Jump to content

RFCJoshy1690

First Team
  • Posts

    153
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RFCJoshy1690

  1. 6 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

    I'm well into a slab of Beer and a bottle of Russian Standard so I'm feeling optimistic and going for Garner and Dodoo up top alongside each other and running riot with the sheepy defence. 

    Of course I'm sure my head will be banging in the morning and hopes shattered. ????

    I'm the same mate I'm away tae ma bed, dream blue ❤️?

  2. 12 minutes ago, BILLYBOY50 said:

    can someone explain to me why we can't change from a 433 and still retain possesion of the ball but move the ball quicker press higher and for fuck sake have some shots on goal.i can't wait to see the players reacting to that inexcusable defeat midweek and at least if they put in a similar performance with the same outcome after all their post match talk then we will know what they are made of cmon rangers prove us all wrong.

    There isn't a reason (well not that I can explain), watching us a play a 433 I actually dont can't see the strengths that's it's meant to deliver it just seems like a complete dud of a formation 

  3. 1 minute ago, 1NachoNovo said:

    He gets carved up like a kipper week in week out. But to be fair, we'll learn from it. As long as we keep training well and using the squad, then we'll be fine. The one problem I have with that is, fuck using the squad. If they aren't earning a starting place, then that's their problem. It's a managers job to play the best team at all times, not poor wee whoever beause it's his turn. If they ain't good enough, then they can do one.

    If we work on the geography and get the loading right we'll be in a good place 

  4. 2 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

    The player's we do have with some pace like McKay and O'Halloran have little end product though.

    We've not got any great options upfront, let's face it.

    Just think them 3 for this game anyway is the best combo but it doesn't really matter who we pick really.

     

    Ah well u see I said this on another thread about McKay. I don't think he's a winger for me he's a no.10 he can drive and create with through and long balls that is a strength he has 

  5. 2 minutes ago, pcbear said:

    I honestly think our players are incapable of playing well two games in a row, as fans it drives us mad Garner/Dodoo/Forrester/MOH play well one game after being benched, they get a start and look as if they have never seen a ball before (not just these four) consistency is non existent.

    Can't really expect anything else when they can't get a run of games so patchy form is understandable 

  6. 1 minute ago, To Be A Ranger said:

    No matter who it is they are on a hiding to nothing. The service and support they will get is not going to be good enough judging by our season so far. Same formation and tactics will see the same old feelings of deja vu. I can see us winning but it will be the usual struggle.

    You never know we could play a blinder tomorrow

     

     *no laughing at the back*

  7. 1 minute ago, VladimirWeiss69 said:

    For me it should be Dodoo Garner MOH. Dodoo and MOH purely to hit them on the counter but tbh I would much rather change the formation which you just know will never happen

    We all do, it's alright talking about formations etc on here in theory but we need to deal with what we have at the moment and that's the pishy 433

  8. 1 minute ago, cushynumber said:

    And they came to him, worshiping him and saying, "Surely you are the Son of God."


    And Jesus answered "aye but am no' Gazza"

    He'll add a bit of steel in the midfield, can take some serious punishment

  9. 1 minute ago, DP FC said:

    Godson is not the standard we should be looking for.

    in his last game, he had a game worse than any Tav has had, and Tav has been pish all season.

    I don't think that's entirely true mate

  10. 3 minutes ago, Bears said:

    celtc game rings a bell?

    If we had 2 of them against whathisname the other night then perhaps one of them could have prevented him having a tap in or two!

    I cannae see that happening again if I'm honest I think that was a one off, could be wrong though 

  11. 2 minutes ago, Bears said:

    With hindsight, Tav in midfield, driving on like Windass would have been better than Crooks the other night, surely. Maybe play Hodson and Tav tomorrow then?

    I think the only way we'll see that is if we're sleeping 

  12. 5 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

    Don't think I've given you abuse before. I maybe have and if I have I do understand why. You were initially irrelevant then became a cocksocket. 

    But like  a broken clock you can still be right. And like a clock it is only about twice a day.

    Doesn't mean you're not a twat. Cos you are, baby steps joshy washy.

    :hanged:

×
×
  • Create New...