Kemar Roofe charged by SFA (2 Match Ban Confirmed)

[eejay the dj 31,964]

13 minutes ago, Sweetheart said:

The panel of three should be named, if they are passing judgments in the same capacity as CW did?

Is PL being considered for the CO position?

My money is on andrew waddel @willie young  being 2 of them 

[hammer93 15,055]

2 hours ago, Lord Lockin said:

no wae McGregor it wisnae - fuckin class 

Again McGregor was pointing out that he got two games for his follow through on Ferguson....another Rangers player cited...the system is there to punish one club and one club only....I have honestly lost count of the amount of challenges that have went unpunished 

[Sweetheart 8,458]

11 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

My money is on andrew waddel @willie young  being 2 of them 

This is a massive story.

if the panel of three are passing judgement then they should be named the same as CW to establish they have the correct legal qualification to pass judgement

Who is doing the legal side of the CO job?

Will recent judgement's stand if no-one was qualified?

In the wrong hands the system can be abused to control which players play. The whole league should be asking questions.

[hawkeye 1,039]

7 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

My money is on andrew waddel @willie young  being 2 of them 

Kenny Clark chairing the meeting.

[BearInTheToon 1,577]

Absolutely outrageous shit from the SFA.

So, again, you have to ask: who makes/can make a notice of complaint, how do you do it and what’s the overall process?

There needs to be complete transparency about this because right now, it looks like it only really applies to Rangers in the main.

Utterly corrupt.

[Lord Lockin 3,905]

Just now, hammer93 said:

Again McGregor was pointing out that he got two games for his follow through on Ferguson....another Rangers player cited...the system is there to punish one club and one club only....I have honestly lost count of the amount of challenges that have went unpunished 

I put footage up earlier on - fuck knows where 

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,479]

51 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

I don’t see why the sfa (fans) should be paying three former refs when a match day refs fee should include reviewing the full game and only then the ref match day ref then decides if it was missed or not.

Absolutely no chance now that matchday refs review incidents they dealt with and say "aye i fucked up" that would cost them their decent wedge they earn as they'd end up demoted every second week

[eejay the dj 31,964]

4 minutes ago, Sweetheart said:

This is a massive story.

if the panel of three are passing judgement then they should be named the same as CW to establish they have the correct legal qualification to pass judgement

Who is doing the legal side of the CO job?

Will recent judgement's stand if no-one was qualified?

In the wrong hands the system can be abused to control which players play. The whole league should be asking questions.

Well worded post SW and one i totally agree with 

[coopsleftboot 5,512]

Amount on here that think it’s a sending off is mental.  No intent, not late, not dangerous.  Simply a split second between Roofe getting his body between man and ball, something, as coaches, we drum into kids.  A split second where the opponent got a leg in...and came together.  It was no Simpson on Durrant type.  Anyone that’s played the game or coached knows exactly what happened here.  In fact had Roofe been a split second quicker, Davidson would likely have clattered into the back of Roofe, winning the foul...which apart from protecting the ball, is one of the reasons why we coach this.  

[eejay the dj 31,964]

51 minutes ago, hawkeye said:

Kenny Clark chairing the meeting.

Kenny clark was a well known bheast lover from Dumbarton . So you may have something there mate 

[Quiet Jim 897]

3 hours ago, RFCRobertson said:

You could make a sound arguement its a red but for fuck sake the compliance officer is just so random. Why have they just started popping up now looking at cases? There has been multiple incidents that couldve been citied. Luckily we have itten and Defoe still and we seem to be firing from all over the park. But it could effect the overall balance of the team and how we strech teams and pull defences. 

Our games are now subject to retrospective refereeing. The referee dealt with it, so I believe the club will fight this one.

This is their parting shot after the magic random computer gave us no chance of being ahead at the beginning of February.

Against all odds, we will win our 55, whilst taking down Lawell, Lennon, Brown and Griffiths all at the same time.

Next up, destroy the SFA and SPFL board.

Fuck them all and put them to the sword, the future is Orange.

Over the last ten years, there was only one true cry. It was NO SURRENDER.

Celtic have imploded, so have their followers, greeting like entitled cunts, Pussies!

 

 

 

[hawkeye 1,039]

14 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Kenny clark was a well know bheast lover from Dumbarton . So you may have something there mate 

He is from Clydebank and correct he is rabid  even though he is a prod.

[Bristol loyal 6,248]

3 hours ago, McEwan's Lager said:

It's getting ridiculous now. Yes its a red card and yes the ref got it wrong but if you are going to go to all this time and effort why don't you just have VAR in the first place.

Because VAR would have to ref the taigs aswell. Compliance officer/ sfa can pick and chose which games and players to punish...

[eejay the dj 31,964]

Just now, hawkeye said:

He is from Clydebank and correct he is rabid  even though he is a prod.

Maybe that's how we won so  many games with him . Was he not originally from Dumbarton . I definitely know he worked there as a Solicitor . Not the worst tbf , yet your point stands . It will be 3 favourable refs for the bheasts . 100%

[Smile 26,600]

Another young black man persecuted by the Man.

 

 

[hawkeye 1,039]

8 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Maybe that's how we won so  many games with him . Was he not originally from Dumbarton . I definitely know he worked there as a Solicitor . Not the worst tbf , yet your point stands . It will be 3 favourable refs for the bheasts . 100%

Knew him well as a teenager  , loved them hated us.

He worked in the Altlantis Bar on Kilbowie Road during his summer holidays from Uni.

He is from Clydebank and worked for Dumbarton lawyers so was  surprised when he was always described as a referee from Paisley !

Think  he lived in Paisley after he got married.

[Bad Robot 21,132]

5 minutes ago, Smile said:

Another young black man persecuted by the Man.

 

 

Who Kunta Kinte ?

[Lord Lockin 3,905]

Just now, Bad Robot said:

Who Kunta Kinte ?

Al Jolson 

[Ivybank 4,573]

Roofe, Alfredo and Defoe out of the Killie game😞

unless we contest the roofe decision 

[Hadron Collider 30,765]

2 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

Who Kunta Kinte ?

Plays for Chelsea. 

[Bad Robot 21,132]

3 minutes ago, Lord Lockin said:

Al Jolson 

😂

[Bad Robot 21,132]

1 minute ago, Hadron Collider said:

Plays for Chelsea. 

😂

[Master_Betty 340]

1 hour ago, Bill8972 said:

So far this season in the SPFL there has been 3945 fouls committed, 297 by us and 439 yellow cards, 21 by us.  Out of them only 4 have been charged retrospectively with violent conduct by the compliance officer, 2 x Morelos, 1 x Roofe and 1 x Holt (Livingston). 

It's quite a coincidence that they found three they could charge retrospectively with violent conduct out of 297 fouls committed by us, but only managed to find one out of 3648 fouls committed by the rest of the league put together!

Great Post. And to express it a different way, if my mental arithmetic is right....

Over 1% of the fouls we make end up getting punished further by a compliance officer compared to the average for all other teams of around 0.03%.

Or another way to say: our fouls are more than 30 times more likely to receive retrospective punishment.

That is fucking outrageous!!

[Bad Robot 21,132]

4 minutes ago, Ivybank said:

Roofe, Alfredo and Defoe out of the Killie game😞

unless we contest the roofe decision 

Did SG say Defoe is out Killie as I thought he just said Defoe would miss Hamilton with a calf issue and that was it?

[RFCRobertson 11,768]

38 minutes ago, coopsleftboot said:

Amount on here that think it’s a sending off is mental.  No intent, not late, not dangerous.  Simply a split second between Roofe getting his body between man and ball, something, as coaches, we drum into kids.  A split second where the opponent got a leg in...and came together.  It was no Simpson on Durrant type.  Anyone that’s played the game or coached knows exactly what happened here.  In fact had Roofe been a split second quicker, Davidson would likely have clattered into the back of Roofe, winning the foul...which apart from protecting the ball, is one of the reasons why we coach this.  

Issue is is the games changed and any "heavy" tackle on the leg can be deemed as dangerous...but again there hasn't been any consistency showed with this which makes it frustrating especially when you consider something like Edwards tackle on Morelos. Yet Ryan Jack going into a 50/50 with Stevie may, stevie may being a shitebag and pulling out resulting in a nasty looking tackle gets Jack red carded. 
 

Whats more dangerous about Roofes challenge that Edwards wasn't as dangerous to warrent retrospectively changing it. If dangerous tackles are going to be red card offences then am fairly certain at least 5 players every game day would be getting red carded on the park or retrospectively

and further add in, what is deemed as "dangerous", is it studs showing, height of the challenge, speed it happens at, the sizes of the footballers involved, weather considerations or purely the theatrics afterwards. At which point, can someone who takes a "nasty tackle" (either intentionally or not) almost commit simulation in order to get someone red carded.