BigManBlue

Whatever turns you on, is it a love in you want with the scum bags

Just for you info I receieved this from my fellow supporter of 30 yrs, obviously I have replaced our real names, make your own minds up but this is from one of the beat Rangers fans I have ever met yellowcross <_< Hi Brother Whats going on at the RST with those top members resigning Cheers BigManBlue My brothers reply, Don,t know brother, not heard a thing but then again i,m only a member. I joined at the very start for 5 years, went to a few meetings and never went back. I got the feeling it was full of people who thought they were better than everyone else, you know the super/duper Rangers fans and people who were in it to get something for themselves. It was evident early on that it was full of little back stabbing cliques.

Everybody is entitled to their opinion but this is one of the most naive I have ever read Thats just my opinion mate

And I take exception at you taking exception. As for you neither knowing the difference between opinions and facts; nor what a debate is, that I don't care about. I'm sure you're old enough to take responsibility for your own education. LOL - that's really all I can do to that. Coincidence, thats exactly what I did

Gentlemans agreement guaranteed <_<

Watch it, you're dealing with a keyboard hard man :angry2: I thought so

http://sport.scotsman.com/football/Title-p...gers.4121825.jp http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/rugbynation...91466-20978937/ http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,1...3616074,00.html http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/...p;TEAMHD=soccer And who was the ventriloquist, McCulloch ??

Walter will decide that <_<

With all due respect (since I like what you have to say most of the time) if you cannot come into this debate and add at least a modicum of your own thought then don't bother at all. First of all I will post as I choose. Secondly this is not a debate, it is just you and friends (or you under other names, I neither know nor care) spouting poorly informed rubbish about the RST and Frankie doing an admirable job of putting you right. Not that you'll pay any heed. But thanks for the positive feedback Is that a nobody messes with me attitude I detected there, oh sorry for butting in !!

What about the lump of wood McCulloch he has cost an absolute fortune well he's a managers favourite, not much we can do about him. On form he isn't a bad player. On form he isn't a good player either !!

What about the lump of wood McCulloch he has cost an absolute fortune well he's a managers favourite, not much we can do about him. On form he isn't a bad player. Ah managers favourite, Miller !!!

http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Ne...1319481,00.html Yes but which football club will he be playing for I agree. Share it with us, what do you agree with

http://www.&lt;No links to this website&gt;/sport/footbal...86908-20431021/ http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/atex-imp...icle3741694.ece http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport...ets_striker.php Burnley will tell us the scum offered 3 million plus Riordan so we will need to close to that

BML: I think I've covered those points several times yesterday. I'll do so again if it makes you happy. Sometimes an issue (or range of issues) means it may be impossible to continue in a position where one feels they may be unable to affect the problem. As such, to make the point, other action may be required to precipitate the changes one would like to see. Of course if someone is unhappy, joining the RST board (or at least using the democratic channels available to challenge an issue) is the best course of action - certainly better than insults and unfounded rhetoric on internet forums - but when one has already attempted such a strategy, another may need to be explored. That's where I personally am at this stage. In Summary: If you are unhappy with the direction of the Trust, join the board or turn up to meetings to air your view. Nothing will change. Quit the board. Square One. Frankie - when the two TOP guys step down at the same time as yourself it kinda makes it look like the same reason (s) were responsible for your departures. And if the top guys can't implement the change they desire, how on earth are normal members or newly appointed board members??? 24 hrs later and its still stalemate It just gets more dodgey as the days go by

http://www.&lt;No links to this website&gt;/sport/footbal...86908-20430980/ http://www.teamtalk.com/football/story/0,1...3616206,00.html http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/...p;TEAMHD=soccer http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/arti...p;in_page_id=43 http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_3616242,00.html Is that a negative or a positive post

What about the lump of wood McCulloch he has cost an absolute fortune

http://www.theherald.co.uk/sport/headlines...at_comments.php So "criminal" is a bad word eh? What about Levein calling McCurry a cheat? Doesn't that have worse connotations? Beggers beleif. He didnt actually use the word cheat

Is it really a blow, I dont think so !!

http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Ne...1319481,00.html Yes but which football club will he be playing for

Smith is a good replacement eh, thats why I think the rumour mill at your end is sh-te

http://www.rangers.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Ne...1319481,00.html Yes but which football club will he be playing for

Who 'understood' that then? We all 'understand' he is very keen to stay. So some of the papers said, he will do as he is told at the end of the day

Carlos is young and Wattie doesnt play younger players than him Have you said anything positive at all in your 145 posts? I think there is 3 or 4 posts, should I send them for approval before posting mate or should I just lie Either's fine. I cant find any from the 3 or 4 or cant be bothered looking, they were from yesterday I think

Some said that about Super Mo but he won them over <_< aye Mo johnston was the first kafflik we ever had on our books as well. He was the first one to cause a bit of a rumpus during my lifetime Maybe you know of others you can share with us I havent got the full list but here is a part of it declan. Archie 'Punch' Kyle 1904 - 1908 Willie Kivlichan 1906 - 1907 Colin Mainds 1906 - 1907 Tom Murray 1907 - 1908 Pat Lafferty 1886 (before Celtic existed) Tom Dunbar 1891 - 1892 J Tutty 1899 - 1900 William Brown 1912 Joe Donnachie c.1914 - 1918 John Jackson 1917 Laurie Blyth 1951 - 1952 Don Kichenbrand 1955 - 1956 Hugh O'Neill 1976 John Spencer 1984 (Bill Murray, "The Old Firm - Sectarianism, Sport and Society in Scotland (John Donald Publishers, 1984) pp 64-5) It must make your skin crawl Hugh O'Neill 1976 & John Spencer 1984 I can clearly recall them but I told you none have kicked up a fuss like Super Mo I dont really care about the rest on your list I wasnt around <_< so the rest of rangers history does not matter to you because you were not around. Of course I do, I just dont care about the other scum bags on his list

Carlos is young and Wattie doesnt play younger players than him Have you said anything positive at all in your 145 posts? I think there is 3 or 4 posts, should I send them for approval before posting mate or should I just lie I honestly think its only a matter of time until Murray and Bain do a deal with someone (possibly Newcastle) to cash in on Cueller. It will be a sad day for Ranger Football Club as we will not only lose a potential legend but it will further emphasise that our beloved club is nothing more than a selling club !! All they have to do is win things ibn Scotland which isnt difficult nowadays and sell our best players to make money they dont care what the fans think as long as they buy the season tickets and turn up every week which we all do anyway