hanleysguru

Whyte is the only show in town, for me. I'm deeply concerned about the stories concerning Murray and King which I've now heard confirmed from a source I consider to be reputable. If the Record is genuinely trying to get onside with those two, I'd be even more concerned.

It was unarguably a big decision, but so was the offside against Hooper as was the failure to send Healy off. We could have ended the game with 9 players. Collum is just a shite referee. I don't think we were awful, but thought we lacked commitment until it was too late. We can take that mob if we apply our selves. By the way, maybe just me, but I thought the shiny paper release was moronic. It was just embarassing before then. Seeing grown men holding Christmas wrapping as thought it acutally meant something...ffs

I can't believe some of the crap I'm reading on here. I'm 42 and have watched Rangers for most of that time. I've also watched media coverage throughout and it's utterly farcical to suggest that there is some kind of BBC agenda against Rangers. For those that say there have been no equivalent outrages against Celtic, you only have to listen to one of their fans chunter on for 5 minutes to get a glimpse of true paranoia. I've seen poor reporting on any number of issues, but for me this centres entirely on Whyte, and for all I know he might be as bad for the club as some have suggested. I'm not going to support him just because he happens to have bought Rangers - I have no idea what his motives may have been. I'm certainly not going to join some laughable protest against the BBC in a ludicrous show of solidarity with him. I'll continue to support Rangers without embarassing the club.

You're seriously sick, mate.

Sounds like sabre rattling by Whyte. The BBC will have had all the accusations passed for broadcast and to be honest, I'd be surprised if they're wrong in anything they've said.