Jump to content

Colonel Mustard

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Colonel Mustard

  1. The officialish minutes of the phone meetings between SDM and Craig Whyte have now been released.

    No wonder D and P are in court trying to get the Ticketus deal invalidated. It makes for quite shocking reading IMO.

    Ring-ring. Ring-ring.

    Whyte..."Awright wee man? Ah want tae buy Rangers".

    Murray..."Show us your fucking dough then".

    Whyte..."Haud oan".

    Hangs up phone to make another call.

    Ring-ring. Ring-ring.

    Whyte..."Haw Ticketus cunt. Want tae buy some Rangers tickets fur aboot twinty four large?"

    Ticketus..."Aye. Show us the goods".

    Whyte..."Ah'll huv the fucking goods, don't you worry aboot that. Dae ye want the gear or no'?"

    Ticketus..."Aye right OK. Here's the Gene Tunney, but you better come across fuckface, or we'll be takin' it oot yer knob".

    Whyte..."Calm doon. It's cool. Ye'll get yur fucking gear".

    Hangs up phone to make another call.

    Ring-ring. Ring-ring.

    Whyte..."Wee man. Check ma bank. The dough's therr."

    Murray..."So it is. Deal done ma man."

    Whyte..."Sound as a pound."

    Murray..."Haw haw Craigie, ah see whit ye did therr".

  2. surely that what they want to hear and he's saying he wont.

    what is he going to rule on?

    Whether Rangers are legally bound to provide tickets I assume.

    He might say we are not, in his opinion, but won't offer any other comment or guidance.

  3. it does seem to be to add the money they think theyre owed to the list of creditors, ticketus themselves said they dont give loans but buy tickets, so wouldnt consider themselves a creditor... Whyte said he was personally on the line for the guarantees not Rangers, but i cant see how this would become the case without us liquidating...

    Why would Rangers need to liquidate for them to be able to sue Whyte?

  4. duff and phelps argument seems to be "its pure no fair"

    no wonder they have previously represented whyte who gave us the classic "hes got a cheek"

    seems clear the judge won't tell them its ok to not pay ticketus. so what will he tell them that helps?

    I thought the opposite, and that the judge was saying he wouldn't provide guidance, because it might influence a court case if Ticketus were to sue someone for either the tickets or the return of the money.

    No legal expertise here, but that's what I first thought when I saw it.

  5. Nice. I know there will be those that feel Rangers should be a football club and a football club only but I think there is a role to create other sports teams to serve a community. Especially in youth development considering the problems Glasgow and Scotland has with health statistics.

    Rangers have a good history of involvement with other sports, with the likes of the Ibrox Sports Days, and with players involvement in other sports right from day one.

    It would be a great way for Rangers to reach out to more youngsters to have a wider range associated with the club.

  6. It wouldn't surprise me if in the future a Rangers related Rugby club was established. Possibility for other sports like Basketball too. Particularly in the context of youth development for sports in general. Rugby is in dire straits in Scotland but is a growing sport with more and more money involved.

    But first thing first, Rangers FC needs sorting out before we move into any other sports. Can't see moving Sale sharks up here and you couldn't play at Ibrox unless they had two moveable pitches and that would require significant redevelopment at the stadium.

    Rangers have already been British Basketball champions.

  7. We continued to employ Gazza after his domestic abuse, and who on here hasn't applauded Shagger ? I fail to see the difference.

    I'd rather explain us being sponsored by a dating sitem than having to explain to weans how we used to go to see Rangers at Ibrox, where the flats are now.

    Of course tims will pour scorn on the idea, anything that is pro-Rangers is automatically wrong.

    Only a tim or a fool could argue that anything that strengthens Rangers is a bad thing.

    Really? You don't see the difference between what 2 players get up to and renaming Ibrox after a site such as this?

    Forgetting the fact that sponsoring the stadium is never going to be a deal that makes the difference between us going bust or not, I'd rather watch Rangers playing on Glasgow Green again than stoop to that.

  8. It is just a stunt, but if something like bought us two £3m players we wouldn't otherwise have had, that would be totally acceptable.

    I doubt anyone would sponsor that amount, but we'd be stupid not to bite their hand off for it.

    Maybe you missed the recent headlines about our finances.

    The bheggars would jump at it too.

    Rangers promoting a site for marriage cheats? How do you explain the immorality of that to weans who ask about the stadium's new name?

  9. You've lost me here - "a few more details"? About what?

    About what your request is about.

    It would help to have something more than a red-faced bellow to go on.

    Thanks.

    Red-faced bellow? ha ha

    Funny you are the only one that took it that way. I'm sitting here as calm as you like just wishing thatmy Club's fans would put on a show. Nothing more. You've painted your own picture and I don't need to exaplin myself any more.

    Only one post looks like somebody blowing a red-faced gasket and it's yours but like me you are not a wee kid so I won't insult you by asking you to explain yourself to me!

    Sleep well.

    OK, well that was a nice rant about nothing.

    Don't forget to take your blood pressure pills before you go to bed.

    Nighty night Mr Angry.

  10. Dear dear. The first communication I had with you was on PM in response to your comment in this post "what the fuck are you on about?". The OP up until that point had been taken the way it was intended - apart from you. Nobody apart from you is interested in the type of response that you posted (believe it or not) so I did take it to PM and ask "What the fuck is your problem, eh?".

    So as I said in our PMs you seem the only one not in control and other people would get bored with this. So if you want to continue with the type of stuff you've come away with above (in your mellow state) go back on to PM. But not tonight eh? I find you tiring. Oh and a complete fuckin twat BTW.

    Here are the PMs then...

    What's your fuckin problem? eh?

    Can I turn the tables here, and ask the same question.

    A few more details would be a great help.

    Thanks.

  11. Cheers JCD. Mr Mustard has been on PM with me about me losing the plot in my original OP. I just don't get how that comes across that way but hey ho!

    Please do not fucking lie on the board. I wasn't "on PM with you about losing the plot in the original OP", you fucking liar.

    You sent me a PM entitled "What the fuck is your problem, eh?".

    I then responded by PM, telling you to calm down and watch your blood pressure.

    You fucking lying cunt.

×
×
  • Create New...