stevie1984

I dont have an opinion on what Green thinks. Ive only quoted what he said, seeing as its relevant to the current situation. The worry that charles has now isnt the stripping of titles, its the financial implications that it could have on him and his investors. Anyone that thinks he gives two fucks about titles we won years ago is deluded. He is here for his £2m payoff, and nothing else. Some of us would be wise to remember this before we start proclaiming him as a hero.

Half the Scottish support probably doesnt even come from the spl. They chanted because he made a good save, like he did countless times for us. We really are the most tragic, petty country in the world when it comes to football. Of course fans from other clubs dont like us or our players. Thats what happens when you win too much in any country. See Man Utd in england for example.

Ill assume you have the painters in and ignore your last comment. You are usually such a nice poster too. No need to hate on me because i prefer a blonde.

I wasnt attempting to slate green. if you have time to read the whole thread, i was only correcting a poster that said he only said it would happen if nobody bought the club. A tarrier says we have no history because the cva failed and hes a cunt. Charlie says it and its an honest mistake. The only people that say it have ulterior motives. Green included. If people think he said it as an honest mistake, nothing i say can change that. The brainwashing is too strong. Our biggest enemies have always come from within, but you keep believing in the bogey man if it makes you feel better.

haha. You fancy the arse off me. Youve no chance.

Eh? What do you mean? This is my only account. I didnt know you could have more than one.

I posted the video already, but here it is again, just for you. 1:40 onwards. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18369796 Yes they were his exact words, and they were said in the context of a cva failing. I appreciate im starting to sound like a bheast by repeating this, but its amazing how many bears have never seen this. For the record, he was wrong, but he still said it to get the support behind his pretend cva bid.

I forgot only english people live in england. Silly me

Keep yer drawers on Germaine. If you cant take a wee joke about your lips on a football forum, i suggest you grow a thicker skin, or dont post your pic. Btw, you couldnt lace BTs bra.

Link please, ive never seen any.

Aye, fuck me for looking for debate on a forum. I cant answer your questions, because i dont know the answers. I am neither qualified or have all the evidence to decide if we are guilty, or if the spl should have acted sooner. Its full of legal technicalities now, and is best left with the lawyers. I think people forget that charles signed an agreement that leaves us open to further punishment, when we were blackmailed to get back in the league. Why did he not say all this at the time? He signed away what little power he had, when he had them by the balls re the sky deal that was dependent on us being in the league.

Christ another kitchen warrior. You have some neck calling me a "dubious poster". Do you never read your own posts?

You should go early to the next game then and go to the ticket office and explain it. Im sure youre not the only one its happened to. I know its not a large sum of money, but it does seem wrong.

Fanboi no1 arrives on his white horse. What would the birds on this forum do without you to defend their honor. Ya big creep.

I agree 100% with that. Our problem is much closer to home.

Better to be quiet and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. That quote could well apply to you and charles.

Charles has already said he has utmost respect for the panel that will judge on it, so i cant see how we wont get a fair hearing. His defence is its fuck all to do with him, so we have nobody from the club present to defend our position. Of course they all want us dead, i dont think ive ever disputed that. Maybe he has received rock solid legal advice that means that pleading ignorance is the best way to go. If thats the case, he should just let it play out in the courts, because thats where it will be heading when the ruling goes against us. If the worst case scenario happens and they do decide to strip titles, will we stop singing about 54 titles? Will our memories be erased of any titles they strip? Its nothing but a legal battle, that has very little to do with football. Leave it in the courts, not on the battlefield. Personally, i cant believe the easy ride charles is getting for saying our history is swept aside if the cva fails. Just as well hes not on this forum, otherwise hed be tarred and feathered before he got a dozen posts.

Aye very good. That makes all of my other points invalid. You do know you can read newspapers online, dont you? So typical of some people on here to try find the smallest detail to pick on instead of dealing with the real point of the post. Whatever floats your boat.

This is what happens when we give women wireless internet. They can post utter shite from the kitchen. Away and take another pic for your wee virgin fanbois.

What a stupid comparison. Our players were pulling 20k plus a week. What was Black on at Hearts (SFL3 feeder club)? £1/2k? You really think if a Premier league team came in for Black tomorrow and offered him £20k a week, he would stay with us?

It was written in a national newspaper, so we should take notice of whats said. Ignoring things we dont like or dont agree with got us in this mess in the first place. This is a case of charlies previous comments coming back to bite him and us in the arse. This is the problem when you say things that you either dont know about, or to try convince supporters to come around to your way of thinking. Sometimes in our situation, silence is golden from our owners. The onus is on them to prove liability, not on us to prove innocence. This whole, "its nothing to do with me" defence can only end badly.

I think your missing his point here. He is paying more up front for a book, when its cheaper to buy each game separately. Its a fair enough complaint, as is expecting the club to respond to an email that a book holder sends. You should try one of the dudes on twitter mate for an answer. Im sure a few on here use that for a quick answer.

The video is worth watching to the end to see him squirming his way out of a question regarding the terms of the loan to the club if a cva went ahead.

While the article that the Op has posted is no doubt written by a rhabid beast, it does us no favours to try re-write history. Charles said that if Dave King got his way and the cva was refused, that our whole history and tradition would be swept aside. The full comment wasnt in regard to nobody purchasing our club, it was in regard to the cva failing and us going the newco route. Link to video below so people can decide for themselves. Its open to debate what he meant about our "history and tradition" would be swept aside, but denying he said it in regards to a cva failure, is only lying to yourself. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18369796 1:40 onwards for the cva comments.

Some memory you have there man. I have no recollection of that game at all. Strange.