Jump to content

General Transfer Talk


Broxi

Recommended Posts

Just now, The Specky Non Liar - Sometimes said:

What's your top 5?

In no particular order:

Talking about players "getting it" or players being winners or losers based on whether we just won or lost. You can be a winner with a great attitude and lose or be shit at football and you can be a loser with a bad attitude and still win. It almost always means nothing when people say it. 

Hammer throwers of Scottish football.

Anything about refereeing or governing body conspiracies

Overhyping youth players because they made a 5 yard pass. Don't need a new striker because we should give players like Ure a chance. 

Pacey/technical/good dribbler players are useless signings against 10 men behind the ball teams 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Broxi said:

In no particular order:

Talking about players "getting it" or players being winners or losers based on whether we just won or lost. You can be a winner with a great attitude and lose or be shit at football and you can be a loser with a bad attitude and still win. It almost always means nothing when people say it. 

Hammer throwers of Scottish football.

Anything about refereeing or governing body conspiracies

Overhyping youth players because they made a 5 yard pass. Don't need a new striker because we should give players like Ure a chance. 

Pacey/technical/good dribbler players are useless signings against 10 men behind the ball teams 

Disagree with the first one, agree with the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Broxi said:

In no particular order:

Talking about players "getting it" or players being winners or losers based on whether we just won or lost. You can be a winner with a great attitude and lose or be shit at football and you can be a loser with a bad attitude and still win. It almost always means nothing when people say it. 

Hammer throwers of Scottish football.

Anything about refereeing or governing body conspiracies

Overhyping youth players because they made a 5 yard pass. Don't need a new striker because we should give players like Ure a chance. 

Pacey/technical/good dribbler players are useless signings against 10 men behind the ball teams 

Could definitely add people constantly wanting first team players dropped for squad players who are nowhere near as good to that list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Broxi said:

In no particular order:

Talking about players "getting it" or players being winners or losers based on whether we just won or lost. You can be a winner with a great attitude and lose or be shit at football and you can be a loser with a bad attitude and still win. It almost always means nothing when people say it. 

Hammer throwers of Scottish football.

Anything about refereeing or governing body conspiracies

Overhyping youth players because they made a 5 yard pass. Don't need a new striker because we should give players like Ure a chance. 

Pacey/technical/good dribbler players are useless signings against 10 men behind the ball teams 

Can we add in teams not trying against Celtic while trying harder against us? :lol:

Also team A can have a grass pitch, why don't team B?

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Broxi said:

In no particular order:

Talking about players "getting it" or players being winners or losers based on whether we just won or lost. You can be a winner with a great attitude and lose or be shit at football and you can be a loser with a bad attitude and still win. It almost always means nothing when people say it. 

Hammer throwers of Scottish football.

Anything about refereeing or governing body conspiracies

Overhyping youth players because they made a 5 yard pass. Don't need a new striker because we should give players like Ure a chance. 

Pacey/technical/good dribbler players are useless signings against 10 men behind the ball teams 

Only seen this being applied to pacey players who aren’t that technical or able to dribble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Specky Non Liar - Sometimes said:

Don't get this logic at all.

Boyd didn't really cause them any grief and was one of our best buys.

Also the CL qualifiers goal must count as a big game imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OrangeRab said:

Beale spoke a week ago on talksport about needing to add more pace and physicality into the team 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Somemightsay7 said:

Willock doesn't even get a game for QPR.

He would be a horrendous signing.

He can keep Yilmaz company on the treatment table discussing their hamstring problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, King Jela said:

Can't remember Walter moaning about the league being too physical. 

I'll take his opinion on football over Beale's. 

So would I 👍. But that wasn’t the discussion. It was just whether the spl is more physical and less technical than other leagues in Europe. I doubt Walter would disagree. Tbh surprised anyone would disagree who has watched a match in La Liga and watched a match in the spl

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OrangeRab said:

So would I 👍. But that wasn’t the discussion. It was just whether the spl is more physical and less technical than other leagues in Europe. I doubt Walter would disagree. Tbh surprised anyone would disagree who has watched a match in La Liga and watched a match in the spl

That wasn't the discussion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

Can't be spending £5m on someone who hasn't turned up in a big game since August. 

20 year old exciting prospect who is probably gonna pick up player of the year awards for us and will only become better. If you can't spend £5m on that then what can you spend it on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Specky Non Liar - Sometimes said:

That wasn't the discussion.

It was. You might have chosen to be deliberately obtuse and take it too literally. Nobody thinks that every player in the league is incapable of passing a football and can only make thuggish challenges. 

Anyways back to the original point. I can see why he might want to move to another league which is less physical, better pitches, more technical and where he gets more protection from refs. Absolutely a possibility

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

Rather the worst Ibrox has ever been than what's on offer at Livi, Killie and Hamilton. 

You watch many games involving them outside ours?

If it saves those clubs £500k+ a year on training facilities and lets them generate more revenue then fair play to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 03 October 2024 19:00 Until 21:00
      0  
      Rangers v Lyon
      Ibrox Stadium
      UEFA Europa League
×
×
  • Create New...