Jump to content

CanadaGers

New Signing
  • Posts

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by CanadaGers

  1. Exposing Dingwall is very much part of the good work and therefore has everything to do with it.
  2. I was there at that game and it was quite surreal, but we had to take a stand against them at that time as they were not taking any responsibility for the damage that they caused on a regular basis.
  3. Totally agree with you, Murray was right in what he did back then. But if the rules have changed then I can't see them getting away with banning us, we would probably just retaliate in kind anyway.
  4. Well we did it to them, unless the rules have changed?
  5. How ironic that Miller took it and missed!!
  6. Great find. Two faced hypocritical cheating c*nt.
  7. Stokes tackle was an absolute shocker. He must be condemned in the media the way Lafferty was for his foul on Hinkel. Incidentally, I'm sure that Hinkel played the rest of that match and didn't miss any games injured from Lafferty's tackle, unlike Papac. I feared before the game that Lennon would have them playing the way he did on the park and unfortunately I was correct. What gets me as well though is that I listened to Chick Young's post match interviews and he asked both managers about our penalty decision, but no mention of Stokes on Papac, Samaras on Bougherra, Loovens throwing Lafferty to the ground, Samaras kneeing McGregor or Samaras on Naismith when he finally was booked. I suppose for balance I should say no mention of McCulloch possibly getting a second yellow, but you see the pattern here. And the worrying thing is, none of us are shocked by this.
  8. So what was the outcome of the inquest into Darren Young's stamp on big Lee? Oh wait I remember, only one team is punished retrospectively, even if in the other incident contact was actually made.
×
×
  • Create New...