Whilst I find it rather refreshing our board is so open and censor free I still find it puzzling that two articles in quick succession should appear in the defence of Muir. The second appear on the eve of the demonstration, was this in some way to undermined the demo and deter the undecided after all to call David Muir” The Saviour” is quite a leap of faith with nothing to indicate he deserves such a title(No doubt someone will tell us they have seen him walking on the Clyde on his way to Ibrox). Johnstone now appear to be a front man someone previously known to the Fans, as one of us therefore allying any suspicions and fears we might have, unlike “The Saviour” who now lurks in Johnstone shadow and would appear to be the power behind the throne. Which leads me to question just who`s interest is The Saviour looking after obviously Rangers in a roundabout way, but I still remain to be convinced that Rangers is his main priority. David Muir can only have one master which ultimately will leading to conflict of interest.
