Viva La Vuvuzela!

all the placard waving and pipe smoking doesn't make you anywhere near right old chap, I think others will judge for themselves. By the end of next week I imagine you'll be apologising to yours truly, cap firmly in hand. You have called many things right, I've been watching you - but you don't know it all, that's for sure.

Not Rangers - other interested parties, yes. It will benefit the club and perhaps keep others from having some awkward moments in court, it will work out well for us as a football club though and that is all that matters.

He got half right to be fair.

I'll let others judge your climb down, quite hilarious resorting to that for a comeback, I'll be back with more soon, you get to bed, your Baw is truly burst Nigella.

Time will tell of I am right or wrong, and I never stated Whyte was involved only heard that he was preventing investment with his supposed claim, of course it's bullshit but now it won't have to through the courts - do you get it now? do you? Probably not.

See above quote BB.

What faux pas? Any pay off that may have taken place was concerning other parties, nothing to do with Mr King bud...he is just being reactive.

Timescale wise I think it will be shortly I do know we are in for some positive news regards Dave King's involvement Apologies for any confusion, you were right to pick up on it.

How is it possible Dingwall still holds so much sway, his day is long past surely? It's frustrating he can use a website to remain somewhat influential.

Very Good bud, very good news indeed.

Judge me by the end of next week lads, that's all I can ask, any more info comes in I will PM a Moderator to do with it as he wishes

I thought you'd like it. Listen, I actually agree with a lot of what you say on here but I think we are in for some VERY good news shortly regarding Mr King.

I just did! I wouldn't be happy unless he was prepared to take the club forward and buy in to us in a big way, otherwise I'd be happy for the board to carry on - but from what I've heard that will happen. Meaning serious cash will be injected. It's related to Whyte taking a pay off, he will now be out the picture, more when I get it.

Whose woods these are I think I know. His house is in the village though; He will not see me stopping here To watch his woods fill up with snow. My little horse must think it queer To stop without a farmhouse near Between the woods and frozen lake The darkest evening of the year. He gives his harness bells a shake To ask if there is some mistake. The only other sound’s the sweep Of easy wind and downy flake. The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep We have seen the darkest evening of the year and survived my friends, the time is coming soon and the day will be upon us, when no Timaloy nor Dolly Sheep shall dare to enter near our winter's keep... A little white necked raven tweets that Declan has had his fill, so take your place in mud so deep on Ypres muddy fields, this land we sought to claim before shall beckon to our call, do not be thrown by Brendans whimper nor strayed by Salmond's leap... For all that has been set before us will be destroyed by Dave King's Meep. Heard it tonight for real lads, Dave King is in on the action, watch this space!

Always felt Murray was aware of more than he let on, can't help but hold him responsible for leaving us to the mercy of these types of characters.

Cheers, just fed-up with these constant attacks from our enemies, I take it this stuff will have no effect on the club moving forward then because it's all oldco related?

Should the club release a statement concerning this or not in that case Gogzy? It feels as though they are continually taking a swipe at the club, with the Rebel and Jackal leading the Witch-hunt.

That went down well

Cheers lads, saw Jack Irvine's name here too, maybe Bawsburst or Mr McCoist can enlighten us further!

Who's this chap Ali Rizvi? He wasn't even at the club when Ahmad and Charles were there, more nonsense from that rhag?

LAST year the mystery blogger account caused a furore among Scottish football fans after leaking tapes and documents about the Ibrox crisis and a judge has ruled some of the information can be used as evidence. A MYSTERY blogger who leaked secret recordings of Craig Whyte and Charles Green on the internet is set to become the focus of a £28million Rangers court case. Last year the Charlotte Fakes Twitter account caused a furore among Scottish football fans after releasing a tranche of tapes and documents about the Ibrox crisis. At the time much of the information could not be covered by newspapers and TV stations because of legal concerns over its source and authenticity. But this week a judge ruled that some of it could be used as evidence in a court case, reigniting interest in Charlotte’s shadowy online world. Rangers’ liquidators BDO are locked in a legal battle with Whyte’s lawyers Collyer Bristow, claiming the law firm was partially responsible for the downfall of the club, and guilty of negligence and breach of trust. Collyer Bristow have denied the allegations. And in a pre-trial hearing held on Monday in London’s Royal Courts of Justice, judge Mr Justice Newey ruled that recordings of Whyte in conversation with others involved in the takeover released by Charlotte Fakes were admissible as evidence. As well as tapes of Whyte discussing his Rangers takeover, the account published a host of highly embarrassing e-mails between the club and their PR advisors, along with documents concerning the club’s finances. In some of the recordings Green and Whyte appear to discuss their plan to carve up control of Ibrox. In one tape thought to have come from Charlotte Fakes, Green says to Whyte: “You are Sevco, that’s what we are saying.” In another, Whyte launches an attack on manager Ally McCoist, saying: “He’s been saved by this process. Disorganised guy. Desk in a total mess with papers from six months ago. He wouldn’t have been there if it weren’t for the admin process.” In yet another recording Rangers’ then finance chief Brian Stockbridge discusses selling £5million of shares in the club to a convicted fraudster on Interpol’s most wanted list. Stockbridge is heard talking to Whyte and the club’s axed commercial director Imran Ahmad about a possible cash injection from Rafat Rizvi, who is being pursued by police. Stockbridge says: “How widely is it known? Rafat’s name is not mentioned anywhere, is it?” Ahmad replies: “No, it is.” Stockbridge says: “You could get a headline saying, you know, ‘Convicted...’” But Ahmad assures Stockbridge “there’s no paper trails” linking Rizvi to Rangers and adds: “There’s no connection.” Stockbridge says: “If someone starts digging in there...” During the discussions, Whyte asks Ahmad: “So Charles and Rafat are closer than you and Rafat?” Ahmad replies: “I’d say the relationship is equal.” Rizvi features on Interpol’s wanted persons list under the name Ali Rafat Rizvi - and has done since 2009. He was sentenced, in absentia, to a 15-year jail term in Indonesia for allegedly stealing from Bank Century, in which he was a shareholder. But Rizvi, a UK national who was born in Pakistan, has been able to live as a free man in London and Singapore as there is no extradition treaty with Indonesia. The Charlotte Fakes leaks- followed by more than 10,000 people online - also targeted Rangers PR man Jack Irvine. In emails he appeared to boast about bullying journalists and he signed one message off, “No surrender”. The account led to a huge online debate, with fans discussing who was behind it and whether the documents were genuine. The blogger seemed to have unlimited access to sensitive print and audio information and many of the audio recordings appeared to have been made by Whyte himself. At the time various theories concerning the source of the leaks ranged from Whyte to Green to a mystery overseas hacker. To this day the true source is not known, despite sustained attempts by many of those written about to establish the blogger’s identity. But there is general consensus that the information was genuine. In court on Monday Cyril Kinsky QC, representing Collyer Bristow, said there were concerns that the recordings may have been illegally obtained, but he claimed that they had been circulated widely on internet forums and so were no longer confidential. Last year Police Scotland said they were investigating the source of the leaks, but Mark Phillips QC, representing BDO, told the court that police last week dropped their objections to the recordings being used as evidence and that Craig Whyte himself had no issue with them being heard. Philips argued that transcripts of the recordings should be partially redacted to remove references to confidential legal advice received by Whyte, and Mr Justice Newey agreed that edited transcripts should be made available. The case is due to be heard next January. http://www.dailyreco...e-fakes-3159443

All this arguing just provides fuel for our enemies lads, try and keep the debate civil

Was he not one of Gordon Smith's trialists?

Cheers bud, I realise what I said was in poor taste and wish I could take it back, same sincere apology goes to other Bears I may have offended. I was a keen advocate of building a new system with youth taking precedence and it hasn't quite panned out that way, it wasn't meant to insult Nacho who was a terrific servant and remains a tremendous ambassador by all accounts. Had to laugh at the Gallowgate comparison, that's about right mate! VLV