Sorry, I didn't realise there was a time limit. I'll do so when I get a chance.
While you wait, maybe you could read through some of the posts already provided which explain a few of the more 'tendentious' stuff in MD's FF thread?
Or maybe even try giving your thoughts on the issues in our statement? Or are all the questions one way again?
Issues in your statement. Perhaps if it was more precise and gave specific examples.
You mention there being a 'leak' and that person is still there. I'm making the assumption that you knew who is was so why didn't you do something about it? It couldn't be very hard to plant some false information to this person only and catch them out.
How many 'negative, political behind-the-scenes briefings' took place? When did they take place and where? How many attended?
Formation of Special Tasks Commitee - was this to restrict and control or was it to ensure that when people were representing the Trust they did so according to the rules?
Attempts to release incorrect information when addressing the resignations of their former colleagues - surely you were able to refute this then if the information was incorrect.
Dismissing and denigrating the efforts of the resigned members - who did this and in what way?
We have documented and commented upon the issues regarding the split in the board however the remaining board members have failed to release this disappointing but serious information to the membership - wasn't that partially the reason for calling the SGM?
Just a few questions before the more difficult ones come along.