BigManBlue

Whatever turns you on, is it a love in you want with the scum bags

Just for you info I receieved this from my fellow supporter of 30 yrs, obviously I have replaced our real names, make your own minds up but this is from one of the beat Rangers fans I have ever met yellowcross <_< Hi Brother Whats going on at the RST with those top members resigning Cheers BigManBlue My brothers reply, Don,t know brother, not heard a thing but then again i,m only a member. I joined at the very start for 5 years, went to a few meetings and never went back. I got the feeling it was full of people who thought they were better than everyone else, you know the super/duper Rangers fans and people who were in it to get something for themselves. It was evident early on that it was full of little back stabbing cliques.

Everybody is entitled to their opinion but this is one of the most naive I have ever read Thats just my opinion mate

And I take exception at you taking exception. As for you neither knowing the difference between opinions and facts; nor what a debate is, that I don't care about. I'm sure you're old enough to take responsibility for your own education. LOL - that's really all I can do to that. Coincidence, thats exactly what I did

Gentlemans agreement guaranteed <_<

Watch it, you're dealing with a keyboard hard man :angry2: I thought so

http://sport.scotsman.com/football/Title-p...gers.4121825.jp http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/rugbynation...91466-20978937/ http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,1...3616074,00.html http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/...p;TEAMHD=soccer And who was the ventriloquist, McCulloch ??

Walter will decide that <_<

With all due respect (since I like what you have to say most of the time) if you cannot come into this debate and add at least a modicum of your own thought then don't bother at all. First of all I will post as I choose. Secondly this is not a debate, it is just you and friends (or you under other names, I neither know nor care) spouting poorly informed rubbish about the RST and Frankie doing an admirable job of putting you right. Not that you'll pay any heed. But thanks for the positive feedback Is that a nobody messes with me attitude I detected there, oh sorry for butting in !!

What about the lump of wood McCulloch he has cost an absolute fortune well he's a managers favourite, not much we can do about him. On form he isn't a bad player. On form he isn't a good player either !!

What about the lump of wood McCulloch he has cost an absolute fortune well he's a managers favourite, not much we can do about him. On form he isn't a bad player. Ah managers favourite, Miller !!!

http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Ne...1319481,00.html Yes but which football club will he be playing for I agree. Share it with us, what do you agree with

http://www.&lt;No links to this website&gt;/sport/footbal...86908-20431021/ http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/atex-imp...icle3741694.ece http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport...ets_striker.php Burnley will tell us the scum offered 3 million plus Riordan so we will need to close to that

BML: I think I've covered those points several times yesterday. I'll do so again if it makes you happy. Sometimes an issue (or range of issues) means it may be impossible to continue in a position where one feels they may be unable to affect the problem. As such, to make the point, other action may be required to precipitate the changes one would like to see. Of course if someone is unhappy, joining the RST board (or at least using the democratic channels available to challenge an issue) is the best course of action - certainly better than insults and unfounded rhetoric on internet forums - but when one has already attempted such a strategy, another may need to be explored. That's where I personally am at this stage. In Summary: If you are unhappy with the direction of the Trust, join the board or turn up to meetings to air your view. Nothing will change. Quit the board. Square One. Frankie - when the two TOP guys step down at the same time as yourself it kinda makes it look like the same reason (s) were responsible for your departures. And if the top guys can't implement the change they desire, how on earth are normal members or newly appointed board members??? 24 hrs later and its still stalemate It just gets more dodgey as the days go by

http://www.&lt;No links to this website&gt;/sport/footbal...86908-20430980/ http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,1...3616206,00.html http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/...p;TEAMHD=soccer http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/arti...p;in_page_id=43 http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_3616242,00.html Is that a negative or a positive post