boss3
-
Posts
21 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by boss3
-
-
You don't wear corduroy do you?
only when on this forum
-
Dennis obrien" CELTIC FC,
Talks have taken place regarding dennis obrien buying dermot desmonds 47%. Celtic will make an announcement on july 11th , obrien who is worth over 2 billion will invest in players but rumours are the manager will not be lennon. Talks took place in london on mon/tues/weds and the takeover will go through the stock exchange early next week. Dennis obrien will also bring in a KLM SPONSORSHIP DEAL, Scottish football will be rocked with his investment thought to be around 40m ! Dennis will also pull the deal with trappatoni whos wages he funds! This is why the job of a new manager is taking so long, he has his own ideas all that remains to be done is for dermot desmond to sellup
No much happen at chapel today then?
Funny how it's guys with only a few posts who come up with sort of thing isn't it
yes the one with so few posts who told you all the ellis story was about to break
just look on there now and again post on two other forums
-
Dennis obrien" CELTIC FC,
Talks have taken place regarding dennis obrien buying dermot desmonds 47%. Celtic will make an announcement on july 11th , obrien who is worth over 2 billion will invest in players but rumours are the manager will not be lennon. Talks took place in london on mon/tues/weds and the takeover will go through the stock exchange early next week. Dennis obrien will also bring in a KLM SPONSORSHIP DEAL, Scottish football will be rocked with his investment thought to be around 40m ! Dennis will also pull the deal with trappatoni whos wages he funds! This is why the job of a new manager is taking so long, he has his own ideas all that remains to be done is for dermot desmond to sell–up
-
other pposters from follow follow have already bored us with this "exclusive" so we know the details but there is no proof it ever happened.....
So, like your "exclusive " on this thread, it was posted on follow follow first.....
never said it was an exclusive just what i was told over a week ago, put it on here as it looked a good forum and it appeared to be the only site without the story, I would not come on with a first post like that if I did not know it was 100% right
as far as our best player is concerned it did happen fact.
and never posted on ff but do on two other forums
-
can someone explain the "massive" MIH debt that will magically appear on the accounts
that someone keeps mentioningNot had time to read the whole thread, but I agree with you mate, I do wish people would separate the debt of RFC from the debt of MiH, our debt as a football club is approximately 31 million, possibly a bit less by now, this has nothing to do with any overall debt that MiH might have. There is no way on this earth from a legal perspective that "new" debts can appear on Rangers' books.
Report the other day (Herald?) suggested that the alleged £33m bid from Ellis et al was intended to cover the now £27m debt, plus the £6m which Murray bought the club for.
Yeah, read that in one of the articles also, and as other people have mentioned there is still the operating costs for the remainder of the season to be taken into consideration.
If the debt is now down to £27 million, which sounds more plausible to me, then £4 million of the declared profits has gone to the debt and the remainder for wages etc for the remainder of the season.
I dont know, the thing with this "debt" lark is this...
My understanding is that there are 2 things in place, one being a "business plan" agreed with Lloyds, which, in laymans terms is simple a working practice to ensure we "live within our means" (which is very sensible) and, dont take credit facilities as a way to create working capitol, more or less.
The second, more important part that almost EVERYONE seems to miss/ignore/not realise, is that our "debt" is being handled in the exact same manner as a mortgage, or, more accurately, a reducing overdraft. We reduce it by £1million per year, THAT is our agreement. We dont "need" to give them anything else. This is the amount we have to spend, basically, so, if we make profit, and, are not as far into the "overdraft", then, we have more to spend, but, the "official amount" will reduce by £1million per year. Its pretty simple. Thats why it ws stated we could buy someone if we wanted to, and, also why we didnt have to sell players in the window, because it doesnt go directly to the bank
Thats also the reason the amount is being taken into account when it comes to a sale, because, technically, if we made £20 mil this season in pure profit, we would have the same amount to play with, less £1 million. Although, I am sure that these amounts would change with a new owner and new credit facilities. MIH's crap position are part of the reason they are being strict with us
Have to add though, if someone is offering murray the £6 mil he originally paid, thats fantastic!! And funny
Davies was touted to at leased one EPL team in the last window
Forest denied negotiating a lease with anyone.
i hate that , can't even spell our best players name correctly 
with over 1200 posts you will know who our best player was touted to and by who and how much
-
can someone explain the "massive" MIH debt that will magically appear on the accounts
that someone keeps mentioningNot had time to read the whole thread, but I agree with you mate, I do wish people would separate the debt of RFC from the debt of MiH, our debt as a football club is approximately 31 million, possibly a bit less by now, this has nothing to do with any overall debt that MiH might have. There is no way on this earth from a legal perspective that "new" debts can appear on Rangers' books.
Report the other day (Herald?) suggested that the alleged £33m bid from Ellis et al was intended to cover the now £27m debt, plus the £6m which Murray bought the club for.
Yeah, read that in one of the articles also, and as other people have mentioned there is still the operating costs for the remainder of the season to be taken into consideration.
If the debt is now down to £27 million, which sounds more plausible to me, then £4 million of the declared profits has gone to the debt and the remainder for wages etc for the remainder of the season.
I dont know, the thing with this "debt" lark is this...
My understanding is that there are 2 things in place, one being a "business plan" agreed with Lloyds, which, in laymans terms is simple a working practice to ensure we "live within our means" (which is very sensible) and, dont take credit facilities as a way to create working capitol, more or less.
The second, more important part that almost EVERYONE seems to miss/ignore/not realise, is that our "debt" is being handled in the exact same manner as a mortgage, or, more accurately, a reducing overdraft. We reduce it by £1million per year, THAT is our agreement. We dont "need" to give them anything else. This is the amount we have to spend, basically, so, if we make profit, and, are not as far into the "overdraft", then, we have more to spend, but, the "official amount" will reduce by £1million per year. Its pretty simple. Thats why it ws stated we could buy someone if we wanted to, and, also why we didnt have to sell players in the window, because it doesnt go directly to the bank
Thats also the reason the amount is being taken into account when it comes to a sale, because, technically, if we made £20 mil this season in pure profit, we would have the same amount to play with, less £1 million. Although, I am sure that these amounts would change with a new owner and new credit facilities. MIH's crap position are part of the reason they are being strict with us
Have to add though, if someone is offering murray the £6 mil he originally paid, thats fantastic!! And funny
Davies was touted to at leased one EPL team in the last window
-
Can I ask what else your mates, mate gets "wright" about rangers?
ok its write not wright
Thats a classic
I can't believe he wrote that! bwhahahaha :lol:dry your eyes son
-
remember guys be careful what you wish for . could well be the demon at the door from what ive heard
care to elaborate?
heard this is the guy murray met in a london hotel 2 years ago when sdm admitted the papers were on the table to
sign but he new if he signed that murray park was going to end up a housing estate
u think its defo the same guy?
SDM will have no input into who the buyer is.
-
Boss do you know anything new that was not in the papers today or even do you know what will be in the papers tommorow?
yes Cheryl Cole is thinking about moveing to LA, Jordan is also in the old US of A and the leader of the Glasgow City Council is or has moved abroad
sorry just intigrating into the forum
-
It should be pointed out that FF was a hundred and odd posts into a thread about this very "Exclusive" when Boss3 started this thread.
sorry would not take something of ff dry your eyes
Friday night, no school the next day, too many kids up late.
sorry not school saturday is a work day
-
Wud I be correct in saying that 1 of the media pundits on the radio said today that ellis formed the company RFC holdings in guernsey purely to buy rangers. Ie the company only exists for this reason. If this is correct then
I'd say this ellis guy is very serious about buying us and therefore it prob will happen and to be honest I hope it does, anythings Gota be better than current situation surely. Any1 confirm wat I said about a radio pundit saying this re the RFC holdings company?
YES
I thot so boss, just wasn't quite sure if I heard it right. I'm sure it was jim traynor or maybe daryl king, can't mind as I was flicking back and forth between the radio stations.
did not hear Daryl or Jim Traynor but yes RFC Guernsey
-
Wud I be correct in saying that 1 of the media pundits on the radio said today that ellis formed the company RFC holdings in guernsey purely to buy rangers. Ie the company only exists for this reason. If this is correct then I'd say this ellis guy is very serious about buying us and therefore it prob will happen and to be honest I hope it does, anythings Gota be better than current situation surely. Any1 confirm wat I said about a radio pundit saying this re the RFC holdings company?
YES
-
It should be pointed out that FF was a hundred and odd posts into a thread about this very "Exclusive" when Boss3 started this thread.
sorry would not take something of ff dry your eyes
-
the story is from a mate of a mate who is normally wright about all thinks Rangers
Deary fcuk.
yes deary fcuk
-
Can I ask what else your mates, mate gets "wright" about rangers?
ok its write not wright
regarding my mates we will see where this goes
:
: right!only kidding
Know you we're knot
maybe i was write/wright/right
-
Can I ask what else your mates, mate gets "wright" about rangers?
ok its write not wright
regarding my mates we will see where this goes
:
: right!only kidding
-
Can I ask what else your mates, mate gets "wright" about rangers?
ok its write not wright
regarding my mates we will see where this goes
-
Thought I would put it on here as it looked like one of the better forums by the responses I was obviously wrong
-
do not know if will it be good or bad for Rangers
it will be in the Record and Herald
-
A story may break tommorow Saturday 6st or Sunday about a buyer for Rangers dont know much about it
if I am wrong my apolpgies in advance
the story is from a mate of a mate who is normally wright about all thinks Rangers
Story sourced in Herald and Evening Times: Alleged £33million bid by Andrew Ellis, London property developer
i hate that , can't even spell our best players name correctly 
: right!
Dennis obrien" CELTIC FC,
in General Football & Sport
Posted
7000 posts and the best you can do is wanker
anyway will not be back for a while off to SA for the world cup some times work is just well great
ps
dont use this forum for anything Rangers you guys are not exactly in the know