Jump to content

Papac 5 x

First Team
  • Posts

    164
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Papac 5 x

  1. That fat steward was getting swung about like a strippers bra when he went into get one of the union bears out ! I wonder exactly how much ' supporting your team ' you are allowed before you get lifted. Supporting your team is not a crime !!

  2. Exactly.

    I'm sick of certain individuals walking straight back into our team. (Edu) No doubt Mcculloch will waltz back in shortly.

    This.

    Hutton should start before edu and jig every time. I think ness has a edge on Hutton but with ness out last night Hutton should have played

  3. I often wonder what it would take for Hutton to get a start in our midfield! Also why only make 1sub these youngsters that were on the bench tonight, how will we ever know if they will be good enough if we don't give them a chance .

  4. I disregarded your post since I feel that if you do not know the difference between "there", "their" and "they're", your views on more subtle matters may well be equally flawed.

    P.S. Thank you to Admin for correcting that embarrassing error.

    Couldn't care less what you think. So you can jog on off this thread and leave the discussion to fans who are more interested in our club than correcting grammar !

  5. doh

    You seem to imply that it takes some special effort of focus or concentration on my behalf.

    It doesn't. It just stands out as an obvious and embarrassing error- one which should have been apparent to you as you typed it.

    Sadly, it clearly wasn't.

    Embarrassing? The only thing I'm embarrassed about is the fact that on a thread I started the only thing you wanted to do was highlight my grammar error ! The error was corrected, you could have passed comment on my post!

    When I read threads and comments on this forum I don't disregard the point to highlight a grammar error. Get a life.

  6. doh

    Where?

    FFS! Can we ban people who don't know the difference between "there", "their" and "they're"? I mean, they must be tims, given the lack of comprehension in relation to the basics of the English language. It really is KDS stuff.

    So you read my post and your main concern is my grammar mistake? It's obvious what I ment. I'm not bothered if my grammar is perfect in every post and I don't waste my time going around the forum correcting people when the point they are making is obvious!

  7. I think the general idea people have with the way rangers use youth will change this season, we will see more youth getting used as before, i am happy with this hence why i aint going Ott in gthe transfer activity threads when we lose out on someone, we need players but lets use the youths as most want that, i also think there is a fair few who dont rate the youth so much which is a shame

    Totally agree mate. I don't see the point in paying over the odds or taking a chance on a player when there is a young player that will cost nothing to try. Thought our young players were good against Chelsea on Saturday really like the look of Bendikson .

×
×
  • Create New...