krisyrfc 0 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 i dont thing rangers are gonna get any more entertaining, we need 2 pacey tricky wingers but walter wouldnt get them because wingers cant defend !!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosesMcNeil 1,664 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 i dont thing rangers are gonna get any more entertaining, we need 2 pacey tricky wingers but walter wouldnt get them because wingers cant defend !!! Brian Laudrup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Efrem Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric_Caldow 60 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 i dont thing rangers are gonna get any more entertaining, we need 2 pacey tricky wingers but walter wouldnt get them because wingers cant defend !!! Hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahah................................................ prick. Anything constructive to say to a Rangers forum? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer 124 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Come on lads, Charlie adam looks rather wide to me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazzas_Flute 11 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Aye , Walter will not buy wide players because they can't defend , Good one . He bought 3 strikers who can't defend ? Thats your logic fucked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric_Caldow 60 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Aye , Walter will not buy wide players because they can't defend , Good one . He bought 3 strikers who can't defend ? Thats your logic fucked. Now, now, don't mock. He can't help straying into the wrong end.......................................... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mannan 0 Posted August 5, 2008 Share Posted August 5, 2008 Aye , Walter will not buy wide players because they can't defend , Good one . He bought 3 strikers who can't defend ? Thats your logic fucked. in all honestly hes got 7 strikers with a maximum or 3 that cant play at one time, least bar the very start of the game, and his favourite formation is 4-5-1 i would say smiths logic is fucked........and yours lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
krisyrfc 0 Posted August 5, 2008 Author Share Posted August 5, 2008 strikers are not wingers dickheads, he needs to have all his midfield defending not strikers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaD CoW 3 Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 That be any team that's not us then! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris_glasgow 2 Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 Efrem hes 17 he will get a game in 15 years time depressing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted August 6, 2008 Share Posted August 6, 2008 Efrem hes 17 he will get a game in 15 years time depressing Efrem would run at full backs . Turn in side then back out and go for the line . whip the ball in . Walter needs to get his finger out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts