-
Posts
1,667 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by Alwaysblue
-
-
2 minutes ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:
I could imagine that a director may have said that he liked the tune, not the words, but Spiers twists it to mean something else.
I cannot imagine a Director saying this never mind the fact I don't think any Director would speak to Spiers!
-
He's banned just now and Park taking action against the hags paper could actually start working hit these cunts in the pocket.
Has he been actually banned? haven't seen any formal announcement
-
I personally think it's yet another lazy, misleading and mischievous piece of journalism. All of our problems of the past few years were never going to just disappear overnight, and we were never going to build a SPFL/Champions League winning team in the Championship, throwing millions of pounds at players. It takes time, and a bit of patience to do things right. And that is the most important thing. Getting it right (as best we can).
We are laying and implementing essential, fundamental structures to ensure everything is in place ie staff, recruitment, scouting, youth teams, training, formation, ethos, infrastructure, historic contracts, PR etc. There have been mistakes and there will no doubt be more mistakes to come but things are progressing very nicely on and off the field given we are only about 7 months into the new regime. That said, I actually think our current squad could easily compete in the SPFL and with a few quality additions, which I believe will happen, we can win the SPFL at the first time of asking. Warburton will have done extensive homework on a higher calibre of player IMO and I think the Board will back him. The gap that some seem to see is simply not there IMO and there is no reason to fear anyone in the SPFL.
There is such a positivity around Ibrox right now that you could be forgiven for thinking that many journalists would be focusing on all the great things and changes we have made, but yet again, although there are some token compliments it is a very unnecessarily negative piece IMO.
Out of interest, what are the valid points you seen from the piece?
I couldnt agree more with this summation - the Gannon article is nothing short of appalling but pretty standard for the Record
-
Nothing inaccurate about that statement
-
It works fine in Barbados International Airport though.
I didnt have any problem there either
-
Is Bournemouth no fulla faggots or is that Brighton?
Brighton
-
No apostrophe in you've and it is an INQUIRY not enquiry!!! Thickos!!!! Must have been Tims that made the banners ???
-
Mols or Negri in Warbs team. Or Colin Stein, or Jim Forrest. Fuck, even Billy Urquhart would bang them in with the amount of chances this team creates.
Billy Urquhart - now there is a blast from the past!!
-
Absolutely not, fuck him and everything about him.
Let's not forget what he's said about our club before now.
Couldn't agree more
-
I found that quite refreshing - what a change from recent years
-
Brilliant for those of us of a certain vintage
-
Scott Allan.
He is going to Hibs!
-
Commons rant proved one thing without question Collins is a shitebag.
I think Collins is running the show!!!
-
We should get Scott Allan on loan and get him some first team football before he's sold back to a wee diddy team.
I dont think we would take him but would not be surprised to see him loaned back to Hibs to give him "game time"
-
Have we ever had a player called O'something?
Don't make this the first if we haven't. He's fast, that's all.
Alex O'Hara but was brought up a bluenose
-
It wont work out at Bolton - he is finished!!!
-
If this happens I will meet you at ibrox with a bottle of champagne and a cigar you can watch the highlights of that game feet up glass in hand and blow smoke rings at the tv
I will join you!!!
-
saw a bit of the game today - it was pish!!!
-
The manager now knows what we need.
King has to back him in the next two windows, that's crucial.
3 or 4 players for our weak areas and we will be fine.
Stangely enough I agree with you
-
I attended Cathkin often - my Dad used to take me if we were away and Thirds were at home. At the time they were managed by George Young - one of my father's idols. A guy called Bill Hiddleston then took over the club and Young resigned, citing that if Hiddleston was in charge the club would not go forward. They did go on the slippery slope. Hiddleston then brought in a guy call James Reilly, who if I recall correctly was a JP. Given his background and the bad form, crowds dwindled. Thirds were mainly backed by Rangers fans as their second team. You can see the real demise when Reilly came in. I think he was later jailed for fraud and Hiddleston then took over gain. The club never recovered. That is all from memory. I think the team around that time was:
Robertson
McGillvary
Left back to left half cant remember
Goodfellow
Hilley
Harley
Gray
McInnes
They were a good side
-
Ajax were shite last night but them defending better than usual obviously played a massive part in that, they also looked better going forward and I wouldn't trust our defence at all against them.
We do play more eye-catching football though, in a poorer league.
I think the above is accurate. I too would worry about our defence. We require a good holding midfield player before we are ready - I can wait until next season. Having said all that, I would not be overly concerned if we had to play them
-
You'd still win mate. It's just starting us off with minus goals. So if you put -2 on and we won 4-0 you would Still win. If we win 2-0 though then you'd lose the bet.
Many thanks ,,- many thanks. Starting -4 for Saturday
-
Not really a betting man. Can someone explain the minus goals thing. If I put money on at -2, I assume we start 2 goals behind. Would you still win if we won 4-0? or does it have to be 3-0? Sorry for being thick!!!
-
I too thought it his best game although not really pressurised. Was a bit doubtful at first but winning me over - might get a better idea after St Johnstone game.
Angela Haggerty sacked from Herald
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
One would suppose that that post falls foul of the law?