Jump to content

Elite81

New Signing
  • Posts

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Glasgow

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Elite81's Achievements

New Signing

New Signing (1/12)

0

Reputation

  1. Of course he'll be back in a matter of weeks. Maybe not with the website, but you can't be that obsessed with Twitter and Rangers and suddenly give it up. He clearly has no friends (unsurprising) and therefore spends all day, every day on Twitter. He worked out if he spewed out his hatred for Rangers then Celtic fans would like and retweet him, and he could pretend they were his friends. I remember him once tweeting he was going out for a bit and would be back on Twitter in a few hours, as if the whole Twitter community was waiting for his return. Delusional idiot.
  2. They haven't said they're boycotting Rangers games, they said they're boycotting Ibrox. So yes, they would show the final, but like you said wouldn't run any interviews on camera.
  3. "Man Utd, you either love them or you hate them." Personally I'm indifferent to them. Not bothered about them either way.
  4. You do realise the order the teams come out of the hat has no bearing on what day the games get played? Expect the Rangers game to be the one televised whoever they get. Possibly even 3pm on a Sunday since the BBC have no other game clashing with it (hearts/Caley last year was only lunchtime because of six nations rugby).
  5. Them? They? Don't let him convince you there's a team of them, it's his site, his personal twitter. He advertised on twitter asking if people wanted to create a five-a-side. That would suggest he had no friends in the outside world to ask. Seriously, who would need to go on twitter and ask strangers to help you fill a 5-a-side team? Does he not even have 4 friends?
  6. He can't put it on his CV - he didn't even manage to complete first year of journalism there so never left with any qualifications. Then tried to tell anyone that would listen that he never wanted to be a journalist anyway.
  7. Was thinking along the same lines. Was there anything really anti-Rangers in the article? It was a piece about the lack of success Aberdeen have had - not entirely sure it merited the hostile reaction, or any sort of reaction for that matter.
  8. Can I also suggest people e-mail ESPN UK, who have Andrew Muirhead as their Celtic blogger, and suggest they get someone else to represent them (surely there's one out there) rather than that moron. That would hurt Muirhead, who gets paid for that gig and relies on the hits from it coming to his site. It must be embarrassing for them though. Rangers columnist is John DC Gow - theirs is Muirhead, a guy who couldn't even pass first year of a college journalism course and can barely construct a sentence. Not much of a comparison.
×
×
  • Create New...