jimg1873

I agree that it looks like a load of pish. It falls down in at the start as why would all these director's, CEO's etc would know the fine details of the prospectus and the references to Sevco confirms it. Wikipedia must have been in meltdown to come up with the floation jargon and knowing fine well that no one will speak out to deny. These fuckers never give up with their obsession. Think they should be more concerned with their own finances as if they don't get CL football next season the piggery will be lucky to half full at any point.

Edited.

Surely Wallace but won't be before we are in Division1 / SPL2.

If we were to lose the tax case the question we would need answered is how big a bill would we be able to continue to trade with. For example if the principle amount was circa £25m and penalties were not imposed would we avoid administration? i.e. by doing a sale and lease back on the stadium. As a season ticket holder i would rather pay an additional premium of say £100 per season on top of season ticket price for say 5 seasons (in exchange for shares) and still be able to watch a team worthy of wearing a Rangers jersey.

put forward a semi credible agruement.

Suppose the issue that we have is that any mhank can put forward a theory that CW or anyone at Rangers isn't going to waste their time in discrediting. Unfortunately the creator of the site isn't as inbred as the others and can actually

What is the deal with the Rangers Tax Case website and their supposed inside info? I'm guessing that it is a tim that has set it up?