BallochBear 1,613 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 3 minutes ago, Malkster said: Free 10 in a row T-shirt withevery purchase Have they done a deal with Kevin? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluekev 43,645 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 7 hours ago, Ger_onimo said: Spend a 1/4 mil on a piss up in Dubai during a pandemic, then have the taxpayer pick up part of your wage bill. Another day, another PR disaster 😃 Nothing ever changes. Even after all this time they're still fucking their young uns. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkster 4,857 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 STOP PRESS.............new name in the hat for Sharkheid job... TERRY MUNRO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
They Gnu 11,553 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 20 minutes ago, Malkster said: STOP PRESS.............new name in the hat for Sharkheid job... TERRY MUNRO The Lisbon Lions won’t see it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,595 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 hour ago, The Dude said: He tested within the 168-window and wasn't under any requirement to isolate. Patterson was identified as a close contact of someone who tested positive and was required to isolate. Duffy was allowed to play based on a negative test Patterson wasn't allowed to play despite testing negative there is no difference Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 minute ago, KingKirk said: Duffy was allowed to play based on a negative test Patterson wasn't allowed to play despite testing negative there is no difference There is a difference. One was obliged under the law to self-isolate after being identified as a close-contact of someone who tested positive. A negative test doesn't supercede that. The other was under no requirement to self-isolate and only had to comply with the SFA/SPFL's testing protocols as a result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,595 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 minute ago, The Dude said: There is a difference. One was obliged under the law to self-isolate after being identified as a close-contact of someone who tested positive. A negative test doesn't supercede that. The other was under no requirement to self-isolate and only had to comply with the SFA/SPFL's testing protocols as a result. John Kennedy said different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,313 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Just now, The Dude said: There is a difference. One was obliged under the law to self-isolate after being identified as a close-contact of someone who tested positive. A negative test doesn't supercede that. The other was under no requirement to self-isolate and only had to comply with the SFA/SPFL's testing protocols as a result. What about the chances of Duffys name being conveniently not on the track and trace list provided by the tarriers? Don't understand how he can be pictured alongside all the players that have been named yet somehow avoided such himself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B1872 20,644 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 That Tweet from Spartak is class! EVERYONE is laughing at they tramps. 👍🏻 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,313 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Btw enjoying Durham on Talksport ripping the shit out of the tarriers. Says they should be demoted to League 2 for bringing the game to major disrepute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, KingKirk said: John Kennedy said different He got it wrong. Duffy doesn't have to self isolate after his return from Dubai. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, esquire8 said: What about the chances of Duffys name being conveniently not on the track and trace list provided by the tarriers? Don't understand how he can be pictured alongside all the players that have been named yet somehow avoided such himself. Zero chance. Track and trace only covers the 48 hours prior to testing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,646 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Btw, of course Killie & St Mirren win their appeals today. Their lawyers will pinpoint everything that happened in Dubai as a defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 13 minutes ago, The Dude said: There is a difference. One was obliged under the law to self-isolate after being identified as a close-contact of someone who tested positive. A negative test doesn't supercede that. The other was under no requirement to self-isolate and only had to comply with the SFA/SPFL's testing protocols as a result. Not under the law as such but the government has advised the public who travelled the same journey he done to self-isolate for 10 days. Why so little has been made of that tells its own story. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said: Not under the law as such but the government has advised the public who travelled the same journey he done to self-isolate for 10 days. Why so little has been made of that tells its own story. Because the elite sports exemption covers it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 😂😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Just now, The Dude said: Because the elite sports exemption covers it. It’s good they can opt in and out of it with so little consideration. If all it takes is two negatives then why are the others that are currently self-isolating not just opting out of the bubble then back in? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said: It’s good they can opt in and out of it with so little consideration. If all it takes is two negatives then why are the others that are currently self-isolating not just opting out of the bubble then back in? Because they are legally required to self isolate. At no point was Duffy legally required to isolate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Because they are legally required to self isolate. At no point was Duffy legally required to isolate. I can understand that but at the same time the public he travelled with whilst outwith the sporting bubble were advised by the Scottish government to self-isolate for 10 days. Not enforceable but still should result in some negative headlines, you would of thought. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,123 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Pity this wasn’t a Scottish journalist Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Just now, Howsitgoing said: I can understand that but at the same time the public he travelled with whilst outwith the sporting bubble were advised by the Scottish government to self-isolate for 10 days. Not enforceable but still should result in some negative headlines, you would of thought. Players travel outside the 'sporting bubble' regularly. When Barisic travels to join the Croatian squad, hes outside the bubble. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howsitgoing 4,281 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: Players travel outside the 'sporting bubble' regularly. When Barisic travels to join the Croatian squad, hes outside the bubble. If Barisic travelled back from a country who the Scottish government was advising that they self-isolate for 10 days do you think our club would ignore such advice and play him anyway? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,601 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 25 minutes ago, The Dude said: Zero chance. Track and trace only covers the 48 hours prior to testing. How often does testing happen, and what are the rules around when tests are needed? Didn't know it was contact within 48 hrs of testing 👍 And are there any specific protocols around elite athletes bubbles? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Just now, Howsitgoing said: If Barisic travelled back from a country who the Scottish government was advising that they self-isolate for 10 days do you think our club would ignore such advice and play him anyway? Yes. The advice to self-isolate, generally, wouldn't cover our players. Our players would comply with the guidelines for elite sports rather than the general public. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
markem 7,251 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 5 minutes ago, The Dude said: Players travel outside the 'sporting bubble' regularly. When Barisic travels to join the Croatian squad, hes outside the bubble. Ach come on now you, understand you like to entirely derail threads with bizzare arguments. Not this thread though, not now. Way and play at yer ain bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.