Jump to content

Mitchy1094

New Signing
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mitchy1094

  1. I never at any point said it was 'someone out to get us', I was just trying to highlight the double standards involved. how the bet is placed isn't really the point though, is it?

    It doesn't really. However, it does point to a massive shift in the market and betting being far more readily (and somewhat anonymously) available to players. You're highlighting double standards in an area where the entire market has shifted in 20 years. Using a 20 year old example to satisfy an agenda that doesn't really fit is what I personally view as absurd.

  2. Black deserves to get pulled up sharply if he has been backing games he was involved in. But if they're going to go back seven years on this case, is that the cut off? Where do they stop? The whole thing is completely stupid, and as has been said, is opening up a can of worms that the SFA can't possibly hope to implement evenly.

    I totally agree with that and let's be honest...a lot of the players have a punt regularly. I just hate the whole "Something has happened to Rangers, therefore it's automatically someone out to get us". Bringing up a story from a time where there wasn't internet and online gambling is absurd.

  3. He Started the game well but has become a bit comical in the last 20 minutes. Can barely trap the ball

    Has played well today though so credit where its due,if it weren't for a fantastic save he'd have scored the opener (tu)

    There's been 10 minute spells in a couple of games where he's looked alright, I just think he's looked absolutely terrible for us this season. I mean...2 goals?

×
×
  • Create New...