Jump to content

TheFarmer

New Signing
  • Posts

    2,104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by TheFarmer

  1. not the worst, we paid off all footbaloing debts, the initial investor group paid the wages of the players before liquidation, the 5.5million paid for the club might well be paid off for all we know, edminston house and albion car park bought outright, big payoffs to boca and goian, and for all we know stadium upgrades and other expenses were paid off

    until the accounts come out we know heehaw

    Wait, so you're saying Green and Co didn't actually put in the £5.5m to buy the club?

    Genuine question?

  2. I've read all the interviews, and I've read all the speculation ~ the fact remains we do not know, nor will we until the figures are published.

    Then, and only then can we say whether its being run right or not, is that not logical?

    I'm guessing your one of the ones that trusted Whyte well into administration due to there being no audited accounts?

  3. Yup, speculation just as I thought. I think I'll wait to see the accounts before I make up my mind, feel free to do what you please of course. (tu)

    No it is a fact that the £22m IPO money and all of last seasons ST money (£10m) has been spent.

    The definition of 'pissing away money' for a club in the fourth/third tier of Scottish football.

  4. And where does McColl fit into that mate - he's promoting himself as the spokesman/leader. So, would blin & pm be his runners. Not as easy as it seems it is mate.

    You said you wished Walter would come out in a definite direction. He has.

    He is for all the changes proposed by the McColl camp, except the possible retention of Mather.

  5. Who do you support - both sides are an unknown........ Like being involved in an election, but no knowledge of the candidates strategies. Wished to f*** either Walter would come out with a definite direction or a fan buyout similar to b.dortmund.

    Walter supports the removal of the board and the appointment of Biln and P. Murray.

    Although he wants a compromise to allow Mather to stay.

  6. Completely agree. More fans would buy into the scheme if they knew it meant we had the majority control. Control to elect a fit and proper board, and to remove anyone should this sort of carry on we are witnessing was to ever happen again. The knowledge that we would, every year, be injecting a huge sum of cash into the club(which i believe should be used for youth development/scouting).

    Hamburg have a membership of 70,000, now if this scheme was opened up to all bears around the globe, who's to say we could not match that?

    I set out a basic business model and ideas for how it could work on another thread and potential incomes that could be generated, but even if our membership subscription was set at £15 a month(£180 per year, and i dont find that too large), at 70,000 members thats just over £12.5m! And that would be yearly.

    As I said above as soon as you start talking about making money it becomes unviable.

    None of the german teams make a profit out of their membership schemes.

    The members control the club and pay around 50-60 euros a year for the privilage (say £45 on average at todays exchange rates) They also get decent doscounts at the club shop, along with a free matchday programme at every home game and discounted match tickets.

  7. Been looking at some membership schemes and what they would bring. Burnley was the first one I've properly checked out and it's £4.49 per month. Reckoning with 50,000 fans signing up it would generate over £2.5m per year. An excellent way of generating cash but would we get 50,000 signing up? It all depends on what's being offered I suppose.

    No chance we would get 50,000 signing up if all you got was:

    Priority home match tickets

    £5 off home match tickets

    Membership card

    Half price tour

    Select discounts at megastore

    To get big numbers of members the membership scheme needs full control of the club. I.e. 50%+ of the shares.

    Where membership schemes are sucessful in european football, they are not there to make money. As soon as you start talking about making money it isnt going to be a sucess.

  8. What paper has reported the most accurately on our club?

    During all the hysteria last year I think every newspaper used the term new club without actually establishing the facts, most have since been put in their place by various SFA, SPL, SFL, SPFL, UEFA, ECA, ASA rulings that have confirmed the fact that the club only changed hands.

    It seems more like individuals like Spiers and Roddy Forsyth, among others, that spout this nonsense these days. Vast minority, though it does make it easy to identify the Rangers haters.

×
×
  • Create New...