Jump to content

them


MisterC

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bluenoz said:

What's the point of falsifying transfer fees when the actual fees comes out in the year end accounts?

I don't get the motive or logic behind that.

 

Push the problem down the line. If you say it’s £20m then your fans believe that and say it’s a great deal. Not everyone will check 9 months later and it’s not as big of an issue by then anyway because people have moved on

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, magic8ball said:

You would think so ,The disco lights came from Sutton when he was having a pop at the lack of squad investment after a CL qualifier defeat .

It wasn’t complimentary.

Nope.

Their club twitter account called them disco lights :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GersInCanada said:

The myth of them being cash rich is well and truly gone. Big overdraft at the bank for the 2nd year running.

Income from player sales is bound to drop as they have little left to flog. 80M a year to run that shitshow beggars belief.

They get their tame media in inflate any transfer fees.

You don't care though eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, esquire8 said:

It's not really falsifying but more giving a figure that is the entire deal that includes future fees and clauses and contracts to show to their support and others that they still do big deals. They didn't get that full £20m+ upfront for Tierney and it's highly likely they didn't get the £15m upfront for Eduoard.

They literally did, it was in their last accounts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
×
×
  • Create New...