Jump to content

damien1

New Signing
  • Posts

    928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by damien1

  1. I think the link is lost a little bit in the OP re his appointment.

    The Commmittee set up to appoint someone was headed by C*ltics Eric Rilley...fact

    The Committee chose Nolan Parners as the recruitment agency....fact

    Nolan Partners already were the recruitment agency for C*ltic....fact

    Nolan Parners MD is Paul Nolan,Best friends of the Ce*ltic Chairman at the time Dr Reids son Kevin...fact

    Regan recieved a call asking himn to apply for the job....fact

    Regan and Lawwell already had a business relationship....fact

    Paul Nolan friend of Dr Reids son and a C*ltic fan managed the interviews....fact

    Paul Nolan chose Regan for the role....Fact

    Paul Nolan advised the SFA committee led by C*ltics Eric Rilley on his decision...fact

    The committe led by C*ltics Eric Rilley accepted the decision....fact

    Eric Rilley is an executive director at C*ltic and recieves £250k a year...fact

    Eric Rilley recieves no salary from the SFA....FACT

    Eric Rilley knows who pays his wages....fact

    and there you go!

    Thanks ;)

    As for the religion bit, this is my personal view and if people wish to share this omitting that then they are free to do so. If it's deemed unsuitable for RM too I have no objection to it being removed from the OP.

    I think Regan is working to an agenda, I also think he's a bigot. I won't be swayed on that.

  2. Can I ask the OP to delete out the lines:

    Well we know he used to work for Nolan Partners.

    So why would Paul Nolan ask one of his own employees to apply for this position?

    As I was questioned on this and can't find the link where I found it. However it'll be re-insered if/when I do find it.

    Thanks ;)

  3. Personally I think anyone buys a paper in this country is a half-wit anyway.

    I doubt a Daily Record buying housewife in Auchtershoogle cares about a can getting thrown by some mhank in Govan. It's a non story.

    Personally I think you are a halfwit.

  4. Green is a figurehead here, any decisions will be voted on by the rest of the consortium.

    Until we know who the consortium consists of it's absolutely pointless digging up dirt on Green.

    If rumours are to be believed there are at least two billionaires in the consortium. Shall we dig dirt up on them?

  5. Here's the deal:

    Every single aspect of Rangers has been reported in the past three months.

    Be it parking tickets for players, reserve team players singing songs or anything else.

    The very fact an Ibrox employee, a female no less, gets assaulted outside Ibrox doesn't make the news is concerting to say the least.

    Even the relatively late report from the STV refuses to acknowledge the fact that the 'group' were in fact Celtic supporters.

    Anyone who doesn't think there is a meda agenda against us really does need to wake up.

  6. Damien1 73% of businesses or football clubs?

    I need a better source than Leggo before I start to relax about this situation.

    Businesses, but as has been alluded to above we will be seen as a business as the football creditors rule doesn't apply to us.

  7. The big problem for HMRC is setting a precedent. If Rangers get away with it then so can the other clubs. Also historically speaking they don't do CVAs.

    This is a big worry that people are ignoring tbh.

    Bollocks, historically HMRC agree 73% of CVAs.

  8. So...

    European football chaps

    Where we at ?

    I think we have to appeal to the SFA to reverse their decision on that.

    Which they won't.

    The only positive they could gain out of it would be Rangers maybe increasing the co-efficient slightly.

    That doesn't outweigh the punishment they deem necessary for us, bad publicity, the embarrassment and uproar of stepping backwards and the upset of other SFA clubs who are now preparing for their European campaigns.

  9. For real?

    Sorry 22 days, I forgot about the CVA prep stage. But 17 days from it being lodged in court.

    However I suspect that going by the information going around about Rangers accounts it'd take longer than that.

    I think Kennedy mentioned 8 weeks, it'd also depend on how much the new owners wanted to invest time, money and effort on it.

  10. I mean buying us today means that.

    not buying us in general.

    a cva will not be done today that much I guarantee.

    A CVA can't just be done, there is a process for it. We need to be out of administration first and foremost before the season ends. This can be done by the sale of the club irrespective of whether the CVA is agreed or not. New owners would need to fund the running costs of the club whilst the CVA arrangement is put in place.

    Correct a CVA won't be done today, or tomorrow or next week in fact, but if the main players get to an agreement fast then the process can be speeded up.

  11. they can do due dilligence while persuing a cva. but that's risky for them and us.

    if they are just outright buying us today I still say it has to be a newco.

    though perhaps they can buy the shares and peruse a cva.

    I believe a deal has been struck with HMRC and a CVA will be the route.

    I don't understand your thinking that because they are buying us outright automatically means a newco, on nwhat basis?

  12. Deal better not involve letting Shyte offf

    I'd imagine any deal with Whyte will have to otherwise it's a no-goer.

    He is still the major player here and we need those shares to get rid of him.

    If it involves some sort of appeasement I'm all for it to get our club back on track.

  13. I am concerned with the long term outlook with TBK's in charge. We know nothing of how they will fund Rangers as an ongoing business. Or to that matter what plans they really have.

    Miller on the otherhand is a proven business man and has actually laid out a plan for all to see.

×
×
  • Create New...