sonowilliam1

You see how easy it is,i've been on this forum for five minutes and their is so much venom,initially it was directed towards Craig Houston and only now we are getting to the crux of the matter ( for some )   i would much rather take a risk with David King than with his predecessors.
 
Craig helped us to get rid of the spivs and i'm forever grateful on that front,has he became too big for his shoes -  Possibly ? I just don't get why folk are hell bent on slagging him off.

So you're two years older than me - Thought as much.

So you're two years older than me - Thought as much.

Just wanted to know how you felt about the poor treatment of Craig and the members by Club1872?

Why was Craig put into the position of having to release a statement, when Club1872 could have aired the meeting on the Club1872 website?

In bold above. That will never happen with Dingwall, the most divisive figure in the history of our support (closely followed by Chris Graham). Big Mark has to be in control, the censorship on FF is proof of that. Dingwall is a cancer that should have been removed years ago. Never mind the fact that he's happy for bheasts to have post counts in their thousands.
What was your username on here previously?
 

Thanks gogzy,i'll certainly look after you when you come across to ff again 

What a pish response.

It's like a game of tennis between both forums,hopefully one day we'll all pull in the one direction.
What you've got to ask yourselve tho... is Craig Houston really such a bad guy ? He like anyone will make mistakes and undoubtedly have an opinion which doesn't particularly fit in with this forum.We have folk on this thread who dislIke David King,why ?
We had folk on here that was giving it biglicks to McMurdo ( jnr ) - Why.
Craig is certainly not perfect but over the years he's most certainly gave it a go to help the Rangers and rid us of the spivs and like or loathe him he merits some respect for that alone..