the Nazi party with the Union. 3 out of 3 CO's have been self confessed fenian ST holders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Just now, scottyscott1963 said: 3 out of 3 CO's have been self confessed fenian ST holders. Gifted season tickets by Peter himself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclovin9091 1,408 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 4 hours ago, magic8ball said: This a perfect case for the compliance officer to step in ,even though a yellow has been issued the referee can report that he never saw the full extent at the time for something a red card should have been issued for , Now it would need the referee to do it ,so I won’t hold my breath , Just another thing to add to the list of why this compliance system is not fit for purpose and open to corruption Compliance officer should get called for the push on the Hamilton player which the Hamilton player received a yellow for pushing thumb, but yet thumb did not get booked for the same offence. (Clear inconsistency) Compliance officer should get called in for the push of the referees hand, also a yellow. Therefore if the referee was consistent that would have been two yellows for thumb and a subsequent red card. Obviously the above is because the referee missed the stamp, which then, as it was missed could be brought in front of the Compliance officer and he can be rewarded with a red for that as well. All in all a lengthy ban for thumb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 15 minutes ago, mclovin9091 said: Compliance officer should get called for the push on the Hamilton player which the Hamilton player received a yellow for pushing thumb, but yet thumb did not get booked for the same offence. (Clear inconsistency) Compliance officer should get called in for the push of the referees hand, also a yellow. Therefore if the referee was consistent that would have been two yellows for thumb and a subsequent red card. Obviously the above is because the referee missed the stamp, which then, as it was missed could be brought in front of the Compliance officer and he can be rewarded with a red for that as well. All in all a lengthy ban for thumb. Compliance doesn’t step in for yellows though ,should be all over him for the stamp though ,that was probably the worst stamp in many years in Scotland ,maybe not full hard force ,but sheer intent , If he isn’t mentally fit to be playing he shouldn’t be playing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 31,349 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 47 minutes ago, Robmc1 said: Being out with long term injury seems to qualify them for citation... Yes I had forgot about that sham citing, if it was not so serious it would be hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,540 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 That's what we're up against in this country with these cunts having newspaper columns and punditry jobs. Previous tweet was praising their performance but as soon as he's asked about that he claims he's not seen it. Bitter fat fenian bastard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,403 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 5 hours ago, murzo said: 67E88F57-A3DE-4912-877C-634D358D930D.MOV 25.16 MB · 49 downloads How does a ref judge the amount of force, it doesn’t matter, the aggressive intent was there, just like his tape throwing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersMedia 35,962 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 2 minutes ago, ritchieshearercaldow said: How does a ref judge the amount of force, it doesn’t matter, the aggressive intent was there, just like his tape throwing The tape throwing was a bit meh. However that was a stamp and generally any sort of stamp gets a red card. Whilst he hasn't put full force into it, it is hardly a tickle either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadron Collider 32,404 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 37 minutes ago, ritchieshearercaldow said: How does a ref judge the amount of force, it doesn’t matter, the aggressive intent was there, just like his tape throwing He really is just a bitter bitter cunt! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenv 2,179 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Why would the amount of force matter? Is it OK for Alfie to headbutt a player if he doesn't put his full heart into it? (granted - bad example, as Alfie's probably unable to even take a dump without putting his full heart and soul into making it count). Re: the tape throwing, for me the complete let-off still sets the precident that it's apparently OK to throw something at / throwing something back at fans - that's apparently not provocation of fans, as our players seem to get accused of regardless. Candias blowing a kiss: provocation. Griffith's throwing something at a fan: not provocation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aird 3,950 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 1 hour ago, aird said: That's the longest clip iv seen of that, and that is completely indefensible, first clip I saw it could maybe be have been interpreted as a loss of balance, but shocked at that he deliberately went out his way to stamp on a guy lying on the ground The media dicks showing any kind of defence of that are nothing more than cunts suckling on the tarrier teat for cash Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 3 hours ago, scottyscott1963 said: 3 out of 3 CO's have been self confessed fenian ST holders. Whats the chances of that eh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperLeeMcCulloch 2,496 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Look's like there all have master's degree's in physics now, all taig comments on that Gab Marcotti tweet saying it you look closely you can see him shift his weight on to his left foot 😂😂 absolute maniacs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperPapac05 3,383 Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 5 hours ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: That's what we're up against in this country with these cunts having newspaper columns and punditry jobs. Previous tweet was praising their performance but as soon as he's asked about that he claims he's not seen it. Bitter fat fenian bastard. Of course he never, just like the rest of them he's only interested in seeing what Rangers get up to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,904 Posted February 4, 2020 Share Posted February 4, 2020 6 hours ago, SuperPapac05 said: Of course he never, just like the rest of them he's only interested in seeing what Rangers get up to. There’s no way the lying bastard never saw it even the cunts at BBC Scotland saw it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.