8Ace
-
Posts
435 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by 8Ace
-
-
Nicely done. That video editing stuff fries my brain.
-
-
Fantastic reporting from BBC, no wonder they win awards...
Clam head.
-
No sanctions required for ritually abusing children?
-
Sounds like "chosenblue" from ££ has been busy. Good of George to leave his mobile number on that page too.
-
Did ye, aye?
-
Garagandy reported to uefa for sheep sacrifes tims maybe hopeing for another bye just like sion they have no shame.
So are they appealing against whoever they sacrificed the sheep to? Proof that even God doesn't like them.
-
I know it's not related but I found this tweet from a Celtic fan rather excellent, for many reasons
@Tighe77: @alpha_beatt Douglas can you look at the trialists rule for me please to see if you agree that sevco on Friday night played Daly and Law in>
@Tighe77: < @alpha_beatt their 4th league game when rules say 3 league games and 1 cup game i.e. ramdams cup game.If I am right there win is illegible
-----
Illegible? Aye not half
Sounds like you have found Charlie Nickerless on Twitter.
-
McColl does not like Mather because he, Mather, invested his own money in the club to the tune of 1M.
You think so, aye?
-
Muirhead mate you do realise that celtic appointed a ceo that knew what the fuck he was doing
So far all mccoll has stated is that he wants blin and murray in, one with little history in football and definitely not a fan, and the other with a more that questionable past with regards to our club
Do you really think that if and when Blin and Murray get on the board, that will be the end of it and it will just be left to turn to shit?
-
Jim Mcoll is no way a Rangers Supporter.
Is that such a bad thing, if it is true?
-
He stated he won't be investing
My mistake. I was sure I read elsewhere that has only said that he won't be investing in the short term. Also, by investing, does that mean purely financial or does it include things like time and effort, experience, business acumen and those kind of things?
-
Straight up simple question,
Lately all we have heard is that green and co are bad for us, take our money till we are skint etc etc, but for the life of me i cannot find any reason to think that murray and mccoll would be good for us
Can anyone shed some light as to why these guys are our supposed saviours AGAIN
JM does not need to rape the club for his own financial gain. He is a self made billionaire who I would imagine knows his way around a boardroom table. FB is his fixer who I would imagine he trusts implicitly.
What benefits could they possibly bring to a football club that has been put through the mill, or even any company that they chose to direct their attention to, for that matter. Answers on a postcard please.
You will notice that I have made no reference to PM.
-
McColl has stated he will not be investing and Murray has nothing to invest so the answer is "fuck all"
Has JM said that he will never invest, or is it just until there is a clear out and stability has returned?
-
He took the job on an interim basis after Green left to allow a suitable candidate to be found, then everyone on the board including Walter Smith decided that he'd done such a good job he deserved the role permanenty.
I don't really see the issue.
Exactly. I don't believe many of the board are suitable candidates for the positions they are in. Just because someone invests money in a company doesn't make them suitable candidates to run the thing.
Can you tell me who on the board is of similar stature to Jim McColl of Frank Blin?
-
Would you say Paul Murray is qualified?
As I have said elsewhere, I am not familiar with PM's background so I couldn't say whether he is qualified or not. I feel the main players are FB and JM.
-
Even if that's correct what exactly has he done wrong in the job?
He might not have done anything wrong as such, he just should never have been appointed in the first place. Not doing anything wrong, and being of suitable calibre for the position and being able to drive the company forward, are two completely different things.
No harm to the guy. Questions should be asked of those involved in the selection process. He seems to have got the gig purely because he was on the scene. Right place at the right time. Another posted stated elsewhere that apparently he didn't really want the job but that he took it to stop someone else getting it. Is that the kind of people you want in charge at Rangers?
-
Seems like its guilt by association
Though I have no problem with Mather
I have no problem with Mather. He might be a perfectly nice guy, but he is in no way qualified to be doing the job that he is. He simply should never have been appointed to a position of that stature.
-
We're going round in circles here, Jim McColl is a chancer IMO. You clearly disagree. That's me done here.
I am not aware of going in round in any circles. I made a point that you disagreed with and then I asked you to clarify what point you disagreed with? Fair enough the that we disagree, but it would be nice if you could at least explain yourself as to why you disagree with me.
So, Jim McColl, a successfull self made billionaire, is a chancer? Okay then.
I can't say the same for Paul Murray, but the chance to have guys like McColl and Blin involved with the club in any way should not be overlooked.
-
Sorry but I cant take you seriously after that first sentence.
Are you referring to my clear typo in having typed "with" instead of "without"? Or do you disagree that he has managed to actually do plenty without buying shares? Or is it the fact that he hasn't invested any of his hard earned cash so therefore he should be excluded from doing what he can, in the way he knows how, to help the club?
-
So what agenda driven memory do you have?
That whyte got to admin before hmrc enforcing it to allow d&p in? Correct.
That once the judge ruled d&p were in hmrc complained and it dragged on for days before hmrc stood down on this one?
Whyte won a race to get d&p in that is it... nothing more.
D&p have been investigated and I am sure bdo would have said something before now.
So you agree on that? Why would it be of any benefit to him to win that race?
-
And hmrc did not object to d&p
That's not how I remember it. As I said, I remember it being seen as a victory for CW to get "his people" in place at the last minute.
-
If he had genuine concerns why not buy shares so he can have power to do something about it?
He seems to be doing plenty about it without having bought shares. His experience, knowledge, contacts and business acumen would be invaluable to Rangers. Nobody comes close to him or Frank Blin on the current playing field. That is the level that we should be operating at.
-
Apart from all those who investigated it you mean?
But as fishing attempts go it is very minor league, as is to be expected.
While it may have been investigated and nothing illegal or untoward found, it still doesn't mean that the situation wasn't directed in the desired path. Why would Whyte want "his people" in place to handle the process. At the time, this was seen as him getting one over on HMRC, if I remember correctly?
scotlands second highest paid manager
in Jimmy Bell's Kitroom
Posted
I do like the refreshing honesty on this board.