jamess 3,422 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 9 minutes ago, Virtuoso said: Possibility of being cited? I struggle to understand why we are joining in with the trial by camera on this form. Lets start a petition to get him banned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS4_wul 4,109 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 It's a red and fully expecting him to be cited for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoplandRoad83 3,251 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Lacked match sharpness all night, was frustrated at himself I think. I think he's a guy that needs regular games, don't think he suits rotation. Was miles off it when he started with us as well, albeit after an injury. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamie 4,841 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 You would think after last night's Clancy masterclass Mikey would be firmly under his rock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,714 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Just now, GOAT said: He can't the referee dealt with it at the game and booked him. He can if he is asked and says he didnt see an "exceptional part" of the challenge. He can say he never saw how high the foot planted and how endangering it actually was. Its bollocks, but there is a get out even if he booked him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted February 3, 2021 Author Share Posted February 3, 2021 Just now, jamess said: I struggle to understand why we are joining in with the trial by camera on this form. Lets start a petition to get him banned. I've always assumed this was a discussion forum... 🙄 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham 3,465 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Morelos' ban was borderline justifiable for them because it did differ from some bad challenges that haven't been cited. This was no different or at the very least not as bad as duffys or edwards and if they cite it, it will show complete and obvious bias against us - doubt he will be retrospectively punished. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 34,425 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, glasgow argyle said: Should have gone to specsavers Well, maybe you should go also then Jeff because...er...you couldn't see driving home the other night because you've...you don't even wear your glasses in...in...er...TV in case you get...you get slagged off so you just...er..you just stick to Specsavers and I'll do the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raging blue 1972 894 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 9 minutes ago, Virtuoso said: Is it a red though with no intent? 🤔 yep, doesn't matter - Doubt he'll be cited though as was not deliberate. Bit like when Alfie's leg got gashed. should add the ref thought a yellow was sufficient - some you win Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the brown brogue 1,909 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 First time I've seen that as my stream was all over the place, but Roofe's own reaction the way he punches the ground in frustration looks to me like he's expecting the worst. I'm sure all our friends in the media will be pushing the narrative that he's not that kind of player and he was just letting Davidson know he was there... Hopefully the fact he was booked is seen to be enough, but I fully expect a fast tracked citing and ban by Friday lunchtime. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,886 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 That’s a horror tackle. A leg breaker in all honesty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamess 3,422 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 1 minute ago, Virtuoso said: I've always assumed this was a discussion forum... 🙄 That's what the bbc would say. Just my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 7 minutes ago, Negri's lovechild said: That's never a red card offence. He's tried to position himself to shield the ball and turn. Caught the player but never intentional. He shouldn't be cited but I guess you never know with the authorities here. Weird thread for me .I can just imagine all the taigs starting threads on their own sites suggesting their players get red cards and bans .Fucking hell man .This place at times Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Lockin 3,909 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 5 minutes ago, IpswichGer said: Red Card as it is reckless, however Ref saw it and dished out a yellow. Definitely shouldn't be any further action but who knows with these cunts. false news Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrLaudrup 4,573 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 I don't think he can be cited as the referees saw the challenge a booked him during the game. Unless there is belief there was an intent to injure the player which would be difficult to prove. Usual media will have a great time analysing it to death. He'll feel bad when he watches it back. As poor a tackle as I've seen from one of us for a while though, couldn't complain if he was sent off. It happens sometimes. Poor timing and body position but I don't think malicious. The current environment has created a situation where we are all going mental trying to get each other's players cited. We did it with Brown last night, they will do it with Roofe. This is what happens with a process that lacks consistency or transparency and a media that chooses to focus on one side more than another. . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CumbernauldBear 234 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 5 minutes ago, glasgow argyle said: Should have gone to specsavers Should have been a yellow at worst ... and was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 53,771 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Just watch Sportscene later on and then we will know if he will face action or not 🙄 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,682 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 There's absolutely zero intent in it whatsoever and you've got hoards of they lot jumping on this as if they never got away with an intentional elbow and intentional dive last night. It's a bad one but not worth the outcry that's sure to follow... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1963 900 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Best not to comment and add to the clamour from the usual suspects Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 13,982 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 1 minute ago, eejay the dj said: Weird thread for me .I can just imagine all the taigs starting threads on their own sites suggesting their players get red cards and bans .Fucking hell man .This place at times The thread has been started with the intent of debate, which is healthy and I agree with but there are too many i think that try too hard to seem impartial and go way too far the other way and happy to jump to "it's a clear red". It's far from clear and I don't think a red. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,631 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 If u compare with what other forwards have got away with this season then this simply can't be cited Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 13,982 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 2 minutes ago, CumbernauldBear said: Should have been a yellow at worst ... and was. Agree. Clumsy but you can see the movement he was trying to make. Yellow and we move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Just now, Negri's lovechild said: The thread has been started with the intent of debate, which is healthy and I agree with but there are too many i think that try too hard to seem impartial and go way too far the other way and happy to jump to "it's a clear red". It's far from clear and I don't think a red. The OP is good poster mate but this subject could have been discussed without starting a thread on it .Just my opinion . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,631 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 He will be cited btw its the spfl last chance to help the scum apply pressure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the cry was no 3,033 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 4 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: Weird thread for me .I can just imagine all the taigs starting threads on their own sites suggesting their players get red cards and bans .Fucking hell man .This place at times Thought I'd been hyper-linked to Kerrydale ffs Assuming there's many imposters commenting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.