Aldo1872

We've seen it time and again for weeks now.
I've watched Graham represent our interests brilliantly on TV - doing a grand job in standing up for our club. I've never met the man, but if I ever do I want to stand him a pint for making a complete fool out of Britney. That alone should cut him a lot of slack from our supporters.
But, having now said all of that, I'm also of the opinion that the main driver of attacks on Graham from fellow Rangers supporters is envy. It's embarrassing to watch some of the playground grade idiocy thrown at him by our own.
One went as far as to claim that Graham being appointed to a position within Rangers would 'light the blue touch paper' on inter-fan violence.

I've never seen anyone (from Edgar, to Macmillan, to Kerr and more) say they're speaking for everyone. That would be ludicrous and untrue.
All these people are doing is, when asked, giving their opinion - usually on behalf of those they represent - to give a flavour of what the Rangers support is thinking. It may be reflective of the majority, it may not; but if anyone has serious opposition to these people and/or organisations, it's more constructive to offer an alternative.

It seems that anyone brave enough to put their head above the parapet is there to be shot down, primarily by our own supporters. People seem to jump to the conclusion that Chris and others believe they are speaking for the Rangers support, when in fact I don't believe that to be true. Chris gives his opinions on the likes of STV and if others assume that he is speaking for our fans then that is their fault.
If we put half as much energy into working together as we do squabbling with eachother then perhaps things would be very different. Sadly though such unity seems unlikely any time soon.