Jump to content

uloyalist1690

New Signing
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by uloyalist1690

    Juve at Murray Park

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    The only thing that belongs on "kerryfail" is your appalling grammar, your punctuation and your apparent obsession with paedophilia.

    The scum are playing in the last 16 of the Champions League. Instead of getting on with our business (which can include building relations and inviting Juve over - that's fine), we're releasing press statements and interviews about this shite. Let them have their day FFS, I'd rather that than us being in the limelight looking like a 'wee club' getting all excited to see a 'big club' in the flesh.

    Now fuck off ya beast.

    u really are a pleb

    Juve at Murray Park

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    Juve need to train somewhere, but i think it lacks class that A/We apparently offered the facilities and B/We somehow think its news worthy to the extent we publish it on our official site.

    All in all its a silly wee story that we should be above.

    your a pleb

    Scotland's Offensive Bill

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    I noticed that Gordon Waddell's column in the Sunday Mail raised a few eyebrows amongst our support. Probably blood pressure too. You have to hand it to the Scottish Press they don't just get things wrong, they get them terribly wrong.

    I said a while back that until they walk about in our shoes for a while, the differences in perception are going to poles apart. Actually, delete “poles” and insert “universes”. And while Keith Jackson was thumping out the old “forgive, forget and move on” melody, Leckie obviously didn't take my advice about shoes, and saw fit to describe Rangers as “offensive”. Furthermore he seems to suggest that we should be going on a “charm offensive”.

    Oh how I laughed. All the way to Waterstones in fact where I bought Leckie a copy of an English Dictionary. Because those universes seem to be keeping us galaxies apart in our interpretation of the word “offensive”.

    So let me get this right. The club who have been, and continue to be, treated unjustly by the Scottish Football authorities, who have been lied about in various press columns and in the media, who have been subjected to the most vicious and malicious witch hunt in the history of Scottish sport, should themselves be going on charm offensive ?

    You have to hand it to Leckie, as the ridiculous scale goes it's on a par with suggesting a rape victim deserved her fate because she happened to be wearing a short dress.

    Of course the “forgive, forget and move on” and the “Rangers are offensive” campaigns work well for the Scottish Press. They don't have to examine their own roles and failings in the witch hunt which was waged against Rangers. No need to address their own culpability, responsibility and failure to act as the “moral guardians of society”.

    Determining and treating someone as guilty before verdict, that to me is “offensive”. Offensive to the fundamental principle that a party should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

    Blackmailing a party to accept something which a Scottish Court has deemed unlawful, as a pre-requisite to granting a licence to play football – that to me is offensive.

    But perhaps most offensive of all is that coward's like Bill Leckie and his ilk fail to ask the questions of those who have abused their power, who are accused by many (outside the Rangers community) of bullying, intimidating and lying in their Machiavellian exploits, and yet continue to govern our national game.

    Seems Scotland has more than one “Offensive Bill”.

    Any where i go there are piles of daily rebel and the sun especially stacked and unsold, keep walking past, daily express much more neutral and anti- SNP

    Alistair Murning SFA panel member

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    Another one of the Cabals infantry by the looks of it. Spread the word bears, from FF.

    Remember this impartial member of the SFA panel tasked with dealing with Lord Nimmos findings against Rangers and Craig Whyte?

    Described at the time as the "erstwhile football commentator" in various pieces such as..

    http://www.telegraph....n-Rangers.html

    I discovered today during an unrelated conversation that the impartial Mr Murning is currently making his money organising "An Audience with Henrik Larsson" evenings in Glasgow and Ireland. His company World Celebrity Bookings are the events management company putting it all together.... It appears though that the only "World celebrity" on their books is the aforementioned hero of the green and greys.

    The link can be seen at... http://henriklarsson.co.uk/ which is a page forward from the site www.wcbookings.com which in turn is registered to impartial Mr Alistair Murning .... http://whois.domaint.../wcbookings.com

    ;looks like murning on that site got lots of links to thialand, eh the dark side spreading ther filth as usual

    A small subtle,but potentially effective campaign strategy against Daily Rhebe

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    Any time you're in a newsagent, hide the Rhebel behind the Sport, Mirror or Star.

    You'd be amazed at how a small thing could hit their circulation. If we all make a point of being that wee bit more obsessed about small actions that require little effort, but merely a reasonable sized consensus to have an effect, then you could effectively hit them. Your extra 5 seconds doing this, along with hundreds if not thousands of other Bears, could potentially cost them a fair whack.

    The same could be said of other papers, such as the Herald who have recently re-employer the Creep.

    I do that any time i c a taig top, it gets covered wy a gers top at every opportunity and any thing else related to the scum

    Any Accountants on Here Members of Accounting Web?

    in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom

    Posted

    A relative is a tax accountant.

    He sent me an article from Accounting Web stating, fairly factually, that HMRC were to appeal the First Tier verdict.

    More concerning was a comment at the end by a member going by the name of 'Culzane', part of which says:

    • 'as an aside, various witnesses form Rangers admitted that they did not give the SFA the 'side letters' given to the players which gave the players gurantees about getting their money and rangers would be liable for any tax due. tehy even admitted during this case that this was to circumvent the SFA registration process and effectively meant that these players were illegally registered and a tribunal was held last week headed by Lord Nimmo Smith to review these registrations and decide if Rangers would be stripped of titles for financial doping. ie the Lance Armstrong of Scottish Football.
    • there is wider relevance here as it also meant Rangers could have had players playing illegally in european competitions for a number of years and also prize money and champions league money they received should not have been due to them. this then brings up the compensation aspect agaisnt football authorities.
    • The current President of the SFA. (Scottish Football Association) was involved at Rangers in the registration of players to the SFA during the early years of this process and also received an EBT. His organisation will be in charge of the penalties to be given to Rangers which seems to be a very big conflict of interest.'

    Looks like one of the obsessed has posted this as all the buzzwords are in there, but it raises this question:

    If witnesses FOR Rangers admitted trying to circumvent the SFA registration process, then the kangaroo court of last week would be cut & dried in their favour already, wouldn't it?

    I don't believe what this guy claims happened for a minute, but have not read transcripts of the case, so can anybody out there refute this allegation?

    If so, can we get some sort of counter post out on this site? The propaganda is reaching well beyond Scotland now & stuff like this needs some kind of rebuttal from our end.

    A relative is a tax accountant.

    He sent me an article from Accounting Web stating, fairly factually, that HMRC were to appeal the First Tier verdict.

    More concerning was a comment at the end by a member going by the name of 'Culzane', part of which says:

    • 'as an aside, various witnesses form Rangers admitted that they did not give the SFA the 'side letters' given to the players which gave the players gurantees about getting their money and rangers would be liable for any tax due. tehy even admitted during this case that this was to circumvent the SFA registration process and effectively meant that these players were illegally registered and a tribunal was held last week headed by Lord Nimmo Smith to review these registrations and decide if Rangers would be stripped of titles for financial doping. ie the Lance Armstrong of Scottish Football.
    • there is wider relevance here as it also meant Rangers could have had players playing illegally in european competitions for a number of years and also prize money and champions league money they received should not have been due to them. this then brings up the compensation aspect agaisnt football authorities.
    • The current President of the SFA. (Scottish Football Association) was involved at Rangers in the registration of players to the SFA during the early years of this process and also received an EBT. His organisation will be in charge of the penalties to be given to Rangers which seems to be a very big conflict of interest.'

    Looks like one of the obsessed has posted this as all the buzzwords are in there, but it raises this question:

    If witnesses FOR Rangers admitted trying to circumvent the SFA registration process, then the kangaroo court of last week would be cut & dried in their favour already, wouldn't it?

    I don't believe what this guy claims happened for a minute, but have not read transcripts of the case, so can anybody out there refute this allegation?

    If so, can we get some sort of counter post out on this site? The propaganda is reaching well beyond Scotland now & stuff like this needs some kind of rebuttal from our end.

    A relative is a tax accountant.

    He sent me an article from Accounting Web stating, fairly factually, that HMRC were to appeal the First Tier verdict.

    More concerning was a comment at the end by a member going by the name of 'Culzane', part of which says:

    • 'as an aside, various witnesses form Rangers admitted that they did not give the SFA the 'side letters' given to the players which gave the players gurantees about getting their money and rangers would be liable for any tax due. tehy even admitted during this case that this was to circumvent the SFA registration process and effectively meant that these players were illegally registered and a tribunal was held last week headed by Lord Nimmo Smith to review these registrations and decide if Rangers would be stripped of titles for financial doping. ie the Lance Armstrong of Scottish Football.
    • there is wider relevance here as it also meant Rangers could have had players playing illegally in european competitions for a number of years and also prize money and champions league money they received should not have been due to them. this then brings up the compensation aspect agaisnt football authorities.
    • The current President of the SFA. (Scottish Football Association) was involved at Rangers in the registration of players to the SFA during the early years of this process and also received an EBT. His organisation will be in charge of the penalties to be given to Rangers which seems to be a very big conflict of interest.'

    Looks like one of the obsessed has posted this as all the buzzwords are in there, but it raises this question:

    If witnesses FOR Rangers admitted trying to circumvent the SFA registration process, then the kangaroo court of last week would be cut & dried in their favour already, wouldn't it?

    I don't believe what this guy claims happened for a minute, but have not read transcripts of the case, so can anybody out there refute this allegation?

    If so, can we get some sort of counter post out on this site? The propaganda is reaching well beyond Scotland now & stuff like this needs some kind of rebuttal from our end.

    Cany think why u posted this guff, rangers did not administer the ebt, MIH did

×
×
  • Create New...