Jump to content

Senna

Senior Member
  • Posts

    8,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Senna

  1. According to my Celtic supporting mate, they are turning it into a family stand with people being forcibly removed from their seats and friends and, ironically, families are being reseated apart from each other.

    I'd take anything my Celtic supporting mates tell me about their club with a pinch of salt. Entirely plausible idea though.

  2. A QC has only VERY recently been appointed to investigate this matter. My question to the OP is just how any copnclusion - interim or otherwise- could possibly be ready and in the hands of the non ex directors at this time?

    The OP will not name his source and that too gives me doubt.

    This may be a thread based on a rumour or hearsay.

    Having said that I hope the OP is spot on.

    This is only the interim report not the final one.

  3. sounds like you had great time yesterday

    everyone enjoying the party apart from you whos looking at the negitives

    SORRY I MEANT YAS GO RANGERS THERE WERE ONLY POSITIVES NO NEGATIVES AT ALL YESTERDAY EVEN THAT LATE INJURY DIDNT ACTUALLY HAPPEN.

    Better?

  4. I tried to buy a ticket, in fact I tried to buy a good few tickets, I couldn't because it was sold out .................... The Ticket office said it could have moved on another couple of thousand seats had they been avialble

    There were a few season ticket holders who didn't turn up and shame on them for not releasing the seats that lay empty.

    That's the sad part, that Bears were getting turned away and there were folk with tickets who didn't release them or turn up.

  5. handful

    a handful? people will be late, away for a pish or pie or both

    not everyone has to be in there seat for whole 90min

    There were two empty seats all game behind me, one in the row in front and one in my row. Not to mention the ones I saw elsewhere that were empty every time I looked.

  6. Nothing is impossible but this is highly improbable. This is talking about starting from scratch at a youth level, bringing in a director of football, 33% wage turnover, buying the right kind of players. It would require serious money to be thrown at it and Zen like patience from a notoriously impatient support.

    I'm not really arguing any of that save the scale of the money involved imo, but you still haven't answered what makes it infantile or shallow.

  7. The timing of this is interesting - it reads to me that it was carefully tailored with leaking in mind. Regardless, it's infantile and shallow thinking up there with super casino's and moonbeams.

    Some people need to accept the reality of our situation and stop all this day dreaming nonsense.

    The timing is rotten, but in what way is it infantile or shallow? Are those all things that you don't want at Rangers? They're not impossible (not even the Euro success by 2020, but that's nigh on impossible), given the right money, backing and implementation.

    How did Dortmund do it from being a kick in the arse off bankruptcy not that long ago? Feyenoord etc?

  8. And rightly so.

    It's all well and noble seeing people come out with "the attraction of Rangers should be enough, we're lucky to have a club" etc but fans are paying their hard earned money and not even getting a hard earned performance on the park from players who clearly don't give a shit.

    (tu)

    If we'd have been brilliant this season, I'd have made a way to fund a ST and still keep my finances workable, but it's a no-brainer after the 20 or so games I've been to this season.

  9. It's nice sentiment but never in a million years would any of that have even a chance of coming to fruition. Serious money would have to be thrown at it and patience would be required from fans who are desperate to get back to where we belong sooner rather than later.

    We've got at least two years until we get back to the top (as things stand) which would give us time. I think with that plan, the fans may have been more patient than under PLG, but we'll never know. Money might have been thrown at it, but only in areas that already desperately need it - youth and senior coaching, scouting and youth policy.

  10. it is still in place and all the legal fights have not altered that - you appear to be ignoring that.

    This is my point with the clubs who want to break away. Some people may wish to fight it through the courts, but as with the embargo, is it really going to change the outcome?

    Had we not had to bow to blackmail from the SFA, we'd never have had it put back on us. You know that and if you keep ignoring it, this debate is over.

    It might very well do, the SFL 10 are breaking their own rules if they follow through with this.

×
×
  • Create New...