All well and good, and I agree that it's a dreadful tackle, but what of Charlie Adam who didn't even get hauled for disciplinary hearings when during 2 successive matches he clearly and deliberately stamped opponents on the deck last season?
The point is sometimes this stuff goes for you, other times it doesn't.
And far too many fans remain angry at the ones which don't and conveniently forget the ones which do.
Danny, I agree on the Charlie Adam point, but it's almost irrelevant in this case.
The fact that he's been hauled up in front of the beaks means that he's been caught - he shouldn't get away with it because Charlie Adam wasn't hauled up for it.
If the SFA seriously think that...;
...isn't worthy of an explanation, then I must be on the wrong planet.
If it's acceptable, I hope to see it employed more often against Celtic next year though
cant belive that the board of committees have ruled that kyles dive is worse than loovens,mcdonalds tackles.this goes 2 show were the sfa loyaltys lay,septic fc