five stars
-
Posts
2,975 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by five stars
-
-
Great chance to invest in the club, with all the cash raised going to improve Rangers. If you wait and buy shares from a broker later your money wont be invested in Rangers, it will go to those selling their shares.
-
Put in three extra rows of seats at the front of broomloan rear/copland rear ( like the ones in the goven rear), which will add an extra 1000 to capacity. All of the 1000 seats will have a great view. It will also help make the stadium look more modern where the upper tier slightly overhangs the lower tier.
Safe standing areas, either in parts of the enclosure or copland/broomie front. (not sure which area is more suitable for conversion)
Bars/cafe either in or just outside the stadium.
-
Adding an extra three rows to the broomland and copland road stands( like bar 72) would take our capacity to 52,000. The extra seats would also have good views, which might not be the case if we filled in the corners. No idea how much it would cost.
-
If information was leaked from HMRC illegally which damaged the company would this strengthen the possibility of a case against HMRC? Questions also need to be asked about the way they went about the BTC. Why were Rangers plc choosen out the thousands of companys that used EBTs, when realisticaly they were never going be successful in getting the 50m or whatever the total was. (even if hmrc won the btc before murray sold it seems most likely it would have forced rangers into admin and they would have only recieved a % of money owed). So it seems to me it wasnt about recovering tax payer money as it was a lose lose situation for HMRC as regard tax revenue.
-
Here are some interesting statistics from football365.com website.
Average attendances for home league games 2012/2013 season.
Rangers. 47,617
celtic. 33,724
Surely they can't still be out buying the school uniforms!
-
I've estimated how much HMRCs relentless pursuit of Rangers cost the British tax payers.
10 million - from refusing the offer to settle from murray
3 million - lawyers and staff costs of the BTC
12 million - PAYE which would of been paid from season 2011/2012
35 million - reduced PAYE (from a much smaller wage bill) and reduced Vat (from ticket prices being reduced). If we spend three seasons in the lower leagues at around 12 million a season.
Obviously I've made various assumptions, but I don't think it's an unreasonable estimate.
Hopefully the end-petition will get enough signatures to trigger a debate in parliament and HMRC can explain why they cost the tax paper 60 million quid.
-
There is an article in the sun today detailing arrests made for sectarianism since 2010. The figures show 909 arrests for abuse against catholics and 606 arrests for abuse against Protestants.
The bishop tartaglia is quoted in the article saying " It seems incontrovertible now that our problem is not so much sectarianism but anti Catholicism. This is regrettable because popular culture is inventing all kinds of new reasons to marginalise and hate catholics. "
So let's look at the figures again, 909 offences against catholicism which we can assume were committed by those from a protestant background. And 606 offences against protestantism by those from a Catholic background. Now we need now to take in to consideration that there are around 800,000 catholics in Scotland and around 3,500,000 from a protestant background.
My statistic skill aren't great but it seem that going by the figures that someone from a Catholic background is three times more likely to commit a sectarian crime than someone from a protestant background. 909 offences from a group of 3.5 million as opposed to 606 offences from a group of 800,000.
The bishop seems to want to put this head in the sand and pretend that there is no such thing as sectarianism just anti Catholicism. In my opinion not a good start by the new communications mouth piece of the Catholic church in Scotland after cardinal Keith O 'Brien gave up frontline duties after his bigot of the year award.
-
we should be asking why they tried to strip us titles as part of the five party agreement on radio phone ins, newspaper comment sections, blogs etc. I think it could become very uncomfortable for the sfa and force them into responding to a question that maybe they are unable to answer.
-
The way i see it is the sfa/spl wanted to strip us of around 15 trophys when we had not been found guilty of anything. It didnt look good for them at the time when the five party agreement was revealed in the media, the sfa said they would respond with a statement 48 hrs but they never did. With the result of the BTC going for Rangers their position now looks pretty desperate. Trying to force a club to accept a unpresidented punishment when they were not guilty. I may be wrong and of course they have the right to explain why. So again i ask the question why?
-
Again im not talking about spl commission. But an attempt to apply possibily the harshed punishment ever handed out in world football though the five party agreement when we had done nothing wrong.
-
More than a fan, im not talking about the spl commission, but the attempt by the spl/sfa though the five party agreement to impose possibily the strongest ever punishment on a football club.Why?
-
Think about it for a second. Attempting to strip a club of around 15? trophys, which as far as im aware is a punishment of a level never handed out in football worldwide before. Why???
-
Why did the sfa/spl try to strip Rangers of various titles and cups as part of the five party agreement??
Its a straight forward question, so why are we still waiting for the answer?
-
Plenty of journalists are self employed and arranged there tax affairs to minimise their tax liability.
-
The guy is pathetic. Gets caught lying on live TV, after having spent months bad mouthing Rangers over ebts. Then the next day has the cheek to question people morality!
-
The SFA should of been held responsible for allowing Whyte to take over. They are regulators of the game and are supposed to make sure anyone buying/running a club is a fit and proper person. Surprised some of the shareholder have not tried to sue the sfa for they clearly failed in thier duty.
-
Lloyds must of known what was going on. They wanted their money back before the result of the big tax case ,which if it went again Rangers, could of resulted in them losing their money. They would of known that Whyte was shady but forced the sale anyway. Dont know if they did anything illegal but as they claim to be a company with a corporate social responsibilty policy, they certainly didnt apply it on this occasion.
-
Dont think we have managed to get the balance right yet in midfield?
-
Thought Black played much better after what happened.
-
Good work, keep it up! Got a few idea to further our case. Will post later when im not using the mobile.
-
Im presuming he was singing Super Rangers and Follow Follow? It crazy.
-
What you on about?
-
It seems the sfa have been able to influence the press to drop the story. So maybe they feel they can now get away with not releasing a statement. Any decent journalist would be chasing them for their response. Any decent jounrnalists out there?
-
Dont forgot the serious allegation in the paper at the weekend from a SFL insider that there is a "witchhunt "against Rangers. You would expect the spl/sfa to have quickly released a statement rejecting the allegation. As they have not done so have we to presume that they agree with the statement?
Do you intend to invest in the Rangers Share Offer?
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
Would be great if fans invest the 10 million as we would then own 20% of the club. At this time of the year what are the chances?