Sportscene

[.Williamson. 82,009]

They covered it briefly in last nights coverage. They agreed it was offside 

[G.E.C. 18,714]

In all honesty I don’t get why Sportscene and MOTD is still a thing.

You can get highlights instantly on YouTube.

[trueblue 64 613]

23 minutes ago, G.E.C. said:

In all honesty I don’t get why Sportscene and MOTD is still a thing.

You can get highlights instantly on YouTube.

Can't understand why live tv is still a thing outside of sporting events, who wants to be told when to watch something when you can view it anytime at your leisure.

[Laudrupsleftfoot 10,778]

Whether the programme's shite or not it's a bit bizarre anyone can view the reply of Colak's goal and think it's offside, or not cover what should have been a sending off.

[The Dude 20,026]

3 hours ago, G.E.C. said:

In all honesty I don’t get why Sportscene and MOTD is still a thing.

You can get highlights instantly on YouTube.

 Not officially, you can’t. Unless it’s on TV, highlights can’t go online until midnight for SPFL clubs. In England, don’t think there are any highlights for non TV games until 10pm

[Rangers Da 1872 61]

3 hours ago, trueblue 64 said:

Can't understand why live tv is still a thing outside of sporting events, who wants to be told when to watch something when you can view it anytime at your leisure.

[Blue72 1,098]

Incredible we were EL finalists looking at all the hard evidence of multiple conspiratorial groups at various organisations plotting against us. 

 

[Roy Hobbs 2,159]

14 hours ago, The Dude said:

 Not officially, you can’t. Unless it’s on TV, highlights can’t go online until midnight for SPFL clubs. In England, don’t think there are any highlights for non TV games until 10pm

I think most of the EPL games are on sky YouTube shortly after full time.

[Rowley Birkin 8,601]

On 01/08/2022 at 00:30, Bad Robot said:

im calling bullshit on that, nothing more than a mouthpiece putting out what hes told by his masters hoping it'll placate the fans 

[Swagger 7,889]

20 hours ago, G.E.C. said:

In all honesty I don’t get why Sportscene and MOTD is still a thing.

You can get highlights instantly on YouTube.

That’s it exactly. Aside from the fact they hate our club the coverage and pundits are shite. 
There are a million ways to view our games or goals - sportscene shouldn’t be one of them. 
 

 

[J-Maestro 11,025]

2 hours ago, Rowley Birkin said:

im calling bullshit on that, nothing more than a mouthpiece putting out what hes told by his masters hoping it'll placate the fans 

Would probably trust Sportscene over that cunt. 

[Vision 16,725]

Good analysis of all four goals, good words about Tillman on his movement and goal. 

Surprise surprise Colak was offside  but they didn't dwell on it.

[ianferguson 2,619]

44 minutes ago, Vision said:

Good analysis of all four goals, good words about Tillman on his movement and goal. 

Surprise surprise Colak was offside  but they didn't dwell on it.

Been watching football for over 50 yrs and just found out today you can be offside from a backwards pass.

[Vision 16,725]

3 minutes ago, ianferguson said:

Been watching football for over 50 yrs and just found out today you can be offside from a backwards pass.

SSB will be red hot on Monday wie the refs letting us win 

[MVRanger 2,604]

Colak was definitely offside -  it's the position of the player regardless  of the direction of the ball. These ones are very rarely picked up but will become more prevalent when VAR comes in.

[DMax399 3,685]

23 minutes ago, ianferguson said:

Been watching football for over 50 yrs and just found out today you can be offside from a backwards pass.

Is that right?  Never thought you could be offside from a backwards pass, as the rule is you have to be closer to an opponent’s goal line than both the ball and the second last player (or wording like that).  So if the ball comes back the way, you physically couldn’t be closer to their goal line and therefore not offside.  Or has something changed?

[J-Maestro 11,025]

11 minutes ago, DMax399 said:

Is that right?  Never thought you could be offside from a backwards pass, as the rule is you have to be closer to an opponent’s goal line than both the ball and the second last player (or wording like that).  So if the ball comes back the way, you physically couldn’t be closer to their goal line and therefore not offside.  Or has something changed?

Wasn't a backwards pass though?

[Swagger 7,889]

On 01/08/2022 at 14:05, G.E.C. said:

In all honesty I don’t get why Sportscene and MOTD is still a thing.

You can get highlights instantly on YouTube.

I don’t get why people watch Sportscene. Shite coverage, shite pundits.

[Roy Hobbs 2,159]

17 minutes ago, DMax399 said:

Is that right?  Never thought you could be offside from a backwards pass, as the rule is you have to be closer to an opponent’s goal line than both the ball and the second last player (or wording like that).  So if the ball comes back the way, you physically couldn’t be closer to their goal line and therefore not offside.  Or has something changed?

Why can't you be closer to the goal line than the player playing the ball?

[Drumloyal 14,924]

47 minutes ago, Roy Hobbs said:

Why can't you be closer to the goal line than the player playing the ball?

Thought it was always that there needs to be 2 opposition players between the ball receiver and the goal unless the passing player was also beyond those oppo players. 

Cunts keep changing it though so I'm probably wrong. 

[Brubear 2,905]

1 hour ago, DMax399 said:

Is that right?  Never thought you could be offside from a backwards pass, as the rule is you have to be closer to an opponent’s goal line than both the ball and the second last player (or wording like that).  So if the ball comes back the way, you physically couldn’t be closer to their goal line and therefore not offside.  Or has something changed?

I think if you are behind the ball when it is played back and by inference behind the player playing thd ball you are OK but if you are ahead of the ball and come back to get it then you ard offside even if ball went backwards. 

[ZZed 4,510]

 

[ZZed 4,510]

rules that I found on tinternet. best I could do.

A simple interpretation of it is that to remain onside an attacking player must:

1. Be in their own half of the field; or if they’re not

2. Have the ball played to them while they are level with the second-last defender(forward pass); or

3. While there are at least two opposition defending players between them and the goal(forward pass).

An attacking player does not commit an offence when they receive the ball directly from:

1. Goal kicks

2. Corner kicks

3. Throw-ins

4. Dropped balls

Also, it’s not an offside offence if the attacking player plays a ball that was last deliberately played by an opponent.

What this means is an offside player doesn’t commit an offence in situations like:

• Latching onto the ball after a deliberate tackle by an opponent

• Latching onto a misplaced pass from an opponent

an attacking player isn’t offside if:

• They are involved with or influence play in any way from their own half

• They receive a backwards pass. For example, from a teammate closer to the opposition goal line than them.

[Dickie 12,905]

16 minutes ago, ZZed said:

rules that I found on tinternet. best I could do.

A simple interpretation of it is that to remain onside an attacking player must:

1. Be in their own half of the field; or if they’re not

2. Have the ball played to them while they are level with the second-last defender(forward pass); or

3. While there are at least two opposition defending players between them and the goal(forward pass).

An attacking player does not commit an offence when they receive the ball directly from:

1. Goal kicks

2. Corner kicks

3. Throw-ins

4. Dropped balls

Also, it’s not an offside offence if the attacking player plays a ball that was last deliberately played by an opponent.

What this means is an offside player doesn’t commit an offence in situations like:

• Latching onto the ball after a deliberate tackle by an opponent

• Latching onto a misplaced pass from an opponent

an attacking player isn’t offside if:

• They are involved with or influence play in any way from their own half

• They receive a backwards pass. For example, from a teammate closer to the opposition goal line than them.

Reading this is worse than watching sportscene.

[Leftpegcoopz11 4,671]

3 hours ago, DMax399 said:

Is that right?  Never thought you could be offside from a backwards pass, as the rule is you have to be closer to an opponent’s goal line than both the ball and the second last player (or wording like that).  So if the ball comes back the way, you physically couldn’t be closer to their goal line and therefore not offside.  Or has something changed?

It's a difficult one, Colak came back from an offside position when the ball was played, which usually means offside.

Maybe there is a rule change I'm missing, but like I said before, I think Colak had a perfectly "online" header disallowed in a previous game, so it evens itself out. 

Edit: when Matondo slid in the ball went straight across or "slightly" back so that could maybe be a factor why he wasn't off, as it wasn't a forward pass.