Jump to content

sammy cox

New Signing
  • Posts

    1,971
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sammy cox

  1. 2 minutes ago, GOAT said:

    Nope I'm certainly no hard man, probably couldnae fight sleep.  But as I said if you've got something to say, you have my seat details come up and we'll talk about it face to face.  My names Chris.  I don't need to hide behind a username giving out abuse on the Internet.  Anything I say on here I'll say in person.

    Well go into the Louden Chris and share what you said before the Aberdeen game.It's not hard is it.Never mind your pish on here go into the Louden or District and share your opinion with fellow bears and see how popular your opinion is.Never mind pish like I sit here or there ffs let's all say I sit here or there.Go into any of these bars and say what you said face to face with fellow bears.Never mind I sit here or there go into any of these bars before the old firm game and share your opinion as you say you will say it face to face so come on.I'm sure Greig in the louden will only be to happy for you to say what you said face to face with fellow bears.

  2. 13 minutes ago, MasterD said:

    Why not answer the questions? Most likely because you agree with what I said and are just drunk looking to argue over rubbish.

    Bed time for you old yin.

    As I say you know fuck all about me but what I do know is you like so many on here post some pish and then try to edit your post because you know you have made a cunt of yourself.Now fuck off and see who else is interested in your fucking pish as sure as fuck I and the guys sitting with me arent.Oh please don't get anyone on to me for being abusive as I don't know what I will do.PRICK OF THE HIGHEST ORDER.

  3. 5 minutes ago, MasterD said:

    Aye you've mentioned this about 100 times now. And as I've said time and time again god forbid I get the opposition wrong. Your old age is causing you problems.

    Do you think the midfield was good today?

    Do you think the transfer business in the summer has worked out well?

    Nothing wrong with my age and you don't know what fucking age I am.You are a fucking imposter like so many on here who just post absolute fucking pish for the sake of it.Not only did you get the opposition wrong but the venue as well.Will leave you to watching the Rangers on your stream/computer and let you continue spouting your usual pish.It's good for a laugh if nothing  else.

  4. 4 hours ago, MasterD said:

    Yep. As I said in the match thread it shows how bad our transfer business was when we've signed 5 CMs in the summer and Forrester last winter yet our midfield is still Halliday, Holt and a RB.

    Given how many midfielders we've been linked with and how many we need we'll surely need to get some out the door.

    Says the guy who thought Crooks had a cunt of a game against Aberdeen at Pittodrie until someone pointed out to him that Crooks wasn't even playing. Yep another high poster posting pish as fucking usual.

  5. 1 minute ago, K.A.I said:

    Yeah but the club (so to speak) are proven liars so .....

    Well we will have to wait and see.As I say I wouldnt have any of those cunts in Ibrox.We have done it in the past and I would do it every game.Give the tickets to our own and they could stick theirs up their fucking arse but that's another story just my thoughts on it as far as all of those cunts are concerned.

  6. 1 minute ago, K.A.I said:

    No you've not missed anything 

    it's upto you to believe what you want - even though I'm heavy in the op I believe what I was told ... club1872 are on the case so let's see the outcome 

    Well exactly.Let's see what the club have to say before anyone jumps the gun and starts world war three.I don't want any of those cunts in Ibrox and not just the GB none of them but that's a whole different matter again.

  7. 1 minute ago, William McBeath said:

    Your forgetting this is about Rangers acknowledging them by letting them into Ibrox early so they arrange their display when their name and banners are often a salute to the IRA?

    So Rangers have definitely said that the GB can come into Ibrox early and set up their display whatever that display is. As far as I can make out there is nothing definite by anyone.I may have missed something about it but don't think anyone has said that the club have definitely said they can.Could be  wrong right enough.

  8. 4 minutes ago, William McBeath said:

    That's true and the media under play the behaviour of their support because the GB are nothing new. I've seen the cunts on the news doing 3 man gun salutes and them calling it an incident whilst blurring the raised hands. If our wider support and all decent football fans were made more aware of this mob I'm sure they'd be in agreement at just how vile they are.

    I think most supporters know about the GB but also realise that for whatever reason the authorities and the board at cfc seem very reluctant to do anything about their behaviour. Anyway couldn't give a fuck about them, their club or anything to do with them.

  9. 10 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

    Comments from 2/3/4 people in this thread is the very reason Rangers will never have a United fan base 

    if giving the GB special treatment and letting them in early to do one of their displays can't get universal agreement then nothing ever will. 

    Sad days 

    The reality is we don't have a united fan base and haven't had for years. To many groups all vying for their own perch. It's bad enough trying to get 50 guys on a supporters bus to agree on a lot of things never mind 40/50 thousand. In saying that a lot of that 40/50 thousand are not members of any fans groups but ordinary guys like my mates and I who go along,watch the game and moan or laugh amongst ourselves after the games over a few beers. None of us interested in the politics or point scoring amongst some in these fans groups.

  10. 2 minutes ago, K.A.I said:

    I agree with you but the fact remains they have been let in before it's not an unbelievable occurrence or anything 

    what is unbelievable is the fact that after their 2 Hampden displays and Parkhead display we still allow it - unforgivable really 

    Well as I say let's see if they have asked,if they get in,and what if at all their display is or isn't.Perhaps I'm showing to much faith in the police to actually police such a situation correctly.

  11. Just now, Smile said:

    We do let them in i remember the last time UB were complaining as they faced more rigorous checks to get in than the scum did.

    My point is more that if these people wish to come and set up any kind of display that Rangers security chief and the police know who these people are and what their proposed display is going to be before letting them into Ibrox in the first place.It's not difficult to sort out.

  12. Just now, K.A.I said:

    In amongst that is a good point you make ... if it happens hopefully we are intelligent enough to take the names and ID etc ... not that I want it in the first place but if it's happening then it would be a good idea to do that 

    Well I would like to think that in these days of potential terrorist atrocities that Rangers security and Scotland's finest wouldn't be letting anyone walk into Ibrox without them knowing who they are and what as I say IF any form their proposed display is going to be.That might be putting more faith in Scotland's finest especially than they deserve right enough.

  13. 1 minute ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:

    Right so let's say we did something similar, full support holding up cards saying BJK, do you think we'd be allowed to organise it ?

    I have no idea what they want to do, might be Guid New Year but I doubt it, just hope the club know.

    One we don't even know for sure whether they are being let in to do any kind of display,plus we don't know what that display if any is going to say,but I would like to think that IF they are being let in to do any kind of display if said display is deemed illegal or grossly offensive that the police will prosecute the instigators of this display.Maybe putting to much faith in the police or Rangers security to actually acquire the names and addresses of the organisers of this display before letting them into Ibrox in the first place and finding out what said display is going to be.

  14. 1 minute ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

    When you say admit defeat what exactly do you mean?

    Those that doubt us, those who say we just won't win, those who say it's odds on (bookie stats) we'll lose?

    Cause if it's the 2nd category I haven't seen much of that tbh tho I've seen references to it.

    But I would agree certain teams would beat us today. Comfortably. Which I get as other teams budget, squad profile, international and European pedigree etc give cause to that.

    In Scotland, no. But do I EXPECT to beat every team, do I expect towipe the floor with the bheasts? No, no I don't.

    What I mean is so called supporters who are coming on here before games i.e. Aberdeen and saying that 25 year records are in the bin,saying they wish to congratulate Aberdeen on winning at Ibrox for the first time in 25 years and many more all before a ball is kicked surely that for any Rangers fan is fucking ridiculous.

     

  15. 1 minute ago, Chineseboy said:

    Yeh , because a value of a player always relates to how good he is. We paid 15 million for Duncan Ferguson. They paid less than a million for Larsson, so that obviously means Ferguson was the superior player.

    Think you might have slightly over valued drunken Duncan there sir

  16. 2 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

    It's a forum, I'm happy to debate.

    But suggesting man for man our squad is better than theirs is fucking ridiculous. Imo of course.

    Do you not feel on the other side of the fence that Rangers supporters who admit defeat in games before a ball is kicked are fucking ridiculous as well just as much as the people you are talking about who think that man for man our squad is better are fucking ridiculous.

  17. 10 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

    Indicative of the problem. 

    We get a decent bit of form and now we'll "fuck them" and "wipe the floor with them". Against a team who have only dropped points in one league game I think.

    By and large they've done what's needed without getting out of second gear from what I've seen. Whether they can raise their game when really challenged remains to be seen.

    Yeah we can beat them, I think there is a chance we will.

    But this sort of attitude is exactly what underpins this whole sack the manager, every player is shite, the philosophy is shite sack em all mentality.

    A bit of positivity, we're world beaters, then if things don't go how bizarrely predicated it's all to shit. It's like the England national team issue with their press.

    I suppose a bit of perspective is over rated though eh.

    Edit:

    And if you don't think the thumb, Dembele, Sinclair or Roberts are dangerous then you are either blinkered or a fool.

     

    I think we can beat them but as I've said in regards to every game it will come down to who makes the most or biggest fuck ups and which team capitalizes the best on those fuck ups as I'm sure fuck ups will be made on both sides.

    As you say we string a few results together ( results fully deserved ) and some get a bit carried away but that's up to them why not. On the other hand if results are not going well you have the other side of the fence wanting everyone from the boardroom to the bootroom fucked off out the door. This is the Rangers support for you good or bad depends on what side of the fence you are on.

×
×
  • Create New...