Twitter is so shit. The lay out is so confusing, it's always a chore trying to figure out what has been said to prompt replies. Why can't they just show conversations in a linear format, like every other social networking site?
And what I am suggesting is that they are smart enough (not spending) and lucky enough (1 horse race to Euro football) for that not to be a problem for them. People on here constantly see Celtic selling their decent players are react with "haha Celtic need Rangers". It's bizarre.
I never read the papers, but almost all of my Non-Rangers supporting call the Daily Record the "Daily Rangers". I'm not sure if they do so because they think they're positively biased towards Rangers, or because all the talk about is Rangers.
I have entertaining football conversations with plenty of people. I just don't make threads about them haha. And hey, don't slate it eating dugs until you've tried it
Having a go at what? And this thread's not interesting. I doubt you even said the things you claimed to have said. You probably fumbled over your own words like a right wee fairy haha.
Have you ever played football? At any level? Putting a ball past a keeper defending 2 jumpers laid out on a park feels good. Putting a goal past a keep at fives feels good. So on and so forth. If I scored for Rangers, in front of 50,000, I'd go totally bananas.
Why should I question myself? The premise of this argument is simple. I don't think he's upto standards. I'm not alone with that thinking too. Nothing more, nothing less. I believe he has more faults than attributes as a player. I haven't written him off. I just don't see why suddenly he deserves a chance RIGHT NOW, on our biggest game as of yet this season. I'm befounded by your reply. Why are you offended? Because I don't hold the same opinion as you that he's "a real natural talent"?