Jump to content

With Heart and Hand

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by With Heart and Hand

  1. 58 minutes ago, govanblue said:

    In line with similar organisations, they have a broad charter which requires their funds be donated across a variety of categories.  

    Thus you will see we have International Partners, National Partners, Local Partners and Community Partners.  All sectors need to get a share.  That's how the Foundations work, and it's a requirement for their status.

    Don't start thinking you can win a debate with me using facts Mr Blue!

  2. 1 minute ago, He's blue he's white said:

    I don't see why we need to get our knickers in a knot if we do?? 

    I don't see what the point of it is.

    Why not just put some ads in the stadium or on the tops?

    If this was something organised by fans or a fans group then I'd be fine with a display but it's something that's being pushed by the Club not the fans. For lack of a better term it's being "forced" on us.

    I have no issue with unicef but if some fans do they shouldn't feel the need to partake in a display. 

    Personally I'd rather the money from a Rangers charity go to issues at home rather than to refugees but that's not my main reason for not wanting the display

  3. 13 hours ago, K.A.I said:

    SKY can't compete with BT? ... I could be wrong but I'd have thought it was the other way around.

    Any games BT take is the ones SKY don't want. Make no mistake. 

    BT would be doing SKY a favour taking the Scottish games. Why does Scotland think we're owed something from SKY? this wee Highlander mentality is mental. It's a pish product. If you feel strongly about it cancel your SKY subscription or something.

    It's ridiculous and It's an attitude that's promoted by those in charge of Scottish the football and by the media

    You just have to look at that Scotlands Game programme on BBC that basically asked the question "what caused the drop in standards in Scottish football?" and their answer was Sky TV and Rangers :lol:

    Those in charge of the SFA have basically buried their heads in the sand for the past 20 years and have given up. 

    Four or more OF games might be a big draw but I can't understand why they'd pay to broadcast the rest of the Scottish games just to get the OF,  I'm surprised they haven't just low balled every offer or said "we want the OF but you can keep the rest"

  4. 2 minutes ago, WadeWilson said:

    Are you Willis or cumnockbear, that is the question... Hmmm.

    PS - Rodgers is Northern Irish and has no memories of major tournaments with any country as he was shite. Used the early-retirement-through-injury as an excuse. Like his pal, 

    I'm Cumnock bear and ill punch yer cunt in

×
×
  • Create New...