Jump to content

Youllneverwinaway

New Signing
  • Posts

    2,983
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Youllneverwinaway

  1. can you not just post the other stats here ?

    Theres a lot though mate so its quite difficult. If ye want specifics then let me know though (tu)

    no bother. Wasn't looking for anything specific, just curious

    No worries mate. I have stats from every SPL referee from SPL existence so anytime or any accusation made, i can provide the facts even if they fly in the face of our accusations......

    Not that there is many who do mind you :lol:

  2. Funny isn't it

    only an arsehole on par with Traynor would excuse it.

    Your new mates Jake and YNWA may offer you some comfort but I'd be cautious who I lay with.

    Thats a bit out of line mate. I have answered every question you put including the Murray Steel one that you wanted answers on though i see you havent acknowledged or answered me on it.

    I dont know Soctbears intentions and i can only judge on what i read. From what i read, i think a few have jumped to the wrong conclusion on the intention behind SB intentions.

    (tu)

  3. I was dreading how Craig Thomson was going to referee the match considering his decisions in the last 4 games he has refereed us but I thought he had a good game.

    A referee really has to depend on his asssistant for offsides because the linesman should be the only one in the correct position to judge offsides and the Andy Walker lookalike got it wrong.

    I agree mate (tu)

  4. I do appologise for not having any info to hand to back up my arguement , just as you have no info at hand to back up yours , just " murray pumped in £100 million " , as did enic , dave king , the ntl money etc etc , maybe my choice of players was wrong , but so is your info ,Hurlock was not freed he was sold , Sterland went to leeds for more than he came for , the agm's back in the 90's never mentioned debt Murray's mantra was trust me everything is great, no problem

    Far too many murray appologist's cannot get their head's out the sand and see what we have become , two last day league in 8 years ,that may be success for you but not Rangers and certainly not for me

    youwilneverwinawa , in the interest's of fairness and since you like to see things in black and white , maybe you can produce yor evidence that murray has propped up rangers and indeed pumped money into the club , please dont use the share issue to back up your arguement as he had no other option bar Rangers going into administration and he also recieved the appropriate number of shares in return , ill look forward to your evidnce

    Thats a fking BRILLIANT arguement rbr - let me translate "I know you have made a valid point - but I am disputing it and as my argument is shit I will ask you to defend your statement without allowing you to use your strongest most valid argument, cause if I allow you to use the share issue then I am fked in this argument, I am down a hole with no where to turn to and no way out"

    You state an absolute fact Murray could have let Rangers go into administration (It happened to Leeds) but he didin't - Murrray stepped up to the plate and fixed his mistakes / gamble. It would havebeen easy for him to walk away - but he didn't he rollled up his sleeves, took the critisism on the chin and moved on. Do NOT ever believe that the money used was NOT real, it does not matter that it came from a MIM group or company it still made a big hole in the Murray Empire.

    He stepped up to the plate 'cause he had resources to do so. Does the though that he might not have not fucking scare you?

    Probably not

    Jimenez. I would like to think we have both enjoyed the chat as per previous posts mate.

    Murray took a gamble big style, chasing the dream that you and I would love to have the money to do. It didnt pay off, so as a result, he paid for it. It doesnt scare me at all because he personally GUARANTEED ALL DEBT against his fortune and property elsewhere. This means that never was a risk unless he went bankrupt which to be honest is never gonna happen when he generates £700 million revenue per year.

    His "gamble" in the Advocaat years is the equivalent of you and I buying a council house (tu)

  5. I do appologise for not having any info to hand to back up my arguement , just as you have no info at hand to back up yours , just " murray pumped in £100 million " , as did enic , dave king , the ntl money etc etc , maybe my choice of players was wrong , but so is your info ,Hurlock was not freed he was sold , Sterland went to leeds for more than he came for , the agm's back in the 90's never mentioned debt Murray's mantra was trust me everything is great, no problem

    Far too many murray appologist's cannot get their head's out the sand and see what we have become , two last day league in 8 years ,that may be success for you but not Rangers and certainly not for me

    youwilneverwinawa , in the interest's of fairness and since you like to see things in black and white , maybe you can produce yor evidence that murray has propped up rangers and indeed pumped money into the club , please dont use the share issue to back up your arguement as he had no other option bar Rangers going into administration and he also recieved the appropriate number of shares in return , ill look forward to your evidnce

    Thats a fking BRILLIANT arguement rbr - let me translate "I know you have made a valid point - but I am disputing it and as my argument is shit I will ask you to defend your statement without allowing you to use your strongest most valid argument, cause if I allow you to use the share issue then I am fked in this argument, I am down a hole with no where to turn to and no way out"

    You state an absolute fact Murray could have let Rangers go into administration (It happened to Leeds) but he didin't - Murrray stepped up to the plate and fixed his mistakes / gamble. It would havebeen easy for him to walk away - but he didn't he rollled up his sleeves, took the critisism on the chin and moved on. Do NOT ever believe that the money used was NOT real, it does not matter that it came from a MIM group or company it still made a big hole in the Murray Empire.

    sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you , firstly , there is no valid point made just assumptions based on murray saying when under pressure that he put £100 million into Rangers , no where in any of the accounts do we see any money being put into Rangers , enic yes , king yes , ntl yes ,murray nope , as to the he put the money into the club and he didn't have to , well technically you are correct however that would have had a direct consequence on three of his other companies which were directly involved with Rangers , but you would know all that as well , all I asked since you were the ones bleating on about evidence is to put up as that is what your whole arguement revolves around , so get it posted

    So there wasnt a £50+ million put in by Murray a couple of years back............Did we all just dream that ???

    What about the "APPARENT" £14 million your fellow Murray dissenter spoke about back in 1988 clearing the debt and buying out Marlborough.

    Are we gonna use "myths" to suit one side and not the other ?

  6. Now before i post this, let me state for the record that i know 2 Grade One referees(1 current and 1 just retired) through family and friends and i genuinely belive they do their job on the park which for me is a thankful task. Never the less, the following facts cannot be disputed. They are simpy a representation of Craig Thomsons SPL stats when refereeing the OF. (tu)

    When Craig Thomson referees Celtic they pick up on average 2.53 points per game played.

    When Craig Thomson referees Rgers they pick up on average 1.53 points per game played.

    :rolleyes:

    When Craig Thomson referees Celtic they pick up on average 1.47 yellow cards per game.

    When Craig Thomson referees Rgers they pick up on average 1.67 yellow cards per game.

    :rolleyes:

    When Craig Thomson referees Celtic they score on average 2.53 goals per game.

    When Craig Thomson referees Rgers they score on average 1.47 goals per game.

    :rolleyes:

    When Craig Thomson referees Celtic they have never had a player sent off.

    When Craig Thomson referees Rgers they have had 4 players sent off and he has a record of sending a Gers player off in 24% of his games.

    :rolleyes:

    If you want any more ref stats on the above then please PM....... (tu)

  7. Maybe it`s a generation thing but this is not the type of so called Rangers supporter that I would wish to be assocciated with his biased and hate of WS out weighs any justice towards Rangers and therefore doubt his credentions as a bluenose and for that reason fell he should be show the road

    Eh? I didn't want Smith back at Rangers this time round because I felt he was a limited manager who was shown up in Europe first time round and didn't think he'd learnt anything since. That doesn't make me or anyone else less of a Rangers fan unless you are the authority on what constitutes a Rangers fan and to be honest there's too many like that on here.

    Have you read the piece about him on the 'toffee website' where it says, plays boring football, constantly plays players out of position, takes the field with 5 centre backs and 7 defenders, tactically poor. That was my impression of him first time round and last season was a typically Smith team and tactics. This is what's being discussed in this thread, Miller being played out left when he's a very limited footballer with his left foot.

    Shut it you. Yer no a Gers fan and yer a Smith hater :lol:

    Jog on Decloid! :lol:

    :lol:

    (tu)

  8. Maybe it`s a generation thing but this is not the type of so called Rangers supporter that I would wish to be assocciated with his biased and hate of WS out weighs any justice towards Rangers and therefore doubt his credentions as a bluenose and for that reason fell he should be show the road

    Eh? I didn't want Smith back at Rangers this time round because I felt he was a limited manager who was shown up in Europe first time round and didn't think he'd learnt anything since. That doesn't make me or anyone else less of a Rangers fan unless you are the authority on what constitutes a Rangers fan and to be honest there's too many like that on here.

    Have you read the piece about him on the 'toffee website' where it says, plays boring football, constantly plays players out of position, takes the field with 5 centre backs and 7 defenders, tactically poor. That was my impression of him first time round and last season was a typically Smith team and tactics. This is what's being discussed in this thread, Miller being played out left when he's a very limited footballer with his left foot.

    Shut it you. Yer no a Gers fan and yer a Smith hater :lol:

  9. Maybe it`s a generation thing but this is not the type of so called Rangers supporter that I would wish to be assocciated with his biased and hate of WS out weighs any justice towards Rangers and therefore doubt his credentions as a bluenose and for that reason fell he should be show the road

    :lol:

    What generation do you put me in ?

    Again, you fall into the "whooshed" factor.

    :unionflag:

  10. I said the same last season.

    When he was 1st in charge has nothing to do with now, that's in the past.

    He doesn't know what he's doing, he's past it, he's a footballing dinosaur.

    (tu)

    Couldnt have described it any better myself.....

  11. This is a fcukin tarrier look at the name for fcuks sake, (youllneverwinaway) it's a reference to us playing 8 away games in the first 13 ! Open yer fcukin eyes ! :sherlock:

    A mentality i laugh in the face of. A mentality that i laughed at in Barcelona when 10,000 bears appeared abroad who had probably never been abroad before and sang a song they had never heard before. The chant in Las Ramblas was "fukc you Celtic youll never win the league, never win the league, never win the league." and every one of them missed the intention of the birth of the song in Lyon as we were dancing in the Stade Gerland singing our Champions League GET IT UP YOU to the TIMS "Fukc you Celtic, youll never win away, never win away, never win away Fukc you Celtic , youll never win away, never win away, never win away."

    :rangers:

    Loyal and True (tu)

    Tell it to the weans they believe ye ! (tu):sherlock:

    I welcome the questioning (tu)

  12. This is a fcukin tarrier look at the name for fcuks sake, (youllneverwinaway) it's a reference to us playing 8 away games in the first 13 ! Open yer fcukin eyes ! :sherlock:

    A mentality i laugh in the face of. A mentality that i laughed at in Barcelona when 10,000 bears appeared abroad who had probably never been abroad before and sang a song they had never heard before. The chant in Las Ramblas was "fukc you Celtic youll never win the league, never win the league, never win the league." and every one of them missed the intention of the birth of the song in Lyon as we were dancing in the Stade Gerland singing our Champions League GET IT UP YOU to the TIMS "Fukc you Celtic, youll never win away, never win away, never win away Fukc you Celtic , youll never win away, never win away, never win away."

    :rangers:

    Loyal and True (tu)

  13. You can say what you want about our own display but scoring at that time would have won the game for us, if the linesman had been doing his job right we'd have 3 points.

    Dont mistake me for being an official apologist. The linesman made a total arse of it, and i know that....... Its just that i believe Smith made a bigger arse of it (tu)

    Fair point but even with Smith making a fat bottom out of it we still would have won if the linesman had made the correct call.

    I think my point has whooshed over the head of folk Jake. Only trying to point out that smiths deficiencies put us in the position of sweating things out. Its great hearing him saying he is gonna be more attacking this season and when you hear the team you immediately think Misser up front with Boyd and Novo playing wide, then you see the way we are set up.

    Am scunnerred with him and it saddens me to say so when you consider he was in charge of our team for the best part of my life.....

  14. He's playing him as winger.

    Fleck is too young

    Aaron is not fit

    Lafferty is injured

    and as you say Beasley just back from international.

    That's it in a nutshell and there's no point overlooking any of those. The manager will have spoken to Beasley to gauge his fitness levels. If Beasley was 100% I'm sure he'd have played on the left and Novo would have been dropped for Miller.

    Remember that Spains under 17/19/21 coach said Aaron is very inconsistant, sometimes playing well and other times he's just anonymous but he's still young and needs understanding. Will he get it at this club?

    As much as i see what you are saying, i would still throw him in and give him a chance in front of Milller at Left fukcing midfield.

  15. You can say what you want about our own display but scoring at that time would have won the game for us, if the linesman had been doing his job right we'd have 3 points.

    Dont mistake me for being an official apologist. The linesman made a total arse of it, and i know that....... Its just that i believe Smith made a bigger arse of it (tu)

  16. As much as people want us to finish off games early, times will come - especially away to Aberdeen - when we secure all three points late on.

    For the linesman to rule off a perfectly fine goal AGAIN is criminal.

    So, to the muppet who started the "Dont blame the linesman" thread, if it wasn't for him, we would be sitting with 9 points instead of 7... and be top of the league.

    "muppet"

    :idiot:

    It would help if you could read through it all and read between the lines. Instead of resorting to insults, try and look at things objectively. Of course we would have had 3 points today if the linesman hadnt made an arse of it. My point is that if Smith was a GOOD or even a HALF DECENT manager, we wouldnt need to rely on last minute goals at the absolute pile of pish sheep shagger stadium to bring home 3 points.

    You are a muppet.

    You are trying to tell me that Man United or Real Madrid or Barcelona ALWAYS finish games off in 60 minutes? Sometimes we wont perform at 100% and will have to rely on last minute winners to see us through.

    When those are chopped off by an inept linesman, then how can you not blame him?

    So, if you plead "don't blame the linesman" then you can stick your "inbetween the lines" shite up your arse.

    More insults. <_<

    answer me 4 questions.

    1) Was smith correct to play Miller at LM

    2) Was Smith correct to leave Boyd on the park and take off Novo

    3) Was Smith correct to bring on JCD

    4) Is JCD finished ?

  17. As much as people want us to finish off games early, times will come - especially away to Aberdeen - when we secure all three points late on.

    For the linesman to rule off a perfectly fine goal AGAIN is criminal.

    So, to the muppet who started the "Dont blame the linesman" thread, if it wasn't for him, we would be sitting with 9 points instead of 7... and be top of the league.

    "muppet"

    :idiot:

    It would help if you could read through it all and read between the lines. Instead of resorting to insults, try and look at things objectively. Of course we would have had 3 points today if the linesman hadnt made an arse of it. My point is that if Smith was a GOOD or even a HALF DECENT manager, we wouldnt need to rely on last minute goals at the absolute pile of pish sheep shagger stadium to bring home 3 points.

×
×
  • Create New...