cooper1989 0 Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Not sure.. but didn't Walter say today that the Naismith money was 'well spent' on Steven Whittaker? Not disagreeing there... But here's the question... Who would you rather have? SW or SN? Me? Whittaker... Strong, superb link-up with Hutton -- immediate understanding...looks for goal etc.etc. Comments? What would be the case for SN over SW? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,971 Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Whittaker already good Naismith isn't much better than what we've got. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper1989 0 Posted August 24, 2007 Author Share Posted August 24, 2007 ok that's 2-0 for SW! I think the only way we get SN is if the Killie chairman (Michael Johnson -- or is that Jackson) comes crawling back to us? jeez and I was wondering where wacko jacko went? Seems he's now Chairman of Kilmarnock Football Club! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Maestro 11,971 Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 We need people that Walter knows will be good all the time where I think Naismith would be a bit hit and miss. That's why we wouldn't pay over the odds for Naismith who shows it spells. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooper1989 0 Posted August 24, 2007 Author Share Posted August 24, 2007 On a more serious note than my last post... :-) Agreed -- I think all bears/bearettes are now becoming more convinced that Walter is NOT buying duds. imho -- what the made the difference is that -- as Scotland manager -- he actually had to go and look at players -- like Naismith/Whittakter -- and he has spent the money based on that experience. So.. I don't see anyone arguing with Walter at the moment. He's done a great job imho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts