Quiet Jim
-
Posts
979 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by Quiet Jim
-
-
Dunfermline, Amoruso playing left wing, with a peach of a cross, GOAAAAAAAAl.
-
FTP.
File Transfer Protocol?
It's all in context.
Can I borrow 50p, so that I can buy a flute?
-
Is it due to passion, money or other motives?
All of the above!
There is money to be made!
There is passion to be expressed!
There are scores needing settling!
I do not believe in conspiracies or in persecution; however our vengeance against the bigots will result in annihilation.
A wounded Bear is one to be feared.
A healthy Bear, with an army of investors, that support the cause, will crush all.
Any supporter, player or investor who at this time, nails his/her colours to the mast are legends!
So brace yourselves, for we ARE coming to get you!
I applaud us all!
-
I am liking this man more and more everyday.
Pure Class!
-
Maybe there isnt another league. Dont agree with women and football anyway.
Aye women are shit athletes. just look at the GB medal results. should make them stay in the house and only venture out door wearing pyjamas and a Balaclava.
Sports are only for men, right?
A bears a bear and at least they compete competivly, for the rangers. Something that we have dreamt about for years but will never fulfil.
Good luck to them.
-
I think it would be a bit hypocritical of us to talk about other teams "stealing players", especially after recent events.
?????????????????????????????????????????????
We got shafted, left, right and centre.
Your point, I fail to understand.
To the SFA my response is;
We are coming to get you, you dirty fenian mother fuckers.
Simples!
Definition of a Fenian is a founder of the IRA as per the Oxford Dictionary.
Whooops, clicked the wrong button.
-
-
Outrageous that this song cannot be played, whilst the scum actively support terrorism.
-
Cultural Videos
We know our history and our friends!
-
Sounds to me like the Tax Case might be about to drop, Murray is coming out fighting, arse of a man who should never be forgiven.
Time to batten down the hatches, I've a feeling this is all about to get very real indeed.
If we lose this case MIH is royally fucked, it was second nature to them.
DM might be pleading the fifth, or is playing dumb.
If fenian.co.uk deliver a verdict before the judgment and are proven incompetent / bigoted, there will be ‘social unrest’.
However, EBT by definition is not a dual contract.
-
No surrender then no surrender now
Hold fast, stand firm and justice will be served.
Vengeance can wait; we have more urgent matters to be rectified.
What have you done to get a -8?
-
You keep on saying this, along with what Murray stated today/yesterday.
However, the few players that have came forward to mention their EBTs have never considered it as a loan. In fact, you could argue that they were insinuating that the payments were contractual.
I am talking about Dodds, Boumsong and Wattereus here.
Final non contractual payment, made via a loan.
No registration, no contract, loan(EBT) is irrelevant.
Show me the contract/loan/deeds.
-
Standing our ground.
I recommend that all of our supporters research the definition of contractual agreements, before capitulating to the blood fest demanded by the rest of our backwater country.
I was once a proud Scot, but my pride in my country is no more.
The vindictiveness, shown by the majority of my countrymen, has been exposed.
We have been battered, punished and disciplined to the max, but our ‘countrymen’ demand more.
However, at this moment, only three words are important to me;
Contractual, Loan & Discretionary.
A contract is a contract,
A loan is a loan,
Discretionary is discretionary.
Regans agenda will be defeated in a court of Law.
Hold fast, stand firm and justice will be served.
Vengeance can wait; we have more urgent matters to be rectified.
-
Not sure I get this it was a loan but it's never to be paid back?
It was a loan, but there was no debt collectors to enforce the loan when / if it was payable.
Totally legal.
I will give you £100, pay me back sometime, whenever it suits you.
Player, skint at the moment, pay you back later.
Try and enforce this loan in a British court of law.
Show me the dual contract that stipulates player x gets y amount per year with a loan of z amount, that is discretionary!
FeniansTakeItUpTheBum law firm insist they have a prima faciae case against Rangers.
Unfortunately the dirty smelly, thieving, tinky, peados bastards still think they are in the republic.
In a BRITISH court of law, we will rip them a new arsehole and send them home
-
If I was green I'd hire private investigators to dig for as much dirt on the other clubs and the men at the top of the other clubs as possible because I'm sure there is plenty
Plain and simple, if we go down, the full Murray Empire goes down.
MIH implemented the same scheme with the same lawyers.
It was a loan!
If incorrectly implemented, thousands of jobs will go.
The Rangers Football Club followed legal advice and EBT’s were never contractual.
MIH defended the case between HMRC V The Rangers Football Club.
However, we never shagged weans, milord.
Justice is all we seek, but vengeance we will demand!
-
Good man,time for more to speak up as well
Every penny we have will go into the RFFF, this is our history and no tinks from the east end will thieve it from us.
They have their tainted title(s), but they will never steal ours, we welcome your investigation, but we will destroy you in a court of law!
GSTQ & the British Courts!
Social unrest, is that a challenge, Mr Regan McFuckwit?
-
Our problem with the SPL isn't that we used EBTs, it's because they think we had players on dual contracts. We maintain that the EBTs were loans from a benefit trust and did not form part of their contract.
Although RFC paid money into the trust fund, as far as I can understand, it wasn't RFC who paid out the loans to the players. The loans were paid out by The Rangers Employee Benefit Trust (REBT) which I believe will not be run by RFC but by independent trustees. In effect, such payments were from a different source. For confirmation that the REBT has no fiscal attachment to RFC, that trust's financial dealings are not mentioned anywhere in RFC accounts. If it was part of the RFC group it should be included. The only mention in the ten years the EBT scheme was in operation is that RFC paid money into the scheme.
What else should be considered is that our annual accounts were provided to both the SFA and SPL. They should have questioned this at the outset if they thought there was a problem. That they didn't do so is negligence on their part.
Show me the Contracts!
Show me the Loans!
If all else fails, for fuck sake, at least show me the deeds!
-
Wishing I'd said now I was a bloke lol. I'll get the profile pic sorted tomorrow. Pic of me n Ally at tomorrow nights game (aye right)!!
Shit, I just shared the image you PM'd me.
Sorry
-
arsenal football cluub ran ebt's for years.i believe they stopped in 2004 and settled with hmrc at the time.
there was never any question of the gunners being in the slightest bit of trouble with the f.a. for running the schemes.
our tax scheme scenario has been blown out of all proportion by pacific shellic aided and abetted by the mhedia
It was a LOAN!
The future is bright, the futures orange, I tell you!
-
I cant give that away I'm under cover lol
100+ posts by sunrise?
Buy at a book store near you.
-
i'll be the first to do it her
Wrong, in so many levels.
-
Hubbie is on this site all the time so rather than him telling me everything that's going on I thought I'd come on and see for myself
Welcome.
-
Murray shouldn't have let this carry on for as long as it did, but it's good that he seems to be putting a lot of the speculation to rest.
We’re coming to get you,
We’re coming to get you,
Cause we can!
-
Murray is just summarising the clubs argument v HMRC. The crux must be how the players applied for the loans from the 3rd party trust and what the repayment terms were. I would thank that HMRC need to show that the loans were, on the balance of probabilty, never intended to be repayed and therefore tax evation. Do they have evidence of this? Have any payments been made back to the trust by the loanees or not? We don't know, we haven't seen the paperwork. However, the decision is (strangely) taking too long to be made public. I think the court is trying it's best to find in HMRC's favour but finding it difficult to put forward a justifiable 'ratio decidendi' . If we are found liable they know that if the decision is based on weak evidence then we will appeal. The devil is in the detail of the loan repayment arrangements, whether they were reasonable in the circumstances and whether they were adhered or not. TBH, I think we will eventually win the case.
Spot on.
EBT – legal until loophole closed by HMRC.
Then we stopped using them!
Never contractual!
Loans, loans, loans you thick bastards!
Take our titles and we will regain them in court and expose your tuppenny faith under the rule of BRITISH law.
Dipshit Lawyers, SFA & the SPL, we have our licence and have accepted our punishment.
But, beware of the wounded Bear.
We’re coming to get you,
We’re coming to get you,
Cause we can!
I hate the pope’s sexual tendencies and Gingers RA, but we are bigger, stronger and simply, We Are The Best.
We’re coming to get you,
We’re coming to get you,
Cause we can!
Greatest ever atmosphere at Ibrox
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted