gary2006

what salary are the easdales taking from the club and are they getting the bonuses stockbridge and mather are on?

you are spot on,paul murray getting involved was pr suicide,they could have won this weeks ago,frank blin driving the bus and corporate governance should have been their campaign plan,blin would have walked it easily,but paul murray and the rst were a god send to irvine,they gave him a perfect chance to muddy the waters,he turned it into a takeover story when it was about institutional investors and cenkos who wanted financial transparency and board room change,now it has turned in to a pr mudslinging game were what is best for the club is the 1 thing that is not discussed.

irvine has never been good for the club or the fans,i dont expect him to start now,he will do what he does best,which is protect his client ,if rangers get fucked in the process like we did with whyte ,so be it.he will still pocket his money

every time bill writes a blog the opinion ratings for paul murray and jim mccoll go through the roof,the board got jack irvine involved just at the right time because mcmurdo was a 1 man wrecking machine for green and ahmad,if irvine didn't come back when he did paul murray would already be on the board by now,mather and stockbridge are inexperianced plonkers with no backbone who were ready to buckle,irvine saved their arse and bought them time,reading todays blog's it seems thing's are about to get really nasty and personal and if i was jack irvine i would ask mcmurdo to take a vacation till this is over because he is worse than a man down.bill provides reverse propaganda by mistake lol.

jack is doing a great job,changed the game,if jack irvine never appeared ,this board would have buckled weeks ago and paul murray would have been on the board by now,i have got to say i'm very dissapointed in irvine,he would have been a fantastic guy to represent the fans and the club,but he sold us out,he represented whyte and used his skills to buy whyte time and that allowed whyte the time to sink us,irvine is supposedly a rangers man but he represented whyte till the end and look what happened .i wonder if jack will do the same again,will he represent his clients even if it means the club get fucked over again,time will tell.

go and take a fuck to yourself,you are nothing but a troll

big man insulting people on a computer screen,what did i read wrong?did he get his shares for the same price as green or what the institutional investors paid?

what a total stich up,this highlights that something is badly wrong,greens crew can buy at 1p,but they are looking for others to pay 14 million for 28 percent, easdale is going to make more than a million for shares that he paid pennys for,this stinks .

they said it ,secured first refusal on greens shares,has charles sold?has it been announced on the stock exchange?one thing we know about charles green is that he came here for the money,he wants top dollar for his shares,do you think the easdales will pay top dollar for his shares?the first refusal on greens shares was a brilliant pr move to make the easdales look credible,it worked a treat and it bought green and ahmad time.

you have to laugh at the daily record,they are that dumb that they cant factualy report the connections with the easdales and green and accurately report what is going on,irvine has played well again,an apology and also got them to print that green isnt involved in the company,another dreadful performance from the record,they really are bottom of the league for upto date accurate information.the record should have said we were wrong,the easdales got on the board for free to carry out charles and imrans plans to the letter.

agreed,its pure pish,its time we went back to the old pre match music before the game,the gutless pc crap they are playing before the game is dreadful.

you make a good case for trying out the 3 5 2 ,but i'm a massive fan of the 4 2 31 or the 4 3 3 i just love the flexability of these formations and the attacking options you get with these formations,watching some of the football arsenal bayern and barca and even the spanish and german national teams have played in the last couple of years has been the best standards of exciting attacking football i have ever seen,i would love us to try and copy the formation of these teams even though you are write in saying the gulf in quality between us and them is ginormous.

you make some good points,walter smith was succesful domesticaly with the 3 5 2,but the brand of football wasn't great,the dutch national team have tried 3 at the back as well,they tried a 3 4 3 and also barca had a try at 3 at the back also under van gaal,but every team has ditched it because they would rather use that extra player in the middle of the park or out wide, bayern barca and arsenal have perfected the perfect formation,i would just copy them,their formation is excellent for keeping possession within the system all the players seem to have passing options when they are on the ball and they have plenty of options in that formation going forward,3 5 2 is a bit like saturdays 4 4 2 certain players in certain positions become isolated and it affects the quality and speed of the passing.i also think playing 3 5 2 can be a defensive formation because playing that extra centre half cuts down your options in other areas of the field.

the problem with 3 5 2 is 3 centre halfs is overkill 1 player out wide tends to get over run a good team playing 4 33 tends to swamp a 3 5 2 walter liked to play a 3 5 2 back in the 9 in a row days,it's a poor formation for playing good football,certain players in the formation tend to get isolated and the wing backs are overworked and get targeted for 2 v 1 s

agree about paul murray gogzy,he has made it easy for the other side to change the debate,its the paul murray show ,when it should be about corporate governance and what is best for the club going forward,going forward i hope murray the easdales,mather and stockbridge are all gone.i think the easdales are getting off easy,its time some questions were answered,paul murray is asked what his plans are the easdales should be asked the same,my opinion is the easdales were never buying greens shares,the first refusal thing was just to give them a bit of credibility.they are just working for green,mcmurdo and irvine have given the easdales some good pr just as they did with whyte ie the 100 million pound stuff,i like a bet gogzy and i would bet a few quid that the easdales dont buy greens shares and come 2014 the easdales will be lucky to own 3 percent.

so are you changing your tune again,in your opinion is green still having a major say in the day to day running of the club?

do you honestly believe that,green the easdales and jack irvine are running the show.

until its announced on the stock exchange ,green is still our biggest shareholder

trying to muddy the waters again,the first right of refusal with green and the easdales was a pr stunt to make them look credible,and it was also done to buy green time,its worked up until now,but the clock is ticking.the whole easdale thing is crumbling,its becoming obvious that they were never nothing more than a smokescreen to buy green and ahmad time.

murray is a red herring who has done nothing but muddy the waters,paul murray being involved has been a dream for green and jack irvine,because we cant have a debate about what is going on at the club,its turned into the paul murray show,bad or good paul murray is not required,getting him involved was pr suicide,frank blin should have been driving the bus not paul murray,it should have been frank blin and corporate governance that were the key words,not paul murray.

again you are trying to muddy the waters,green told the bbc he had an agreement to sell to sandy easdale and that he was finished with rangers,the easdales made a statement on bbc saying they were buying all of greens shares,but no announcement to the stock exchange,now both easdales are on the board,nobody knows how much shares they own,and you are telling us green still owns his shares,so sifting through all the bull shit ,green still owns his shares and the easdales are working to the same plan as green,am i right,and also the easdales will never buy greens shares because they cant afford the price green would want,so i will say it again,its a stich up,they are only getting away with it because the press are to dumb to out them.

pure rubbish,your attempt at reverse psychology failed,greens a money man,charles is expecting the best price for his shares,you telling me the easdales are offering the best price,not a chance,its a stich up

i tend to see through propaganda,with all due respect,your lower leagues for propaganda,i saw through you on day 1

if the other side want to oust this board at the agm,they should go after the easdales just the same way irvine and mcmurdo went after paul murray,the easdales are sitting ducks.but the question is will the press and the bloggers have the balls bury them,if the other side want to win the pr battle then they should counter attack using irvines tacticts against the easdales.

i disagree,people think the easdales have bought a massive stake in the club and its not true,if everybody new the easdales were nothing more than green and ahmads henchman,doing the everyday dirtywork for their boss .peoples opinion of them would change,in my opinion the easdales will never own greens shares because they couldnt afford to pay the kind of cash he is looking for,i think the easdales are just like stockbridge,somebody elses employe who are just in it for a big wage.