Lundstram red appealed

[G.E.C. 19,594]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/62630390

[Malkytfp1 19,666]

If this isn't overturned be as well shutting the game down.

[graeme_4 37,616]

Looks like we haven’t appealed Morelos.

[NI 930]

Vital player for us, I really hope these corrupted people accept it.

[sassaaaa 11,406]

It will be rescinded but Collum has done his work and he knows we will say fuck all about him.

[G.E.C. 19,594]

3 minutes ago, graeme_4 said:

Looks like we haven’t appealed Morelos.

I don’t think VAR would have overturned that tbh, can understand why we’ve not appealed.

[G.E.C. 19,594]

Just now, sassaaaa said:

It will be rescinded but Collum has done his work and he knows we will say fuck all about him.

Last time we did we got a £6k fine.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 55,393]

If Collum is asked for an opinion on it, I reckon he'll maintain its justified.

[graeme_4 37,616]

2 minutes ago, G.E.C. said:

I don’t think VAR would have overturned that tbh, can understand why we’ve not appealed.

So can I. Quite a few adamant on here that it was a booking. 

[sassaaaa 11,406]

1 minute ago, G.E.C. said:

Last time we did we got a £6k fine.

When you consider the shite we waste cash on this would be money well spent.

[KingKirk 26,501]

Any word from Rangers on the referee and his performance at the weekend? 

[Howsitgoing 4,281]

Appeal Morelos also and just put the reasoning as the ref being fucking useless. 

[KeyserSoze 15,280]

1 minute ago, KingKirk said:

Any word from Rangers on the referee and his performance at the weekend? 

Why?

[Colin Traive 23,864]

Just watched MOTD2 from last night.

de Bruyne taken out by Newcastle defender at halfway line.

Like Lundstram, it was a transition foul, purely to stop opponents breaking. No malice, no injury.

Red card issued in haste but the referee checked with VAR and correctly changed it to yellow.

Of course, we’ll never know if anyone would ever have said: “er, Willie, ye want another look at that?” or if Father Collum would ever have applied the laws correctly but blatant bias like this needs to be tackled.

Meanwhile we continue living in the dark ages…

[leam_baw 166]

If we appeal Morelos, it lets him think he’s done no wrong. 

[Bad Robot 21,513]

with the red mist now gone I think JL’s is a yellow with the current rules 

AM is still a red though and with all things considered this was a ridiculous bit of play by AM. One puts us down to 9 and second we need minutes in his legs but he fkd it for the team, us the support and for his own fitness.  

[KingKirk 26,501]

18 minutes ago, KeyserSoze said:

Why?

We've been shafted again by a ref that has previous with our players. 

[superallysbears 8,211]

Morelos one was red and if it wasn't then his rep made it so, I'd be astonished if the Lundstram was not downgraded to yellow, if it isn't maybe some will start to take note of what's going on here with certain referee's.

[KingKirk 26,501]

8 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

with the red mist now gone I think JL’s is a yellow with the current rules 

AM is still a red though and with all things considered this was a ridiculous bit of play by AM. One puts us down to 9 and second we need minutes in his legs but he fkd it for the team, us the support and for his own fitness.  

Am fed up with morelos tbh it was a act of stupidity again and he let everyone down. Its the sniggering and shit afterwards that really pissed me off tho. Nobody would buy him just now but I'd sell tbh

[McEwan's Lager 32,072]

Not sure if we will be successful. 

Think he will be done by the attempt at excessive force clause of the rules because he isn't challenging for the ball.

[rabc10000 5,094]

1 minute ago, McEwan's Lager said:

Not sure if we will be successful. 

Think he will be done by the excessive force clause of the rules because he isn't challenging for the ball.

Then hit with an extra games ban on top for appealing it, making him miss the game against they cunts 

[Prso's headband 36,807]

3 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said:

Not sure if we will be successful. 

Think he will be done by the excessive force clause of the rules because he isn't challenging for the ball.

You’d be correct if that was the line from the usual suspects but literally everyone who has commented on it, including Andy Walker has said it was the wrong decision. 
 

I can’t see it being upheld 

[RoboBearToo 403]

Not too sure of the rules, but the fact that there didn't seem to be an atempt to play the ball could go against us

[Rangers_no1 34,531]

6 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said:

Not sure if we will be successful. 

Think he will be done by the excessive force clause of the rules because he isn't challenging for the ball.

It wasn't excessive force though, so would be ludicrous to let it stand.

I would be astonished if its not downgraded to a yellow. 

[BlueSuedeSambas 56,413]

45 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

Any word from Rangers on the referee and his performance at the weekend? 

We’ve raised concerns about Collum with the SFA.