Jump to content

jimgers

New Signing
  • Posts

    2,380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jimgers

  1. 6 hours ago, Bad Robot said:

    This is the part I don’t get with our fellow supporters as they seem to think it will be repealed but not ammened and certain chants or songs will be allowed. If it is repealed the ethos to only target our community will be done by amending any current secondary regulations.

    It seems a lot of our support are walking blindfolded into this which IMO is similar when the majority wanted to take our punishment as we got shafted and put down to the bottom leagues.

    No wonder the fenians are running with ball, inside and outside of football.

    The law is an Ass, but it's an equal Ass atm, that will 100% change.  The Tarriers will be given an exemption certificate from any future  legislation, however they are sneaky enough not to legislate, because they made such a feck up of this one. Allowing themselves to be caught up in it, It will probably revert back to the old rules. They will be allowed to attack in song the protestant community and make banners for proscribed terrorist organisations, Bears will still get done under the old rules, which are also also included in the current OBFA, no Billy Boys, no mention of murdering Fenian terrorists organisations and their Fenian supporters, glorifying in those atrocities. It's a stitch-up to placate the Fenians and by that i don't mean Catholic community, but rather the terrorist and their logistical and supply line supporter in Scotland.

  2. 6 hours ago, PRW. said:

    Even tho just as many bears get arrested as tarriers due to it

    right ye are

    Some mental posts in here 

    Many Bears were getting arrested before this law came in, and many Bears will get arrested after it's gone. The only difference is or was, the Tarriers were getting arrested under this law.  They won't when it's gone, anyone thinking any new legislation , their like mined people in the SNP,  judiciary and Police will bring in as a replacement.  Will include their terrorist glorification, political slogans and sectarian banners especially as they made such a mistake with this OBFA law, that allowed them to get caught up in it's legislation, is certainly mental. It will be our support and only our support that will be targeted, should they replace the current OBFA with a new RangersOBFA law.

  3. 22 hours ago, rbr said:

    Have to say as the second largest shareholder it's about time there was a seat on the board , I know this is controversial but no other shareholder of our size ,would put up with dealing with a club SLO .

    It's a poor show when the second largest shareholder in the club, has to go through channels to to get anything done for it's members.  We should have a open line to any director including King. You won't see the Parks contacting the SLO when they want something done.

  4. I'm a member of Club1872 and i think we are finally getting there, with some very good work being done. The only criticism i would  say is, Club1872 needs to be more assertive when dealing with the club, we are the second major shareholder in the club,  but it seems to me we go cap in hand to the board whenever we need something done. There are other shareholders with much less shares in the club than the support hold as a group, yet they  are treated with more respect. A lot more confidence in our position is needed, Club1872  board members with large Cajones required, apply within.

  5. There never has been or will be again, a better reason for vastly reducing their numbers than this. They have secretly and now openly worked and planned to steal our trophies and titles, caused untold damage to our club and continue to agitate for further punishment. Any club would be within it's rights to retaliate to such bigoted and damaging provocation, we as shareholders should be demanding at the very least, a move to restrict their poisonous presence when we play them at Ibrox. Get it done Rangers and get idone now.

×
×
  • Create New...