LoyalWilliam91

The board putting the Club into admin again would be a way of making some easy, much-needed redundancies. I'm no business or financial expert, but I think if the Club were to try that without being in admin, then they could be open to potential lawsuits. The Club (according to the board) has no creditors either. That's a good thing if it's true. Apart from the potential redundancies, there is no benefit of a second admin. Whatever happened to the expression: "Once bitten, twice shy"?

This has happened three times to me. Once, with the black training jersey and twice with the home jersey. On the third return, I just got my money back instead of exchanging it again. £45-50 is a lot of money for some people to fork out for a jersey, so they should be made to the highest quality. Plus, I con't really be arsed going through all the bother for a fourth time. You're not supposed to wash football jerseys over 40 degrees Celsius, you never tumble-dry them and you're not meant to use fabric softeners. I stuck by those rules and the sponsor print started to peel off after only 1-2 washes. The lady who served me in a SportsDirect told me that this has been a common problem with these jerseys. Even if you don't have proof of purchase, do what you can to get it refunded or replaced. Don't hesitate to contact Rangers straight up about it. Let us all know how you get on, mate.

Fair enough, mate. That is your opinion. My point is that I think Sandaza should've been given a second chance anyway. He might have turned it around. Or he might've not. Who knows? Thanks for reading, buddy.

I suppose we did, but I still think he should've been given a second chance. Thanks for reading, mate.

NEW BLOG: Double Standards http://williamcahill1991.wordpress.com/ Give it a wee read and let me know what you think, Bears. Feedback, positive or negative, is always much appreciated. Cheers.

I have family in California and in Belfast who are Rangers supporters. What I meant was that we'll be football fans whilst they bang on about the business side of the Club. I'm not saying that I, or anyone else, are better fans than anyone else. It's Rangers. We all do our bit, no matter where we're from.

Hi mate. I didn't see your comments last time, hence the reason you didn't get a reply. If you think boardroom matters are crucial, that's your opinion. Nothing wrong with what you think. Everyone is entilted to an opinion.

NEW BLOG: The Life and Times of a Rangers Fan http://williamcahill1991.wordpress.com/ Give it a wee read and let me know what you think. All feedback is much appreciated, positive or negative. Cheers.

Thank you, mate. Like I said, I do understand to an extent why some fans keep on top of boardroom matters. But some either take it too far and let it warp their wee lives or end up slating fellow Bears... Something I'll never condone.

Just published a new article, Bears and Bearettes. Would be chuffed if you'd give it a wee read. Feedback is always appreciated whether it's positive or negative. http://www.williamcahill1991.wordpress.com Cheers.

I have an old one from the 80s knocking around in my parent's home from a match at Ibrox against Bayern Munich. It looks like an old piece of yellow paper with blue writing on it, but it's quite something...

Yeah, totally. What I did was my choice. No-one asked me or put me up to doing it. Least of all Shane or anyone else at the CRO. Maybe the wrong decision to go onto that chat show earlier, but it's me who'd going to have to live with it. No-one else's fault or burden.

And for the record, I just want to make sure her and I are on the same wavelength.

Shane, tell the truth. I got you to come on here to back me up. I can't stand the heat so I need the big bossman to help me out

Who was this mutual friend here then?

Who pointed the finger at Pamela and Shane, Jon. Tell us? I'm sure it was you who did that though...

@BlueJon You're the one who's showing himself up here. Not me. There Shane gave it to you straight and you still won't give it up.

You could be wrong. You could be right. Who cares?

@BlueJon I never said that you can't be a Rangers fan if you weren't Scottish. I said that I believed Tommy wasn't a Rangers. Stop trying to twist my words.

Who was silent? I answered your question with an honest answer. All I'm not saying is the names of whom I spoke to prior to tonight. Something I've now said 3 times. You can ask all you like but I'm not naming someone without their consent.

@RFC52 So why did he hang up on me then? Twice.

You all know my links with the CRO but as I've said before, I'm not naming anyone unless I get their personal consent. But I do chat with Shane and Pamela a lot, as do I also chat with Chris Graham and a few other respected bloggers. Doesn't mean that they play a part in this though.

@BlueJon Who are "the other two"? Name them.

Fuck sake, Ed. You've just contradicted yourself. You said I was calling people names. Then you said I didn't. Which one did or did I not do?

I was never under any illusions. Ialso listened to many of the archives. It's a decent show. But the fact that a Yank with no connection to RFC is profiting off our fanbase makes me feel uneasy. I have no credibility according to whom? You? Yeah, I'll lose sleep tonight over that. No, the original plan was to discuss my blog. People warned me against it and told my why I should avoid. People I trust.