Thermopylae 15,286 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 In an interview for Inside Sport Gordon Smith was saying that there are more Scots registered in the Champions League this year than English, despite them having twice as many teams. Perhaps this more than anything is responsible for the upsurge in the form of the national team? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 15,990 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Interesting, perhaps those years of overspending have finally come home to roost, leaving clubs with no choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 I noticed that yonks ago when I saw the team sheets for the different teams, some commentator was saying something about it and I was shouting at the TV we've got more players and on top of that it is even higher when you make it an aggregate figure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibroxwonder 0 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 My mate was saying that can't be right... so, being me, and being bored at uni, I checked... 40 English registered, compared to 47 Scots (that includes the B list seeing as they are registered players) It's great to see ^_^ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 761 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 Poor stats Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
superally07 387 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 In The Rangers News the other week it said there was like 28 English and 27 Scottish. It was on a articale about Beasly coz hes the only listed american ( adu is listed under sumfin else cant remember why ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_RFC87 761 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 In The Rangers News the other week it said there was like 28 English and 27 Scottish. It was on a articale about Beasly coz hes the only listed american ( adu is listed under sumfin else cant remember why ) Ghanian? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Newells Sexist Army 2 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 In The Rangers News the other week it said there was like 28 English and 27 Scottish. It was on a articale about Beasly coz hes the only listed american ( adu is listed under sumfin else cant remember why ) Think that was probably numbers in the actual squads for those games. Gordon Smith's talking about numbers registered as eligible to play, which includes some reserves and the like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
superally07 387 Posted November 20, 2007 Share Posted November 20, 2007 In The Rangers News the other week it said there was like 28 English and 27 Scottish. It was on a articale about Beasly coz hes the only listed american ( adu is listed under sumfin else cant remember why ) Think that was probably numbers in the actual squads for those games. Gordon Smith's talking about numbers registered as eligible to play, which includes some reserves and the like. yeah ur probley right mate , Either way for us to have 1 less or even more is incredible I think. All thanks to the old firm ofcourse. and Fair play Man u , Arsenal, Chelsea Are doing gd but Rangers humped Lyon away from home , Celtic beat the champions. so no1 can say its bad for us the amount of home grown players weer playin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts