BrigBear 3 Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 If tbk were really all about saving our club and being fans with money, shouldn't they have just put money into greens consortiam along with Kennedy to make sure we made a better offer in the cva? all hindsight now but just a thought to discuss.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 If tbk were really all about saving our club and being fans with money, shouldn't they have just put money into greens consortiam along with Kennedy to make sure we made a better offer in the cva? all hindsight now but just a thought to discuss..It's already been said a hundred times, HMRC would not have dealt on a CVA for any amount. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
8watp8 254 Posted June 15, 2012 Share Posted June 15, 2012 If tbk were really all about saving our club and being fans with money, shouldn't they have just put money into greens consortiam along with Kennedy to make sure we made a better offer in the cva? all hindsight now but just a thought to discuss..TBH i think a cva was always going to be rejected by hmrc, just frustrating if they new that why they didn't say months ago and we could of gone down newco route.Just my opinion but i believe the blue nights etc got to a point that they new a cva would be rejected so didnt get involved as they didn't want to be seen as the ones who got a cva rejected and liquadated a company, thats why within hours of cva being rejected in steps walter and the blue nights etc again to take control of new club, as i say just my opinion Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.