Jump to content

there'sonlyoneamoruso

Senior Member
  • Posts

    6,455
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by there'sonlyoneamoruso

  1. 13 hours ago, Lloyd72 said:

    Grant is hurting

    What Grant fails to understand is the TV pictures are what got him off. If only the ref had access to multiple angles of the incident then he would have been able to make the correct decision at the time.

    Video technology is an absolute must.

  2. 33 minutes ago, bigsasasfloopyhair said:

    One day a referee is going to get legal action raised against them for impartially, bias, loss of earnings etc.

    Imagine for example a horrif red card, rescinded, but team misses out on a champions league place, promotion etc as a result of said decision.

    Itll happen one day. 

    Cheating cunts.

    Would it be against the referee or the governing association? Would the club start legal action or could the individual the was wronged? It would open a huge can of worms and Timothy would be forever running to the solicitor.

  3. 1 minute ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

    I now await action taken on those who evidence shows wrongly escaped punishment and an apology ftom the Head of Refereeing.......

    Don't hold your breath while you wait for that.

  4. 2 minutes ago, ianferguson said:

    I'd like to make an appeal to the compliance officer to visit Specsavers if he thinks Stokes played to the rules on Saturday. 

    How has Stokes not been hauled in front of the beaks to explain his behaviour on Saturday? It beggars belief!

  5. 7 minutes ago, cushynumber said:

    its the most you can punish someone on a football field and they are getting it wrong 60% of the time. Maybe they should learn to keep their cards in their pocket, and just ref the game without trying to be the centre of attention, they would get on better

    You'd almost think that they are out of their depth and need some sort of TV Match Official to help them out.

  6. 53 minutes ago, HG5 said:

    Maybe a wee injury, perhaps?

    Possibly helps Pedro (in an odd way) by limiting his choices to his main men, instead of juggling giving everybody game time at the expense of his first picks.

    Still too early in the season for anyone to claim 'tiredness' & needing to rotate.

    He hasn't been mentioned in terms of injury in the press conferences. So that suggests to me that Pedro has either lost confidence in him or has identified a weakness in his play that he is trying to correct before deploying him again (ie he's maybe not up to the rough and tumble of Scottish football).

    I'd like the press to ask these kinds of questions rather than "Have you ever met Neil Lennon?"

  7. 9 hours ago, K.A.I said:

    A good way to do it is gradually introduce him into a winning team with a feel good factor ... 20 minutes last night for example and get the confidence up 

     

    8 hours ago, HG5 said:

    TBH he could have had the last 20 last night, cos Windass wasn't going to score in a barrel of fannies. Like you say, there was a bit of feel-good going on (how often have we been able to say that recently?).

    It is definitely odd that he has dropped out of the squad all together. Wednesday would have been perfect to reintroduce him and give him a few minutes.

    I'm not convinced by Dalcio BTW, so him falling out of favour doesn't bother me at all.

  8. Is it a coincidence that since Dalcio has dropped out of the team (and squad) that we have started to play better and come into a bit of form?

    We were poor in Luxembourg that is something we all agree on, but Dalcio was by far the worst that game and he wasn't on that long. He gave the ball away almost every time.

    He'll not make many appearances for us and will probably have his loan deal terminates by Christmas.

×
×
  • Create New...