LaudrupsPatrickBoots

Until the first league defeat of the season, was that the deal?

Thin ice.

Good luck to him. He just wasn't ever going to be good enough for us.

So what you want me to do is discount Neymar's career before he was 21 but still include Ronaldo's? 7 seasons against 4. That'll be a fair argument won't it

I blame @gogzy tbh. He changed the wrong name then disappeared

I didn't take Ronaldo's PL seasons out the equation too. You were dismissing Neymar's goals in the Brazilian league so I used his stats from when he joined Barcelona at 21 til now against Ronaldo's stats from 21 to 25. I thought that was obvious.

Thanks very much for that

Ok, take the Brazilian league out of the equation. Neymar joined Barca at 21. Between the age of 21 and 25 Neymar has more goals than Ronaldo. Arguably better than him at 25. Ronaldo now is miles ahead though. It's not impossible that Neymar could reach that level though. Then again he might go to PSG and flop, that's the thing about potential. You never know how it'll work out.

Aye it's maybe a bit ambitious you should definitely count yourself

I do owe a name change, Gogzy changed the wrong name and never done mine but I think @KeyserSoze decided to let me off with it

I wouldn't know. You asked to see the argument so I showed you. Once you've got your excuse for the international goals I'll be happy to read that too.

Shameless final bump. Into the last hour on the just giving page before my fundraising stops for another year. Last chance for anyone else to donate to a great cause. https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/rossmckay

Fucking hell

Potential to be the best in the world, not sure PSG is the place to do it though. At 25 he's still got plenty of time to improve and he's arguably better already than Ronaldo was at that age.

PM me the family members name.

Burton's record signing Liam Boyce ruled out for the majority of the season with a cruciate injury. That could've been happening to us if some on here had their way

If it's someone I used to know then I don't associate with them at all, full stop. That's not the case here hence me not using that term. It's not me that's being confused by it. We're not going to agree here, I know what I know and you've heard what you've heard. I don't really care if you agree with me or not and vice versa so it's really a pointless debate so we can leave it at that.

Aye that's what I do. I make things up on the internet to make myself seem important. Run along.

How the fuck am I offended just because I've pointed out something isn't true? Fuck up

I do know him now. There's a difference between not being close to someone and not knowing them and that seems to be confusing you here. I used to spend a lot of time with him but don't now due to differing views. I still occasionally find myself in his company though and still find out about what he gets up to. That's how I know about the group. I know how much they've changed from starting out until now. It's just nowhere near what this article claims. They've been involved in republican parades and the like but it's certainly not a requirement for new members to have to take part or they won't be allowed to join.

I used to be close to a guy who started the group. He's still heavily involved with them. I don't know where you've got the assumption that he was only involved in their infancy and isn't now.

Has your account been hacked by a retard?

You're right. My opinion isn't the same as yours so obviously I'm just making all this up. Apologies, I'll stop replying and let you continue passing off rumours as facts.

Jesus Christ are you really that fucking dim? I never said I don't know him. I said I used to be close to him but I'm not anymore, obviously I still know him. You said I claimed I used to know him which wasn't what I said. Hope this helps.